| Revision as of 22:37, 2 July 2006 editGassyGuy (talk | contribs)5,701 edits →[]← Previous edit | Revision as of 23:02, 2 July 2006 edit undoKicking222 (talk | contribs)Administrators8,994 edits →[]Next edit → | ||
| Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
| ::LMPjr007,Please see ] and ], as already previously mentioned above. ] 22:33, 2 July 2006 (UTC) , | ::LMPjr007,Please see ] and ], as already previously mentioned above. ] 22:33, 2 July 2006 (UTC) , | ||
| *'''Delete''' Fails ] ] 22:37, 2 July 2006 (UTC) | *'''Delete''' Fails ] ] 22:37, 2 July 2006 (UTC) | ||
| *'''Weak keep''' She's been on the Howard Stern Show multiple times. I've actually heard of her, which is very rare for such an "actress". I think this article could be expanded. -- ] 23:02, 2 July 2006 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 23:02, 2 July 2006
Devyn Devine
Another porn star "article" -- with a bad-taste photo too. *sigh*. I'm not a puritan, but if you are going to write up articles on specific porn stars, then they better pass the Misplaced Pages:Notability (people) test and the article has to at least resemble a biography of some sort. -- Netsnipe CVU 19:05, 2 July 2006 (UTC)
- Keep, notable enough (google search) Misplaced Pages is not censored for children. In my humble much less revealing than this Rex Chandler and likely more notable, you are right could use a cleanup but the photo is not that offensive.--John Lake 19:17, 2 July 2006 (UTC)
- Comment Proposed guideline WP:PORN BIO specifically warns against google tests for this kind of subject due to the adult industry practice of google bombing Bwithh 20:48, 2 July 2006 (UTC)
- Comment: I know that Misplaced Pages isn't censored for children. In fact I wouldn't object to the Rex Chandler article at all that you've cited as an example because unlike the two I've nominated so far, it actually reads like a biography and links to a IMDB Page. This article on the other hand is uninformative and is thinly disguised link-spam. -- Netsnipe CVU 19:27, 2 July 2006 (UTC)
- Well, I don't object to the Rex Chandler article at all just saying the Devine image is much less revealing that the one in the Chandler article by a long shot. The Devine image is just an image of a rather well endowed lady.--John Lake 19:41, 2 July 2006 (UTC)
- Keep,The Photo can be changed or replace. But all the information is true and accurate. User:LMPjr007
- The issue of this article's deletion is not over factuality, but notability. Yanksox 19:38, 2 July 2006 (UTC)
- Delete, fails WP:BIO. --Coredesat talk. o.o;; 20:43, 2 July 2006 (UTC)
- Delete fails WP:BIO, as well as proposed guideline WP:PORN BIO. Bwithh 20:48, 2 July 2006 (UTC)
- Delete bust size ≠ notabilty. ~ trialsanderrors 20:50, 2 July 2006 (UTC)
- Delete. Fails to meet relevant guidelines and lack of verifiable evidence. Judging from her Google hits, she is talented at self-promotion with her Yahoo group and myspace page on the first page of hits. However, there is a distinct lack of verifiable material from third-party sources. Capitalistroadster 20:56, 2 July 2006 (UTC)
- KeepBased on the information listed here http://blog.myspace.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=blog.view&friendID=38716995&blogID=134388814&MyToken=afaa3621-42d9-4b21-a854-10f4de50ca7a and here http://www.herecomesjohn.com plus his direct relation to Howard Stern would make her bio acceptable.
- Delete: fails WP:PORN_BIO, which is only a proposed guideline but is very sensible in my opinion. –Dicty (T/C) 21:11, 2 July 2006 (UTC)
- Keep They why is Ron Jemery about to be kept? Or any porn star?User:LMPjr007
- LMPjr007,Please see WP:BIO and WP:PORN BIO, as already previously mentioned above. Bwithh 22:33, 2 July 2006 (UTC) ,
- Delete Fails WP:PORN BIO GassyGuy 22:37, 2 July 2006 (UTC)
- Weak keep She's been on the Howard Stern Show multiple times. I've actually heard of her, which is very rare for such an "actress". I think this article could be expanded. -- Kicking222 23:02, 2 July 2006 (UTC)