| Revision as of 15:51, 4 July 2006 editRbj (talk | contribs)3,805 edits →i responded on my talk page...← Previous edit | Revision as of 12:52, 5 July 2006 edit undoAndriyK (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers3,870 edits MediationNext edit → | ||
| Line 131: | Line 131: | ||
| ... but there is no evidence of my violating 3RR on ]. i am happy to open this up to other admins (or even arbcom, but i think they would reject a rfar because it is too small potatos) for examination because i am certain that you are mistaken about your judgement regarding this. ] 15:51, 4 July 2006 (UTC) | ... but there is no evidence of my violating 3RR on ]. i am happy to open this up to other admins (or even arbcom, but i think they would reject a rfar because it is too small potatos) for examination because i am certain that you are mistaken about your judgement regarding this. ] 15:51, 4 July 2006 (UTC) | ||
| == Mediation == | |||
| {{RFM-Request|]/]|Neutrality of the word liberate and its derivatives}} | |||
Revision as of 12:52, 5 July 2006
Archives:
3RR
This is a post on my talkpage, I crosspost here to make sure you read it.
After a short wikibreak, I am furious to learn that I had been blocked from editing on the issue of removing warnings from my talkpage, 3RR, and lack of communication. Listed below is a concise and brief explanation.
1. Removing warnings:
A. One is perfectly entitled to remove such warnings from his/her talkpage. An admin support my claim.] Another user removed my warning from his talkpage.]. To add to that the warnings is justified. An admin support my case. ] ] ] support from another user. Read the full length discussion on User:Bishonen talkpage under the heading User:RevolverOcelotX.
B. Even if I am not allowed to remove such warnings, the warning clearly isn't justified. According to the history of List of Chinese Americans and Anti-Secession Law of the People's Republic of China articles, you would see Bonafide.hustla and RevolverOcelotX had both made 3 reverts in the past 24 hours 2 days ago. However, when the initial warning was placed by RevolverOcelotX I made only 1 edit to the article, making the warning totally irrelevant. He placed the warning on the ground that I BROKEN the 3RR on my user talk page after the final warning. As evident in the above discussion, an admin states that 3RR does not apply to a user's personal talkpage. The accusation is groundless.
2. 3RR Again, the 3RR clearly states that a block should only occur if I have made MORE than 3 reverts in the last 24 hrs for an article. I did not unless you count my personal talkpage, but we already established the 3RR does not apply to personal talkpages. See A. and B. above for further details.
3. Lack of communication
A. A series of POV pushing by RevolverOcelotX occured when he first arrived at wikipedia, when I revert his edits as an effort to preserve NPOV (never violating 3RR), he started to engage himself in edit warring with me and many other users ] While I have also posted relevant reasons for reverts in both edit summary and relevant talkpages, he failed to do so. When I attempted to communicate in order to end edit warring, he angrily responded and continue to make POV edits specifically in Taiwanese-Chinese relation. ]
4. Conduct of User:RevolverOcelotX
A. Ever since this user's initial arrival, he has been on a crusade to distort information about Taiwan, China articles. see ].
B. His behavior is similar to User:PoolGuy (who has received an indef. block for bootless wikilawyering and disruption) and often commits wikilawyering. He is in the process of wasting the community's patience. ]
C. This user went as far as harassing admin to support my case in order to prove his point. ]
D. This user even edit the naming convention: Chinese in order to justify his edits. ]
Conclusion: It is obvious that this particular user is a vexatious litigant and the fact that the block on me is not justified. Thanks and I hope someone will restore this unfair treatment.--Bonafide.hustla 23:09, 27 June 2006 (UTC)
3RR block of Bonafide.hustla
Hi, Alex. I saw your block notice on Bonafide.hustla's talkpage and meant to review the block, but I simply didn't have time to dig into his contribs to find the violation. I don't mean to bitch at you, but it would be great if you'd mention specifics in block notices, especially in the case of 3RR, because those really are a bit of a business to find. Anyway, now that BH has protested the block--retroactively--I suppose I really ought to take a look. Could you tell me what page it was about, please? Bishonen | talk 23:58, 27 June 2006 (UTC).
Fair use rationale for Image:Moshkov.jpg
|
Thanks for uploading Image:Moshkov.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Misplaced Pages articles constitutes fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.
If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Misplaced Pages page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. —Bkell (talk) 07:33, 28 June 2006 (UTC)
Lazar Kaganovich edit war
Thank you for temp-blocking User:Rastishka from editing. The whole thing is becoming completely ridiculous.
Year Vandalism
"Looks like a content dispute to me. Japanese years are named after the Emperors and we do not know who will be the Emperor in e.g. 2037. Warn him not to disrupt. List is empty)"
Interesting. That didn't occur to me. Thanks
Major Achivements
Here comes the Spiderman!
(Misplaced Pages:No climbing the Reichstag dressed as Spiderman)
I have threatened to climb the Reichstag, dressed up as and did so, became bollocked from editing for violating Misplaced Pages policy against climbing the Reichstag dressed as Spiderman, and then had it become an official policy on Misplaced Pages (and to be an official decree by the Supreme Cabal Regime of the English Misplaced Pages (SCREW)). Is Absolutley fantasitic!. This is so great!
"In extreme cases editors may be tempted to climb the Reichstag building dressed as Spiderman in order to promote their cause. This is absolutely forbidden and can result in an indefinite block from editing Misplaced Pages."
Nor on Tower bridge either.
This single event is a great example of all the good qualities of our beloved Misplaced Pages! Horay!
Next stop: The Kremlin!
Thankyou! Dfrg.msc 08:19, 29 June 2006 (UTC)
comfort women
user: dollarfifty is at it again on this page. Can you help?--Blog Mav Rick 23:18, 29 June 2006 (UTC)
Rastishka
He's at it again on Lazar Kaganovich. Maybe we need some kind of mediation. Help please? TheQuandry 03:37, 1 July 2006 (UTC)
Re:Unblock
Heh, well, ususally I don't block like that but when you redirect an article toward "Nigger"... I'll consider an unblock pending his response... :-) Cheers. Sasquatch t|c 04:08, 2 July 2006 (UTC)
Unblocking 202.21.158.12
Firstly, thanks for unblocking my IP. However, it is a school IP and thus it is not possible to work from another IP. ZhongHan 06:59, 3 July 2006 (UTC)
Your summary at Misplaced Pages:Requests_for_comment/Irpen
Your summary at Misplaced Pages:Requests_for_comment/Irpen misinforms the community. You wrote about Russian architecture "There is no discussion on the talk page, no suggestions on improving the article". In fact there was (and still is) a discussion and solution has been proposed. (Please see Misplaced Pages:Requests_for_comment/Irpen#Comment_to_the_summary_by_Alex_Bakharev_and_others). I suugest you to reformulate your summary.--AndriyK 08:40, 3 July 2006 (UTC)
- I think my summary is adequate. I fail to see any meaningful discussion and proposals to improve the article on the talk page at least in the last few months (even if consider your proposal to divide and remove made in November in 2005 as made in the good faith). abakharev 09:53, 3 July 2006 (UTC)
Chechnya
You must be very busy now. But can I draw your attention to the fact that in Chechnya User:Ewen Le Gloan-Korenyuk has again deleted the pro-Russian links, although; having read your comment to him, I added "Kadyrov site" to the free Ru one.
I thought I had once seen this guy's name (who must be living in France or Switzerland according to google) on French Wiki, but strangely enough he is (now?) absent there. But he does have accounts on both Norwegian Wikis, as recent as the English one. On bokmal, apart from Chechnya external links, he corrected two misprints and changed one number 14 into "fourteen". On nynorsk, he only did Chechnya external links, already got reverted, but that did not bother him: I do not want to get in an edit war with this guy, but surely he cannot delete these links so that the pro-separatist side is overrepresented, while there is also Chechen Republic of Ichkeria to put all that stuff.--Pan Gerwazy 01:40, 4 July 2006 (UTC)
i responded on my talk page...
... but there is no evidence of my violating 3RR on homophobia. i am happy to open this up to other admins (or even arbcom, but i think they would reject a rfar because it is too small potatos) for examination because i am certain that you are mistaken about your judgement regarding this. r b-j 15:51, 4 July 2006 (UTC)
Mediation
 | This user page is currently inactive and is retained for historical reference. If you want to revive discussion regarding the subject, you might try contacting the user in question or seeking broader input via a forum such as the village pump. |
 | Misplaced Pages:Requests for mediation/OpenNote is deprecated. Please see User:MediationBot/Opened message instead. |