| Revision as of 04:33, 17 July 2014 edit117Avenue (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, File movers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers64,480 edits →Nomination of [] for deletion: new section← Previous edit | Revision as of 17:31, 23 July 2014 edit undoThivierr (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers26,779 edits ←Replaced content with 'Hi. --~~~~'Next edit → | ||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| Hi. |
Hi. --] (]) 17:31, 23 July 2014 (UTC) | ||
| == Stefan Molyneux == | |||
| ] Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an ]. '''Being involved in an edit war can result in your being ]'''—especially if you violate the ], which states that an editor must not perform more than three ] on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—'''even if you don't violate the three-revert rule'''—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. | |||
| To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's ] to work toward making a version that represents ] among editors. See ] for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant ] or seek ]. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary ]. <!-- Template:uw-3rr --> <span style="font-family: Palatino;"> ] • ]</span> 20:14, 4 July 2014 (UTC) | |||
| :You're right, I'm sorry for getting frustrated and resorting to reverts. --] (]) 02:48, 5 July 2014 (UTC) | |||
| == FYI == | |||
| Hello. I was disappointed to see the discussion of the Molyneux lede cut short with Netoholic/Srich's insertion of new text which doesn't fully address the issues. The reason I'm posting here is to inform you that I left a note on Srich's talk objecting to his insertion of Netoholic's language without prior consensus on talk, and that Srich cited a "thanks" ping from you in dismissing my concern. You might want to have a look on Srich32977's talk page to see what happened. Thanks. ]] 19:25, 6 July 2014 (UTC) | |||
| :I thanked him for making a sincere effort at compromise on a relatively minor issue. I think a lot of conflicts over smaller items (comparatively), have caused us to miss focus on much larger issues. --] (]) 19:38, 6 July 2014 (UTC) | |||
| ::Please don't misunderstand, I'm not here to quarrel with your right to thank whom you please. On the other hand, given that Srich's edit was done to facilitate Netoholic's insertion of text after he self-reverted out of concern for an edit-war block -- and given that I do think we should get consensus on talk rather than risk yet another go-round on this topic -- I doubt that your "thanks" was intended to justify Srich's action in facilitating Netoholic's edit or short-circuiting talk consensus before the edit. It's entirely up to you whether you feel comfortable with Srich invoking your gracious gesture as justification for his action, but it struck me that it would be up to you to speak for yourself, not up to him to use you in that way. Anyway, that was my reason for the message here. ]] 20:00, 6 July 2014 (UTC) | |||
| ==Eurovision Young Dancers 2007== | |||
| Hi, I am sorry that I read your comment too late and my article has been deleted, I am disappointed because I thought that since it was in the official page it could be useful to have this information included on the website... is there a way I can recuperate at least the information I introduced? Is there a way the article can be valid? Thanks ] (]) 22:55, 6 July 2014 (UTC) | |||
| :Yes, you can visit ] and follow the directions there. --] (]) 00:14, 7 July 2014 (UTC) | |||
| == ] == | |||
| Nothing useful in the history, the previous deleted article was a childish autobio, not the same person. Cheers, ] (]) 08:56, 7 July 2014 (UTC) | |||
| :Ok, thanks for looking. --] (]) 14:23, 7 July 2014 (UTC) | |||
| == Nomination of ] for deletion == | |||
| <div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">]</div>A discussion is taking place as to whether the article ''']''' is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to ] or whether it should be ]. | |||
| The article will be discussed at ] until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines. | |||
| Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.<!-- Template:afd-notice --> ] <sup><span style="color:Red;font-size:85%;">«] ♦ ] ♦ ]»</span></sup> 01:28, 8 July 2014 (UTC) | |||
| == Nomination of ] for deletion == | |||
| <div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">]</div>A discussion is taking place as to whether the article ''']''' is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to ] or whether it should be ]. | |||
| The article will be discussed at ] until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines. | |||
| Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.<!-- Template:afd-notice --> ] (]) 20:17, 13 July 2014 (UTC) | |||
| == Nomination of ] for deletion == | |||
| <div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">]</div>A discussion is taking place as to whether the article ''']''' is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to ] or whether it should be ]. | |||
| The article will be discussed at ] until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines. | |||
| Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.<!-- Template:afd-notice --> ] (]) 04:33, 17 July 2014 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 17:31, 23 July 2014
Hi. --Rob (talk) 17:31, 23 July 2014 (UTC)