Revision as of 14:19, 7 August 2014 editPeriglio (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users10,637 edits →Out of scope: new section← Previous edit | Revision as of 14:20, 7 August 2014 edit undoPeriglio (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users10,637 editsm →Out of scope: SignedNext edit → | ||
Line 27: | Line 27: | ||
== Out of scope == | == Out of scope == | ||
Without going into the rights and wrongs of the current dispute, this article is supposed to be about the macaque. Surely this is not the place to have a section on copyright issues? See relevant policy ] | Without going into the rights and wrongs of the current dispute, this article is supposed to be about the macaque. Surely this is not the place to have a section on copyright issues? See relevant policy ] ] (]) 14:20, 7 August 2014 (UTC) |
Revision as of 14:20, 7 August 2014
Give the guy his photo back! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 5.70.189.38 (talk) 13:17, 7 August 2014 (UTC)
Primates Start‑class Mid‑importance | ||||||||||
|
Indonesia Start‑class Mid‑importance | ||||||||||
|
earlier conversation
"Crested black macaque" seems to be the more widely used name. Should we change the name of the article? Tim Long 00:56, 27 May 2006 (UTC)
- Celebes Crested Macaque is its official common name, according to Mammal Species of the World, 3rd ed. - UtherSRG (talk) 03:18, 27 May 2006 (UTC)
Assessed
Against conservation status as well as content SatuSuro 08:42, 6 February 2009 (UTC)
Killer Dolphins
I have posted a long comment in the Talk section of the main Macaque genus article, about the renaming of all the macaque species articles to " Macaque" (e.g. "Barbary Macaque") from their traditionally names (e.g. Barbary Ape).
Would you please take a look at that here:
http://en.wikipedia.org/Talk:Macaque#Killer_Dolphins
And then correct this individual species article as necessary — I'm not sure which macaque species may have actually been called " Macaque" traditionally.
(And I hope you can see that the fact that I don't know that, after reading a Misplaced Pages article about the species, is why rewriting reality in Misplaced Pages is a problem.)
Thanks! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.180.30.135 (talk) 12:21, 16 September 2012 (UTC)
Out of scope
Without going into the rights and wrongs of the current dispute, this article is supposed to be about the macaque. Surely this is not the place to have a section on copyright issues? See relevant policy WP:NOT#JOURNALISM Periglio (talk) 14:20, 7 August 2014 (UTC)
Categories: