| Revision as of 03:08, 28 July 2014 editGranada2000 (talk | contribs)120 edits →Four sleepy kittehs for you!← Previous edit | Revision as of 06:00, 28 July 2014 edit undoGranada2000 (talk | contribs)120 edits →Four sleepy kittehs for you!Next edit → | ||
| Line 73: | Line 73: | ||
| Hi Dolescum. First , Thank you for your help editing the page I |
Hi Dolescum. First , Thank you for your help editing the page I was creating about Suzanne Marie Olsson. I am aware that she had pages on Wiki previously- but eventually these got in to editing wars and she demanded the pages be deleted. This is because people would post a line or two from news articles-just like you did earlier today- and, depending on one's religious views- these segments of sentences could be taken out of context and make Olsson look really bad. That's the purpose behind these false planted articles and she has already explained that. So it is biased and unfair to keep inserting such info when it is known that the person disputes and denies these. Some people would publish these bad lines-("Olsson attempted to break in to the tomb and steal DNA","Olsson claims to be 59th descendant of jesus" et cetera) but not the explanations. If you read the article again, you will see that she had leading archaeologists on the team, and had the approval of the Chief Minister, whom she tells in her book she had been to his home several times. So there was no "break-in" and "Stealing DNA'. If you read further, she states that Laurence Gardner was the first to make this claim about her. But most people just go by the news article without knowing the full background story, and this becomes very misleading. If you read further down the article, she clearly states that some news stories were "fed" to the press falsely and maliciously. I hope you understand. I realize this will probably happen again and again because anyone can edit at Wiki and keep making these same mistakes. I have asked for a speedy deletion of the page. I am so grateful for your help and interest. But it's just not fair to Olsson. Best the page is deleted....it was up for deletion anyway so no one will care. I really do appreciate your understanding! | ||
Revision as of 06:00, 28 July 2014
I dislike the vast bulk of wikipedians, so please go away unless you have pictures of adorable kittens.
A kitten for you!
_by_Ron.jpg)
i understand i was only experamening sorry for all your trouble
Zira456 (talk) 16:10, 15 March 2013 (UTC)
A kitten for you!
A kitten for you!
Dolescum, Here is an adorable kitten. Signed, the new user that created Rodli, Beskar, Krueger and Pletcher, S.C.
Wikinnikinnic 01:19, 11 April 2014 (UTC)
A kitten for you!
And here is one unrelated to the bicolor twins.
Wikinnikinnic 01:21, 11 April 2014 (UTC)
Talkback
Message added 03:34, 10 June 2014 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Thanks Piguy101 (talk) 03:55, 10 June 2014 (UTC)
User:JapaneseKnoweed
Hi, I recently added a page to Misplaced Pages entitled 'Japanese knotweed claims' which has recently been deleted for unambiguous advertising. Firstly I would like to apologise for transgressing the Misplaced Pages's code of conduct and would like to have another opportunity to write a short bio about Japanese Knotweed Claims again, hopefully the second time will be more acceptable. I was wondering if a) it would be ok to do so and what are the things I should avoid doing so the new page doesn't get deleted. b) what can be done to make things as if the page had never been created, i.e. how to remove the message explaining the deletion and removing the search result for 'Japanese knotweed claims'
simplicity.co.za
Please let me know what to remove of this page to prevent deletion. Gustav.penny (talk) 19:08, 1 July 2014 (UTC)
Bone Marrow Aspirate Concentrate
I changed your proposed deletion to a speedy - db-ad Cheers Jim1138 (talk) 08:36, 13 June 2014 (UTC)
- @Jim1138: Cheers, genuinely wasn't sure if that one would pass on a G11. Dolescum (talk) 10:18, 13 June 2014 (UTC)
A kitten for you!
Thank you for the archiving help at Batman: Arkham Origins Blackgate.
Favre1fan93 (talk) 20:41, 24 June 2014 (UTC)
Speedy deletion declined: SimplyShe
Hello Dolescum. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of SimplyShe, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: "world's larget pet fashion supplier" assertion, with refs that at least establish this as a real thing, and with some support for assertion - to WP:AfD? . Thank you. Shirt58 (talk) 08:02, 25 June 2014 (UTC)
Four sleepy kittehs for you!
So I herd you liek kittens, etc, etc. 
--Shirt58 (talk) 12:09, 25 June 2014 (UTC)
Hi Dolescum. First , Thank you for your help editing the page I was creating about Suzanne Marie Olsson. I am aware that she had pages on Wiki previously- but eventually these got in to editing wars and she demanded the pages be deleted. This is because people would post a line or two from news articles-just like you did earlier today- and, depending on one's religious views- these segments of sentences could be taken out of context and make Olsson look really bad. That's the purpose behind these false planted articles and she has already explained that. So it is biased and unfair to keep inserting such info when it is known that the person disputes and denies these. Some people would publish these bad lines-("Olsson attempted to break in to the tomb and steal DNA","Olsson claims to be 59th descendant of jesus" et cetera) but not the explanations. If you read the article again, you will see that she had leading archaeologists on the team, and had the approval of the Chief Minister, whom she tells in her book she had been to his home several times. So there was no "break-in" and "Stealing DNA'. If you read further, she states that Laurence Gardner was the first to make this claim about her. But most people just go by the news article without knowing the full background story, and this becomes very misleading. If you read further down the article, she clearly states that some news stories were "fed" to the press falsely and maliciously. I hope you understand. I realize this will probably happen again and again because anyone can edit at Wiki and keep making these same mistakes. I have asked for a speedy deletion of the page. I am so grateful for your help and interest. But it's just not fair to Olsson. Best the page is deleted....it was up for deletion anyway so no one will care. I really do appreciate your understanding!