| Revision as of 08:22, 3 July 2006 editJ Di (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users23,687 edits question← Previous edit | Revision as of 08:28, 3 July 2006 edit undoSte4k (talk | contribs)3,630 edits Cooperation and failure to participate in consensus.Next edit → | ||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
| JD_UK wrote in the response, "As for Ste4k, I initially did not feel there was any conflict, but his(?) decision..." I find it personally insulting that an editor would insist on assuming the incorrect gender even after being warned. That may be the cultural norm in Austrailia in regard to women, however, this is an NPOV encyclopedia, and there isn't any call for anyone purposely trying to act as if one hasn't been told before. ] 08:19, 3 July 2006 (UTC) | JD_UK wrote in the response, "As for Ste4k, I initially did not feel there was any conflict, but his(?) decision..." I find it personally insulting that an editor would insist on assuming the incorrect gender even after being warned. That may be the cultural norm in Austrailia in regard to women, however, this is an NPOV encyclopedia, and there isn't any call for anyone purposely trying to act as if one hasn't been told before. ] 08:19, 3 July 2006 (UTC) | ||
| :Well, are you male or female? I don't feel comfortable using gender-neutral pronouns, I find them rude and insulting when used. That's why I prefer not to use them. --<font face="verdana"><small>]</small><nowiki>]</sup>|<sub>]</sub></font>] 08:22, 3 July 2006 (UTC) | :Well, are you male or female? I don't feel comfortable using gender-neutral pronouns, I find them rude and insulting when used. That's why I prefer not to use them. --<font face="verdana"><small>]</small><nowiki>]</sup>|<sub>]</sub></font>] 08:22, 3 July 2006 (UTC) | ||
| == Cooperation and failure to participate in consensus. == | |||
| In the response, JD_UK wrote: "I opened a mediation case to try and get a third perspective on the situation, but I did not feel that a reasonable solution had been reached." | |||
| :Two other editors had one opinion, and JD_UK disregarded their opinions. | |||
| In the response, JD_UK wrote: "9cds often says that I am unable to compromise, but I feel that the same can be said of her". | |||
| :9cds started a consensus poll which lasted several days and its conclusion showed clearly that editors participating agreed about past tense. JD_UK refused to participate in the consensus poll. After it had been established that a consensus was reached, JD_UK proceeded to ignore it altogether and even make edits that were specifically in disregard to consensus reached. | |||
| ] 08:28, 3 July 2006 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 08:28, 3 July 2006
Gender classification
JD_UK wrote in the response, "As for Ste4k, I initially did not feel there was any conflict, but his(?) decision..." I find it personally insulting that an editor would insist on assuming the incorrect gender even after being warned. That may be the cultural norm in Austrailia in regard to women, however, this is an NPOV encyclopedia, and there isn't any call for anyone purposely trying to act as if one hasn't been told before. Ste4k 08:19, 3 July 2006 (UTC)
- Well, are you male or female? I don't feel comfortable using gender-neutral pronouns, I find them rude and insulting when used. That's why I prefer not to use them. --JD 08:22, 3 July 2006 (UTC)
Cooperation and failure to participate in consensus.
In the response, JD_UK wrote: "I opened a mediation case to try and get a third perspective on the situation, but I did not feel that a reasonable solution had been reached."
- Two other editors had one opinion, and JD_UK disregarded their opinions.
In the response, JD_UK wrote: "9cds often says that I am unable to compromise, but I feel that the same can be said of her".
- 9cds started a consensus poll which lasted several days and its conclusion showed clearly that editors participating agreed about past tense. JD_UK refused to participate in the consensus poll. After it had been established that a consensus was reached, JD_UK proceeded to ignore it altogether and even make edits that were specifically in disregard to consensus reached.