User talk:190.162.219.249: Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively ← Previous edit Next edit →Content deleted Content addedVisual WikitextInline

Revision as of 01:40, 20 July 2014 editOhnoitsjamie (talk \| contribs)Edit filter managers, Autopatrolled, Administrators261,457 editsm Reverted edits by 190.162.219.249 (talk) to last version by Daniel Case← Previous edit		Revision as of 11:34, 21 July 2014 edit undoRitchie333 (talk \| contribs)Edit filter managers, Autopatrolled, Administrators125,316 edits Undid revision 617651348 by Ohnoitsjamie (talk) He's allowed to remove that. Let another admin review the next unblock request.Next edit →
Line 5:		Line 5:
	::Don't comment in closed off threads and don't remove other's people's comments from within those closed off threads.—] (]) 11:54, 16 July 2014 (UTC)		::Don't comment in closed off threads and don't remove other's people's comments from within those closed off threads.—] (]) 11:54, 16 July 2014 (UTC)

	{{unblock reviewed \| 1=No block is being evaded. When I complain about false allegations, it's deeply offensive to be blocked with more false allegations. Why the trolling? What exactly do you have against me? You think I'm going to go away? \| decline = Obvious block evasion. <b>] ]</b> 22:09, 19 July 2014 (UTC)}}:No, we think you'll eventually get bored of such childish antics, have an epiphany, and go on to sing choir in East Anglia. Or you'll end up realising that Misplaced Pages's admins have to have loads of patience specifically to deal with banned users who refuse to take the hint like you, JarlaxleArtemis, or Lightbringer. —<font color="228B22">] ]</font> <sup><small>]</small></sup> 20:20, 19 July 2014 (UTC)		{{unblock reviewed \| 1=No block is being evaded. When I complain about false allegations, it's deeply offensive to be blocked with more false allegations. Why the trolling? What exactly do you have against me? You think I'm going to go away? \| decline = Obvious block evasion. <b>] ]</b> 22:09, 19 July 2014 (UTC)}}
	::And who the hell are you? Never interacted with you before to the best of my knowledge. I like your royal "we", though it's a bit dickish in the context of posting inane antagonistic comments on random user's talk pages. ] (]) 20:27, 19 July 2014 (UTC)
	:::I'm not using a royal we, and you're fooling nobody. —<font color="228B22">] ]</font> <sup><small>]</small></sup> 20:33, 19 July 2014 (UTC)
	::::Leaving vague insinuations as you did in your edit summary is pretty lame. Have the courage to be explicit: who do you think I am? ] (]) 20:46, 19 July 2014 (UTC)
	:::::] —<font color="228B22">] ]</font> <sup><small>]</small></sup> 20:51, 19 July 2014 (UTC)

	{{unblock reviewed \| 1=Obvious? How so? I was not blocked; I complained about people making false claims; I was blocked with the false claim of block evasion. Perhaps you can explain more clearly which block it's obvious to you that I was evading. ] (]) 23:53, 19 July 2014 (UTC) \| decline = I really can't answer that question, but it's obvious from your ] above that Misplaced Pages benefits from you being blocked, at least for now. — ] (]) 01:10, 20 July 2014 (UTC)}}		{{unblock reviewed \| 1=Obvious? How so? I was not blocked; I complained about people making false claims; I was blocked with the false claim of block evasion. Perhaps you can explain more clearly which block it's obvious to you that I was evading. ] (]) 23:53, 19 July 2014 (UTC) \| decline = I really can't answer that question, but it's obvious from your ] above that Misplaced Pages benefits from you being blocked, at least for now. — ] (]) 01:10, 20 July 2014 (UTC)}}

			{{unblock\|reason=Ah yes, so if you block someone for no reason, and they get angry, then that justifies the block. And you can't work out which block I was supposedly evading so you think of another reason that I should be blocked. I'd like to remind you again that all this is a result of a false accusation of vandalism concerning . I continue to hope that all of you who are partaking in this Kafka-esque bullying and harassment are having fun, and I continue to hope that eventually someone might remember that this place is supposed to be about building an encyclopaedia, not trolling the people who are still trying to do so.] (]) 01:19, 20 July 2014 (UTC)}}

Revision as of 11:34, 21 July 2014

July 2014

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Misplaced Pages, as you did to Misplaced Pages:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Giant Snowman 11:50, 16 July 2014 (UTC)

I left a valid reason in the edit summary. Don't leave snotty incorrect templates here again. 190.162.219.249 (talk) 11:51, 16 July 2014 (UTC)

Don't comment in closed off threads and don't remove other's people's comments from within those closed off threads.—Ryūlóng (琉竜) 11:54, 16 July 2014 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

190.162.219.249 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

No block is being evaded. When I complain about false allegations, it's deeply offensive to be blocked with more false allegations. Why the trolling? What exactly do you have against me? You think I'm going to go away?

Decline reason:

Obvious block evasion. OhNoitsJamie 22:09, 19 July 2014 (UTC)

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

190.162.219.249 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Obvious? How so? I was not blocked; I complained about people making false claims; I was blocked with the false claim of block evasion. Perhaps you can explain more clearly which block it's obvious to you that I was evading. 190.162.219.249 (talk) 23:53, 19 July 2014 (UTC)

Decline reason:

I really can't answer that question, but it's obvious from your incivility above that Misplaced Pages benefits from you being blocked, at least for now. — Daniel Case (talk) 01:10, 20 July 2014 (UTC)

This user is asking that their block be reviewed:

190.162.219.249 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Ah yes, so if you block someone for no reason, and they get angry, then that justifies the block. And you can't work out which block I was supposedly evading so you think of another reason that I should be blocked. I'd like to remind you again that all this is a result of a false accusation of vandalism concerning these changes. I continue to hope that all of you who are partaking in this Kafka-esque bullying and harassment are having fun, and I continue to hope that eventually someone might remember that this place is supposed to be about building an encyclopaedia, not trolling the people who are still trying to do so.190.162.219.249 (talk) 01:19, 20 July 2014 (UTC)

Notes:

In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.

Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=Ah yes, so if you block someone for no reason, and they get angry, then that justifies the block.  And you can't work out which block I was supposedly evading so you think of another reason that I should be blocked.  I'd like to remind you again that all this is a result of a false accusation of vandalism concerning .  I continue to hope that all of you who are partaking in this Kafka-esque bullying and harassment are having fun, and I continue to hope that eventually someone might remember that this place is supposed to be about building an encyclopaedia, not trolling the people who are still trying to do so.] (]) 01:19, 20 July 2014 (UTC) |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=Ah yes, so if you block someone for no reason, and they get angry, then that justifies the block.  And you can't work out which block I was supposedly evading so you think of another reason that I should be blocked.  I'd like to remind you again that all this is a result of a false accusation of vandalism concerning .  I continue to hope that all of you who are partaking in this Kafka-esque bullying and harassment are having fun, and I continue to hope that eventually someone might remember that this place is supposed to be about building an encyclopaedia, not trolling the people who are still trying to do so.] (]) 01:19, 20 July 2014 (UTC) |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=Ah yes, so if you block someone for no reason, and they get angry, then that justifies the block.  And you can't work out which block I was supposedly evading so you think of another reason that I should be blocked.  I'd like to remind you again that all this is a result of a false accusation of vandalism concerning .  I continue to hope that all of you who are partaking in this Kafka-esque bullying and harassment are having fun, and I continue to hope that eventually someone might remember that this place is supposed to be about building an encyclopaedia, not trolling the people who are still trying to do so.] (]) 01:19, 20 July 2014 (UTC) |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}

Category:

Requests for unblock