Misplaced Pages

User talk:Homey~enwiki: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 00:31, 5 July 2006 editNagle (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers16,106 edits Israeli Apartheid arbitration← Previous edit Revision as of 00:32, 5 July 2006 edit undoNagle (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers16,106 edits Israeli Apartheid arbitrationNext edit →
Line 1: Line 1:
<blockquote><blockquote><blockquote><blockquote style="background: white; border: solid 2px darkblue; padding: 1em;"><big>Thanks for visiting my Talk: page.
<p>If you are considering posting something to me, please:</big>
<p><b><big>*Post new messages to the bottom of my talk page.</big>
<br><big>*Use headlines when starting new talk topics.</big>
<br><big>*Comment about the content of a specific article on the Talk: page of that article, and not here.</big>
<br><big>*Do not make personal attacks.</b></big>
<p><big>Comments which fail to follow the four rules above may be immediately archived or deleted.
<P>Thanks again for visiting.</big></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote>
] | ] | ] | ]
== Your talk page ==

I'm a bit puzzled- you seem to have a deleted talk page, with no links to archives. Is this correct, and if so why? ] 08:01, 3 July 2006 (UTC)
: Ok, thanks for sorting it out now. ] 14:40, 3 July 2006 (UTC)

== Possible RfC ==

Homey, I'm seriously considering opening an RfC on Jayjg, Humus and SlimVirgin concerning this out-of-process page move. It's conduct that I wouldn't accept from an editor and I'm frankly appalled that fellow administrators should be behaving this way. Any thoughts? -- ] 22:52, 4 July 2006 (UTC)

== Original Research ==

Please stop removing the original research tags. They are there for a reason, and I have at least one editor(Nysin), who has expressed his support on the talk page for my original research concerns. Just because you do not seem to understand the finer points of ] does not give you a license to revert changes. Please re-read ], as I believe you are suffering from a serious misunderstanding as to what makes something original research. ] 22:59, 4 July 2006 (UTC)

== ] arbitration == == ] arbitration ==


The move/revert war issue for ] has been referred to arbitration. See ] --] 00:31, 5 July 2006 (UTC) The move/revert war issue for ] has been referred to arbitration. See ] --] 00:32, 5 July 2006 (UTC)

Revision as of 00:32, 5 July 2006

Thanks for visiting my Talk: page.

If you are considering posting something to me, please:

*Post new messages to the bottom of my talk page.
*Use headlines when starting new talk topics.
*Comment about the content of a specific article on the Talk: page of that article, and not here.
*Do not make personal attacks.

Comments which fail to follow the four rules above may be immediately archived or deleted.

Thanks again for visiting.

Archive 1 | Archive 2 | Archive 3 | June 2006 archive

Your talk page

I'm a bit puzzled- you seem to have a deleted talk page, with no links to archives. Is this correct, and if so why? Petros471 08:01, 3 July 2006 (UTC)

Ok, thanks for sorting it out now. Petros471 14:40, 3 July 2006 (UTC)

Possible RfC

Homey, I'm seriously considering opening an RfC on Jayjg, Humus and SlimVirgin concerning this out-of-process page move. It's conduct that I wouldn't accept from an editor and I'm frankly appalled that fellow administrators should be behaving this way. Any thoughts? -- ChrisO 22:52, 4 July 2006 (UTC)

Original Research

Please stop removing the original research tags. They are there for a reason, and I have at least one editor(Nysin), who has expressed his support on the talk page for my original research concerns. Just because you do not seem to understand the finer points of WP:NOR does not give you a license to revert changes. Please re-read WP:NOR, as I believe you are suffering from a serious misunderstanding as to what makes something original research. Bibigon 22:59, 4 July 2006 (UTC)

Israeli Apartheid arbitration

The move/revert war issue for Israeli Apartheid has been referred to arbitration. See Misplaced Pages:Requests for arbitration#Move and revert warring at Israeli Apartheid --John Nagle 00:32, 5 July 2006 (UTC)