| Revision as of 15:37, 18 July 2014 editSa.vakilian (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers14,646 edits comment← Previous edit | Revision as of 15:49, 18 July 2014 edit undoSa.vakilian (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers14,646 edits KeepNext edit → | ||
| Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
| ::*], I am sorry but your statement is clearly false. Sunnis and Shias both agree that this is a hadith; the disagreement is only in regard to interpretation of its meaning. | ::*], I am sorry but your statement is clearly false. Sunnis and Shias both agree that this is a hadith; the disagreement is only in regard to interpretation of its meaning. | ||
| ::Additionally, I am offended by your flagrant attack on my character and objectivity. You have no idea who I am nor have we edited together in the past. Not only do you have absolutely no basis for smearing my reputation as an unbiased editor but your assertion that a sunni editor writing on a topic relating to sectarianism must automatically be biased, icomes off as bigoted and shallow. If you won't at least delete such comments or apologize for them, please just refrain grom attacking other good editors that way and focus on the discussion at hand. ] (]) 08:52, 15 July 2014 (UTC) | ::Additionally, I am offended by your flagrant attack on my character and objectivity. You have no idea who I am nor have we edited together in the past. Not only do you have absolutely no basis for smearing my reputation as an unbiased editor but your assertion that a sunni editor writing on a topic relating to sectarianism must automatically be biased, icomes off as bigoted and shallow. If you won't at least delete such comments or apologize for them, please just refrain grom attacking other good editors that way and focus on the discussion at hand. ] (]) 08:52, 15 July 2014 (UTC) | ||
| :::], I am Shia and as MezzoMezzo told "Sunnis and Shias both agree that this is a hadith; the disagreement is only in regard to interpretation of its meaning." Please be polite and check his contributions to find you are wrong about him.--<font face="monospace">](]-])</font> 15:37, 18 July 2014 (UTC) | :::], I am Shia and as ] told "Sunnis and Shias both agree that this is a hadith; the disagreement is only in regard to interpretation of its meaning." Please be polite and check his contributions to find you are wrong about him.--<font face="monospace">](]-])</font> 15:37, 18 July 2014 (UTC) | ||
| <hr style="width:55%;" /> | <hr style="width:55%;" /> | ||
| :<span style="color:#FF4F00;">'''] to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.'''</span><br /> | :<span style="color:#FF4F00;">'''] to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.'''</span><br /> | ||
| Line 20: | Line 20: | ||
| <hr style="width:55%;" /> | <hr style="width:55%;" /> | ||
| *'''Keep/merge''' This seems to be a title dispute/fork, which should be resolved by merger, not deletion. ] (]) 21:32, 10 July 2014 (UTC) | *'''Keep/merge''' This seems to be a title dispute/fork, which should be resolved by merger, not deletion. ] (]) 21:32, 10 July 2014 (UTC) | ||
| * '''Keep''' As you can find in the lead of ] it is a general term which can be used for different events, while ] refers to the specific event which has happened during the ] life. Of course, that article has some problems based on ]. I ask Mezzomezzo to help with improving it instead of deleting. --<font face="monospace">](]-])</font> 15:49, 18 July 2014 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 15:49, 18 July 2014
Hadith of Mubahala
AfDs for this article:- Hadith of Mubahala (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
As stated in the previous AfDs, there is already an article on Mubahala. A hadith is a saying of Muhammad, making it a primary religious source, and this article is essentially just a copy-paste job of a primary religious source.
The first AfD nomination had no commentary at all. The second had comments from one editor, though to be honest I feel it wasn't sufficient as the editor mistakenly though it was the 3rd nomination rather than the 2nd (and based their rationale for not deleting on that), and quoted Misplaced Pages:Ignore all rules for keeping the page which isn't much of a structured position, leading to another "no consensus."
For those who know a bit about Islamic religious texts, this issue is very clear: this quote from Muhammad is copy pasted here and this quote in particular doesn't have significant coverage even though the even the quote is about - Mubahala - does. It's not notable in any way. Renominating one last time per WP:RELIST. MezzoMezzo (talk) 03:34, 25 June 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Islam-related deletion discussions. MezzoMezzo (talk) 03:36, 25 June 2014 (UTC)
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, –Davey2010 • (talk) 07:31, 3 July 2014 (UTC)
- Delete - I'm the only person so far other than the nominator to have opined on this. I'll flip my previous opinion and defer to the expertise of the nominator here. This has been through the wringer again and again; there has been no defense mounted, nor does sourcing seem to support a GNG outcome. Carrite (talk) 18:00, 9 July 2014 (UTC)
- Whether the topic is considered hadith or not seems to be a difference in the Sunni/Shia schism. Insofar as the nominator is openly Sunni, this seems to be COI rather than expertise. Andrew (talk) 21:32, 10 July 2014 (UTC)
- user:Andrew Davidson, I am sorry but your statement is clearly false. Sunnis and Shias both agree that this is a hadith; the disagreement is only in regard to interpretation of its meaning.
- Additionally, I am offended by your flagrant attack on my character and objectivity. You have no idea who I am nor have we edited together in the past. Not only do you have absolutely no basis for smearing my reputation as an unbiased editor but your assertion that a sunni editor writing on a topic relating to sectarianism must automatically be biased, icomes off as bigoted and shallow. If you won't at least delete such comments or apologize for them, please just refrain grom attacking other good editors that way and focus on the discussion at hand. MezzoMezzo (talk) 08:52, 15 July 2014 (UTC)
- user:Andrew Davidson, I am Shia and as User:MezzoMezzo told "Sunnis and Shias both agree that this is a hadith; the disagreement is only in regard to interpretation of its meaning." Please be polite and check his contributions to find you are wrong about him.--Seyyed(t-c) 15:37, 18 July 2014 (UTC)
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, j⚛e decker 16:37, 10 July 2014 (UTC)
- Keep/merge This seems to be a title dispute/fork, which should be resolved by merger, not deletion. Andrew (talk) 21:32, 10 July 2014 (UTC)
- Keep As you can find in the lead of Mubahala it is a general term which can be used for different events, while Hadith of Mubahala refers to the specific event which has happened during the the messenger of God's life. Of course, that article has some problems based on WP:Verifiablity. I ask Mezzomezzo to help with improving it instead of deleting. --Seyyed(t-c) 15:49, 18 July 2014 (UTC)