Misplaced Pages

User:Ihardlythinkso/one-size-fits-all: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< User:Ihardlythinkso Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 16:19, 11 July 2014 editIhardlythinkso (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Page movers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers75,166 edits gender neutral← Previous edit Revision as of 09:57, 22 July 2014 edit undoIhardlythinkso (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Page movers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers75,166 editsNo edit summaryNext edit →
Line 1: Line 1:
The user exhibits overwhelming ] bordering ]. This in the face of numerous of her/his colleagues advising her/him to ]. Instead the user persists in ] and ]-like '''screeds''', '''walls-of-text''', and '''rants''' that are at best unhelpful and at worst ] exhibiting ] behavior that amounts to highly ] to the project. The user seems determined in ] and has thereby demonstrated s/he is ] to help build an encyclopeida. S/he has shown an unrelenting pattern of the same sort of behaviors throughout her/his editing history. The community's patience has worn thin as s/he has shown no signs of ] toward reforming her/his editing practices. ] may well apply. ] is not a suicide pact. The community has little choice now but to concede that this user is either ''unable'' or ''unwilling'' to find an epiphany s/he so desperately needs to be able to edit productively within the community. (We are here to build an encyclopedia, folks, and Misplaced Pages is not for everybody. Some just don't function well in a collaborative editing environment, and I'm afraid the time has come to recognize this user as a '''net negative''' to the encyclopedia. Time to show her/him to the door. It's either now, or be right back here in a couple weeks doing this all over again.) The user should be reminded that "Indefinite" is not "infinite", and after 6 months or a year s/he is welcome to return for reappraisal by her/his peers if the needed changes can be met. But perhaps it's best in the long run for everyone concerned if s/he would just find another hobby where s/he might be happier and can invest her/his time more productively. The user exhibits overwhelming ] bordering on ]. This in the face of numerous of her/his colleagues advising her/him to ]. Instead the user persists in ] and ]-like '''rants''', '''screeds''', and '''walls-of-text''' that are at best unhelpful and at worst ] exhibiting ] behavior that amounts to highly ] to the project. The user seems determined in ] and has thereby demonstrated s/he is ] to help build an encyclopeida. S/he has shown an unrelenting pattern of the same sort of behaviors throughout her/his editing history. The community's patience has worn thin as s/he has shown no signs of ] toward reforming her/his editing practices. ] may well apply. ] is not a suicide pact. The community has little choice now but to concede that this user is either ''unable'' or ''unwilling'' to find the epiphany s/he so desperately needs to be able to edit productively within the community. (We are here to build an encyclopedia, folks, and Misplaced Pages is not for everybody. Some people just don't function well in a collaborative editing environment, and I'm afraid the time has come to recognize this user is a '''net negative''' to the encyclopedia. Enough is enough. Time to show her/him to the door. It's either now, or be right back here in a couple weeks doing this all over again.) The user should be reminded that "Indefinite" is not "infinite", and after 6 months or a year s/he is welcome to return for reappraisal by her/his peers if the needed changes can be met. But perhaps it's best in the long run for everyone concerned if s/he would just find another hobby where s/he might be happier and can invest her/his time more productively.

Revision as of 09:57, 22 July 2014

The user exhibits overwhelming WP:IDHT bordering on WP:Competence is required. This in the face of numerous of her/his colleagues advising her/him to WP:Drop the stick and back slowly away from the horse carcass. Instead the user persists in WP:POINTy and WP:DIVA-like rants, screeds, and walls-of-text that are at best unhelpful and at worst WP:Tendentious editing exhibiting WP:BATTLEground behavior that amounts to highly WP:Disruptive editing to the project. The user seems determined in WP:Righting great wrongs and has thereby demonstrated s/he is WP:NOTHERE to help build an encyclopeida. S/he has shown an unrelenting pattern of the same sort of behaviors throughout her/his editing history. The community's patience has worn thin as s/he has shown no signs of WP:CLUE toward reforming her/his editing practices. WP:Suicide by admin may well apply. WP:AGF is not a suicide pact. The community has little choice now but to concede that this user is either unable or unwilling to find the epiphany s/he so desperately needs to be able to edit productively within the community. (We are here to build an encyclopedia, folks, and Misplaced Pages is not for everybody. Some people just don't function well in a collaborative editing environment, and I'm afraid the time has come to recognize this user is a net negative to the encyclopedia. Enough is enough. Time to show her/him to the door. It's either now, or be right back here in a couple weeks doing this all over again.) The user should be reminded that "Indefinite" is not "infinite", and after 6 months or a year s/he is welcome to return for reappraisal by her/his peers if the needed changes can be met. But perhaps it's best in the long run for everyone concerned if s/he would just find another hobby where s/he might be happier and can invest her/his time more productively.