Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license.
Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat.
We can research this topic together.
This disambiguation page is within the scope of WikiProject Disambiguation, an attempt to structure and organize all disambiguation pages on Misplaced Pages. If you wish to help, you can edit the page attached to this talk page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project or contribute to the discussion.DisambiguationWikipedia:WikiProject DisambiguationTemplate:WikiProject DisambiguationDisambiguation
This disambiguation page is part of WikiProject Eastern Orthodoxy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to the Eastern Orthodox Church. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. You may also want to look at the current collaboration of the month or the project's notice board.Eastern OrthodoxyWikipedia:WikiProject Eastern OrthodoxyTemplate:WikiProject Eastern OrthodoxyEastern Orthodoxy
Estonian Orthodox Church is part of WikiProject Estonia, a project to maintain and expand Estonia-related subjects on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.EstoniaWikipedia:WikiProject EstoniaTemplate:WikiProject EstoniaEstonia
The story of religious persecution is not even POV; it's just plain wrong.
The facts of the matter are that the Moscow Patriarchate's church attempted to get itself registered under the very same name already used by the Constantinople Patriarchate's church. Name duplication is not allowed by law, and for a good reason -- and the church refused for years to consider having another name, instead finding it more profitable to make nonsense claims of persecution in media. Digwuren07:05, 14 June 2007 (UTC)
Please don't put this prosecution text back. It's definitely not a place for the disambiguation page. The problem is more complex, and it should be discussed on the main article controversy section. Adding this text here is just childish mud throwing and serves no good purpose in ecyclopedia. Suva10:29, 14 June 2007 (UTC)
I agree with this edit by User:Alexia Death. The original version was NPOV. Someone however insisted on adding a mentions on the "legality" of the smaller church. If we include the legality of one side on the split, then we must also include the illegality of the other side of the split. Saying "illegal" or "underground church" would however be POV. The encyclopedic way of expressing the situation is "religious persecution". -- Petri Krohn18:14, 14 June 2007 (UTC)
Put it in the articles where they are countered in sensibel fashon. Current form is completley neutral, sol ets agree on not messing with it?--Alexia Death11:30, 14 June 2007 (UTC)
Nationalist myths about "Tharbata" and the 5th-century fort-building Estonians will not be tolerated. We should beware of fringecruft. --Ghirla12:06, 14 June 2007 (UTC)
I'm glad, you agree. You need to provide sources for those believer counts tho. Not here but in the articles. I left them in place for the readers but they must come from somewhere, and when sourced the rough numbers can be replaced with more exact ones... When that is done I see no need to modify this page.--Alexia Death12:28, 14 June 2007 (UTC)
Imagine that. Does someone want to write an article detailing the tension between these two? It would be nice to have such an article in the See also section of this page, so users who thought there to be only one church can get the story. Taemyr00:36, 17 June 2007 (UTC)
