| Revision as of 19:55, 11 August 2014 view sourceNeotarf (talk | contribs)4,029 edits add link to speech transcript← Previous edit | Revision as of 21:22, 11 August 2014 view source Neotarf (talk | contribs)4,029 editsm add linkNext edit → | ||
| Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
| *]:List of Arbcom cases and requests for 2013 | *]:List of Arbcom cases and requests for 2013 | ||
| *]:Some notes | *]:Some notes | ||
| *] | *] (including link to discussion about "retired" banner) | ||
| *] Wikimania civility speech, August 2014 | *] Wikimania civility speech, August 2014 | ||
Revision as of 21:22, 11 August 2014
Subpages:
- User:Neotarf/Signpost Arbitration Reports 2013 Index of my arb reports, a regular feature I wrote covering the Arbitration Committee for the Signpost during the 2013 arbitration cycle
- User:Neotarf/Arbitration Committee Elections 2013: Neotarf's picks:Slate for 2013 ArbCom elections
- User:Neotarf/EditCounterOptIn.js: Enables edit counter
- User talk:Neotarf/ArbCom 2013:List of Arbcom cases and requests for 2013
- User talk:Neotarf/Arbitration enforcement:Some notes
- User talk:Neotarf/Other stuff (including link to discussion about "retired" banner)
- User talk:Neotarf/Jimbo civility speech transcript Wikimania civility speech, August 2014
Query, and request
Why do you display a "retired" banner, yet continue to contribute? Though I see you don't really work on articles any more. This edit summary shows a real misunderstanding; read NYB's explanation again, more carefully, to see why this sort of argument actually disproves the argument you say you wish to make. I also agree with Bishzilla that we can call out passive-aggressive behaviour such as yours, without breaking NPA or even CIVIL. I think I see what you are trying to do, and I think your intentions are good; but please consider whether your current actions are promoting your avowed aims or holding them back. --John (talk) 09:56, 9 August 2014 (UTC)
Arbitration case request declined
An arbitration case request in which you were named as a party has been declined by the Arbitration Committee. The arbitrators views on hearing this matter, found here, may be useful. For the arbitration committee, --S Philbrick(Talk) 15:14, 11 August 2014 (UTC)