Revision as of 17:12, 7 August 2014 editDank (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users133,970 edits r← Previous edit | Revision as of 17:16, 7 August 2014 edit undoSNUGGUMS (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers121,331 edits updateNext edit → | ||
Line 407: | Line 407: | ||
====Comments from Dank==== | ====Comments from Dank==== | ||
'''Support''' | |||
{{Collapse top|title=Resolved concerns from ]}} | |||
'''Comments'''. As always, feel free to revert my copyediting. - Dank (]) | '''Comments'''. As always, feel free to revert my copyediting. - Dank (]) | ||
*Disclaimer: I have a lot more experience with history articles. | *Disclaimer: I have a lot more experience with history articles. | ||
Line 454: | Line 456: | ||
::::*Any other concerns or does this article have your support, {{u|Dank}}? '''] (] / ])''' 16:57, 7 August 2014 (UTC) | ::::*Any other concerns or does this article have your support, {{u|Dank}}? '''] (] / ])''' 16:57, 7 August 2014 (UTC) | ||
:::::*I'm not a reviewer these days, just a copyeditor. The prose looks really good. - Dank (]) 17:12, 7 August 2014 (UTC) | :::::*I'm not a reviewer these days, just a copyeditor. The prose looks really good. - Dank (]) 17:12, 7 August 2014 (UTC) | ||
::::::*Thank you {{u|Dank}} :), I'll count that as a '''support'''. '''] (] / ])''' 17:16, 7 August 2014 (UTC) | |||
{{collapse bottom}} |
Revision as of 17:16, 7 August 2014
Katy Perry
Katy Perry (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Toolbox |
---|
- Nominator(s): Snuggums (talk / edits) 19:50, 25 July 2014 (UTC) & S△M 19:50, 25 July 2014 (UTC)
Here is Katheryn Elizabeth "Katy" Hudson aka Katy Perry. She's the California Gurl who kissed another girl and very much liked it. When I first started working on this article slightly over one year ago, it was a delisted GA. Ever since, I've done intricate work on this article and have made over 1,000 edits to the page. I now believe she's finally ready for that bronze star. In March 2009, she went through a premature GAN and failed for prose, but was successfully brought to GA three weeks later. However, she was delisted in October 2012 for prose and reference issues. After a detailed peer review from JennKR this past January, the article went through more expansion and fine-tuning before a successful GAN last month. Thank you again, Petergriffin9901, for all your input during the GAN. Looking back, the article was in better state this past May (when I nominated this for GA) than it ever was before October 2012. Shortly afterwards, I took this to peer review for further improvement. Within the last couple weeks, I've done some more polishing before this FAC. Snuggums (talk / edits) 19:50, 25 July 2014 (UTC)
Comments from Chasewc91
- Support – see below. –Chase (talk / contribs) 01:22, 28 July 2014 (UTC)
Resolved concerns from Chasewc91 |
---|
|
Overall, this is a very well-written and well-structured article that includes an abundance of info without being obscenely large. I will be more than happy to lend my support once these concerns are addressed. –Chase (talk / contribs) 02:04, 27 July 2014 (UTC)
- Thank you Chasewc91 :D! Snuggums (talk / edits) 05:02, 27 July 2014 (UTC)
- Remaining concerns are dated 23:48, 27 July 2014 (UTC). (CTRL+F the timestamp) Just thought I'd add this at the bottom for convenience. –Chase (talk / contribs) 23:48, 27 July 2014 (UTC)
- Chase how does she look now? Also, do you think perhaps there's enough material to warrant a "legacy" section for this article or is it too soon in her career?? Snuggums (talk / edits) 00:34, 28 July 2014 (UTC)
- Way too soon. But a lot of great improvements have been made and I now gladly support this nomination. Kudos to your very hard work, Snuggums and Sam, and best of luck. –Chase (talk / contribs) 01:22, 28 July 2014 (UTC)
- Thank you very much sir :3 Snuggums (talk / edits) 01:29, 28 July 2014 (UTC)
Comments from WikiRedactor
Resolved concerns from WikiRedactor |
---|
Definitely a well-written article, I will be happy to give my support when these comments have been addressed. I will check back in a short while! WikiRedactor (talk) 15:13, 27 July 2014 (UTC)
|
- Support, I am very happy to see all of the hard work you put into this article has paid off! Great job! WikiRedactor (talk) 18:41, 27 July 2014 (UTC)
- Thank you- I have indeed put my blood, sweat, and tears into this page! Snuggums (talk / edits) 18:43, 27 July 2014 (UTC)
- Support, I am very happy to see all of the hard work you put into this article has paid off! Great job! WikiRedactor (talk) 18:41, 27 July 2014 (UTC)
Comments from Ritchie333
- Conditional Support pending comments elsewhere and referencing problems listed below - I was involved in the peer review, and thought there would be some more minor prose issues that FAC would throw up, but Snuggums seems to be on top of them all, so I'm happy to think this will not be hard to reach the FA criteria. It's a well written and informative article about an increasingly important figure in modern entertainment. Ritchie333 18:37, 27 July 2014 (UTC)
- Thanks Ritchie333 :D! Snuggums (talk / edits) 18:43, 27 July 2014 (UTC)
Comments from Prism
- Just a minor point, but why isn't—at least—Sam listed as a nominator? He really contributed to the development of the article and should get some recognition, in my opinion. My comments on prose/files/etc will be here soon. (I'm excited to see that this already has two supports!) pedro | talk 20:06, 27 July 2014 (UTC)
- Prism the reason is because when I launched this FAC, it automatically just listed my own username. Snuggums (talk / edits) 23:24, 27 July 2014 (UTC)
- I think you should add him, though. pedro | talk 23:29, 27 July 2014 (UTC)
- Now added, Prism. Snuggums (talk / edits) 23:43, 27 July 2014 (UTC)
- Yeah, I saw. I'll be back tomorrow. pedro | talk 00:42, 28 July 2014 (UTC)
Resolved concerns from Prism |
---|
|
pedro | talk 14:53, 28 July 2014 (UTC)
- How is she now, Prism? Snuggums (talk / edits) 15:12, 28 July 2014 (UTC)
- Better than ever, 'resulting in me giving you another Support' (that's me trying to make a joke). I know you—Snuggums—since last year, when we started edit-wars over what images to include on Prism's composition section. You've come a long way since then, in terms of writing and being nice to others. This is truly your finest work, as well as Sam's, and I can't congratulate you enough! pedro | talk 15:29, 28 July 2014 (UTC)
- Thank you Prism! I do agree this is easily my best work yet, and is unquestionably the article I'm most proud of so far. Snuggums (talk / edits) 15:46, 28 July 2014 (UTC)
- Better than ever, 'resulting in me giving you another Support' (that's me trying to make a joke). I know you—Snuggums—since last year, when we started edit-wars over what images to include on Prism's composition section. You've come a long way since then, in terms of writing and being nice to others. This is truly your finest work, as well as Sam's, and I can't congratulate you enough! pedro | talk 15:29, 28 July 2014 (UTC)
Comments from IPadPerson
- Support, Your tireless work on this article has really made it meet the requirements for FA based on its layout and look. This would definitely be the right time for its nomination to FA instead of doing so at the last minute. The article's sources also seem to be in very good shape. Keep up the good work! IPadPerson (talk) 08:10, 28 July 2014 (UTC)
- Thank you IPadPerson :3 Snuggums (talk / edits) 13:39, 28 July 2014 (UTC)
Comments from Retrohead
Resolved concerns from Retrohead |
---|
Finally got the time to review this article, so I'll jump straight to my concerns:
Addressed your points, Retrohead. Snuggums (talk / edits) 13:39, 28 July 2014 (UTC)
|
- Support on prose and support on enthusiasm and team work. My concerns were dealt with the speed of light, and I've got no further objections. You've outdone yourself on this one Snuggums. Turning an article from C-class into a featured item is an admirable feat. I'll leave the image and source review on someone else. Good luck with those.--Retrohead (talk) 15:51, 28 July 2014 (UTC)
- Thank you very much, Retrohead :3 Snuggums (talk / edits) 15:55, 28 July 2014 (UTC)
Comments from Krimuk90
- Support. I have made some minor corrections, but excellent work overall! Happy to lend my support. Good luck! :) -- KRIMUK90 ✉ 01:56, 29 July 2014 (UTC)
- Thank you Krimuk90, and also for the fixes! Snuggums (talk / edits) 01:59, 29 July 2014 (UTC)
Image review from IndianBio
Starting on image and non-free content review (if any) —Indian:BIO · 02:34, 29 July 2014 (UTC)
- IndianBio, the verdict, please? Snuggums (talk / edits) 22:53, 29 July 2014 (UTC)
- Not sure if this helps, but
- File:Katy Perry NRJ 2014 3.jpg — image hosted on Commons with OTRS permission. Okay
- File:Katy Perry performing.jpg — image obtained from a free online source (i.e. Flickr) with Misplaced Pages-applicable Creative Commons license from its uploader. Okay
- File:Katy Perry–Zenith Paris.jpg — image obtained from Flickr too, under the same conditions. Okay
- File:Katy Perry at the Prudential Center (14446231669).jpg — the same goes for this image, hosted on Flickr with CC license. Okay
- File:Alaniss.jpg — image hosted on Commons, although by a user whose only contribution is this image, and I'm not even sure if it was taken by him. I'd reccomend you look for another image of Alanis. Not okay
- In that case, Thalcomb, I don't need your photograaaaaph..... replaced with File:Alanis Morissette - Zenith Paris - Juin 2012 (7481178886).jpg Snuggums (talk / edits) 03:29, 30 July 2014 (UTC)
- Replaced this with an even higher quality image: File:Alanis Morissette 5-19-2014.jpg S△M 14:50, 30 July 2014 (UTC)
- File:Freddie Mercury performing in New Haven, CT, November 1978.jpg — image hosted on Commons with OTRS ticket confirmed. Okay
- File:Katy Perry 2011.jpg — hosted on Flickr with CC-BY-SA 2.0 which can be used on Wiki. Okay
- File:Katy Perry UNICEF 2012.jpg — image obtained from Flickr with applicable CC license. Okay pedro | talk 00:48, 30 July 2014 (UTC)
- Hi @SNUGGUMS: all of them appear as fine to me per the licensing. My only qualm is the desciption of each image at their respective pages in commons. That needs to be updated to reflect. Also, I believe the descriptions of Perry's images in the main article is quite bland. Its all about "Perry performing on XXX tour" or "Perry at XXX event". A little more description would be better. Normally if you see books and academic materials, there are quite a few tid-bit about the image present in a page. That's what I'm trying to achieve here. —Indian:BIO · 06:27, 30 July 2014 (UTC)
- Thank you IndianBio, I'm contemplating better image captions now (though this could take a bit as my hands are somewhat tied). Snuggums (talk / edits) 17:44, 30 July 2014 (UTC)
- Another thing, the Billboard references for before 2010 has publisher as Prometheus Global Media, it should be Nielsen Business Media since they were the publisher for Billboard from 1989 to 2009, when the company was taken over by Prometheus. —Indian:BIO · 08:51, 31 July 2014 (UTC)
- IndianBio I've touched up the references and have made some caption tweaks. How does she look now? Snuggums (talk / edits) 01:49, 1 August 2014 (UTC)
- SNUGGUMS the captions look much better and at least provide some context. I replaced the Prismatic tour image with its corresponding cropped version, it will be Flickrreviewed soon. And I'm happy to lend my support for this article. —Indian:BIO · 14:38, 1 August 2014 (UTC)
- Thank you IndianBio :D! Snuggums (talk / edits) 14:43, 1 August 2014 (UTC)
- SNUGGUMS the captions look much better and at least provide some context. I replaced the Prismatic tour image with its corresponding cropped version, it will be Flickrreviewed soon. And I'm happy to lend my support for this article. —Indian:BIO · 14:38, 1 August 2014 (UTC)
- IndianBio I've touched up the references and have made some caption tweaks. How does she look now? Snuggums (talk / edits) 01:49, 1 August 2014 (UTC)
- Another thing, the Billboard references for before 2010 has publisher as Prometheus Global Media, it should be Nielsen Business Media since they were the publisher for Billboard from 1989 to 2009, when the company was taken over by Prometheus. —Indian:BIO · 08:51, 31 July 2014 (UTC)
- Thank you IndianBio, I'm contemplating better image captions now (though this could take a bit as my hands are somewhat tied). Snuggums (talk / edits) 17:44, 30 July 2014 (UTC)
- Hi @SNUGGUMS: all of them appear as fine to me per the licensing. My only qualm is the desciption of each image at their respective pages in commons. That needs to be updated to reflect. Also, I believe the descriptions of Perry's images in the main article is quite bland. Its all about "Perry performing on XXX tour" or "Perry at XXX event". A little more description would be better. Normally if you see books and academic materials, there are quite a few tid-bit about the image present in a page. That's what I'm trying to achieve here. —Indian:BIO · 06:27, 30 July 2014 (UTC)
Comments from HĐ
- Support I can't seek out any major issues on this article. Neatly done! Simon (talk) 13:40, 30 July 2014 (UTC)
- Thank you HĐ :D! Snuggums (talk / edits) 17:34, 30 July 2014 (UTC)
Coord notes
Last time I looked here we hadn't had a source review for reliability and formatting, nor a spotcheck of sources for accuracy and avoidance of close paraphrasing. FYI, the former is a check we try to make on every FAC, the latter is an extra hoop to jump through for people who haven't taken an article to FA before, which I think is the case here. If I'm right about these checks not having been performed, pls post requests for them at the top of WT:FAC. Cheers, Ian Rose (talk) 03:53, 5 August 2014 (UTC)
- I checked some sources during the PR (I was not happy about at least one comment and it was removed), but one general comment I would make is that films, such as Katy Perry: Part of Me and E! Special: Katy Perry per WP:CITEHOW need an "approximate time at which event or point of interest occurs, where appropriate". You can use {{sfn}} with the "loc" parameter to support this, and it will avoid having one citation that's referenced in 5+ different places. As regards paraphrasing, Earwig's bot throws an error. Ritchie333 09:56, 5 August 2014 (UTC)
- @SNUGGUMS:, you can use the {{sfn}} or {{harvnb}} templates for this. Instead of p=294 (indicating pages), you can give p=00:34 (indicating at what time the interview it is sourcing took place in the film). Ask me if you need help. —Indian:BIO · 11:10, 5 August 2014 (UTC)
- Yes, Ian Rose- this is my first FA nomination. Ritchie indeed did some sourcechecking, and so did Chase. The E! Television special will take some searching. IndianBio please do help- I might be able to find some timeframes for KP3D, but don't know how to use those ref formats for film/television. Snuggums (talk / edits) 11:47, 5 August 2014 (UTC)
- I have the blu-ray of the film. So I will use {{sfn}} and substitute the time parameters. —Indian:BIO · 12:29, 5 August 2014 (UTC)
- I would use loc=00:34 (for example) instead of p=00:34 for sfn - you aren't referencing a page per se. Ritchie333 12:37, 5 August 2014 (UTC)
- I will say this could take some time as KP3D is 93 minutes long. Samjohnzon, do you by any chance have access to the E! special in full? I've only been able to find clips online, and the full video would be useful for determining time parameters. You were the one who added it in this past May, so please do provide a link here if you have one. Snuggums (talk / edits) 03:03, 6 August 2014 (UTC)
- I have added the {{sfn}} for the Katy Perry: Part of Me 3D movie citations. If we have a full link where the E! special is viewable, I can update those too. —Indian:BIO · 06:38, 6 August 2014 (UTC)
- Thank you again :D! With the film now being in the same section as Guinness World Records and biographies by Noam Friedlander, Alice Hudson, and Kimberly Dillon Summers, I'm thinking that should be titled "references" and the other section "footnotes" or "citations". Thoughts? Snuggums (talk / edits) 06:47, 6 August 2014 (UTC)
- I have added the {{sfn}} for the Katy Perry: Part of Me 3D movie citations. If we have a full link where the E! special is viewable, I can update those too. —Indian:BIO · 06:38, 6 August 2014 (UTC)
- I will say this could take some time as KP3D is 93 minutes long. Samjohnzon, do you by any chance have access to the E! special in full? I've only been able to find clips online, and the full video would be useful for determining time parameters. You were the one who added it in this past May, so please do provide a link here if you have one. Snuggums (talk / edits) 03:03, 6 August 2014 (UTC)
- I would use loc=00:34 (for example) instead of p=00:34 for sfn - you aren't referencing a page per se. Ritchie333 12:37, 5 August 2014 (UTC)
- I have the blu-ray of the film. So I will use {{sfn}} and substitute the time parameters. —Indian:BIO · 12:29, 5 August 2014 (UTC)
- Yes, Ian Rose- this is my first FA nomination. Ritchie indeed did some sourcechecking, and so did Chase. The E! Television special will take some searching. IndianBio please do help- I might be able to find some timeframes for KP3D, but don't know how to use those ref formats for film/television. Snuggums (talk / edits) 11:47, 5 August 2014 (UTC)
- @SNUGGUMS:, you can use the {{sfn}} or {{harvnb}} templates for this. Instead of p=294 (indicating pages), you can give p=00:34 (indicating at what time the interview it is sourcing took place in the film). Ask me if you need help. —Indian:BIO · 11:10, 5 August 2014 (UTC)
(→) That would be better. Further reading is a bit ambiguous. —Indian:BIO · 07:11, 6 August 2014 (UTC)
- Implemented. Snuggums (talk / edits) 08:11, 6 August 2014 (UTC)
- SNUGGUMS, I don't have a link to the full E! special, but it is available on YouTube in individual parts. I'm not sure if it'd be convenient to work out the combined times, especially since the first clip doesn't even seem to start at the exact starting time, so we could try and find a different source(s) to replace the special if necessary. S△M 15:31, 7 August 2014 (UTC)
- We might have to look for other sources, Sam. IndianBio, what are your thoughts since you browsed through KP3D to find individual times? Snuggums (talk / edits) 16:37, 7 August 2014 (UTC)
- SNUGGUMS, I don't have a link to the full E! special, but it is available on YouTube in individual parts. I'm not sure if it'd be convenient to work out the combined times, especially since the first clip doesn't even seem to start at the exact starting time, so we could try and find a different source(s) to replace the special if necessary. S△M 15:31, 7 August 2014 (UTC)
Comments from Dank
Support
Resolved concerns from Dank |
---|
Comments. As always, feel free to revert my copyediting. - Dank (push to talk)
|