| Revision as of 12:58, 29 December 2013 editTyrerj (talk | contribs)243 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit | Revision as of 23:27, 19 July 2014 edit undoNewsAndEventsGuy (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers27,732 edits →DS Alert: new sectionTag: contentious topics alertNext edit → | ||
| Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
| ] (]) 12:58, 29 December 2013 (UTC) | ] (]) 12:58, 29 December 2013 (UTC) | ||
| == DS Alert == | |||
| {{Ivm|2='''Please carefully read this information:''' | |||
| The Arbitration Committee has authorised ] to be used for pages regarding ], a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is ]. | |||
| Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means ] administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the ], our ], or relevant ]. Administrators may impose sanctions such as ], ], or ]. This message is to notify you sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions. | |||
| This message is informational only and does not imply misconduct regarding your contributions to date. | |||
| }}{{Z33}}<!-- Derived from Template:Ds/alert --> ] (]) 23:27, 19 July 2014 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 23:27, 19 July 2014
Please leave the section on alternatives thanks. Most european fabricants/installers are now moving towards using liquid as the energy transfer medium rather than air. This needs to be pointed out.
HELLO! I have no idea which page this is referring to. Tyrerj (talk) 17:28, 1 October 2008 (UTC)
Spellchucker
I just read your interesting post on talk:windows 8 and was distracted by reading "restraint of completion" which looks suspiciously like an automated miscorrection of "restraint of competition". TwoTwoHello (talk) 18:09, 27 December 2013 (UTC)
Yes, those spelling checkers will get you every time if you don't pay close attention. Please feel free to correct it as it appears that I will not be allowed to continue the argument as my well reasoned argument has been perceived as a personal attack. If you find the argument interesting, please feel free to join it. Note that I consider the Software Freedom Law Center and Ziff Davis to be reliable sources. It is quite clear to many reliable sources in the trade press what Microsoft is up to here. It is a new effort to consolidate their monopoly power using illegal restraint of trade. For WP to ignore this obvious fact is a clear bias.
Tyrerj (talk) 12:58, 29 December 2013 (UTC)
DS Alert
Please carefully read this information:
The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding Climate change, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.
Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Misplaced Pages, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.
This message is informational only and does not imply misconduct regarding your contributions to date.Template:Z33 NewsAndEventsGuy (talk) 23:27, 19 July 2014 (UTC)