| Revision as of 07:01, 5 July 2006 editHumus sapiens (talk | contribs)27,653 edits →[] arbitration← Previous edit | Revision as of 01:04, 6 July 2006 edit undoSlimVirgin (talk | contribs)172,064 edits RfMNext edit → | ||
| Line 26: | Line 26: | ||
| : Whether you admit/want it or not, you are an involved party. This case is not about today only. ←] <sup>]</sup> 07:01, 5 July 2006 (UTC) | : Whether you admit/want it or not, you are an involved party. This case is not about today only. ←] <sup>]</sup> 07:01, 5 July 2006 (UTC) | ||
| == RfM == | |||
| {{RFM-Request|]|Apartheid (disambiguation)}}] <sup><font color="Purple">]</font></sup> 01:04, 6 July 2006 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 01:04, 6 July 2006
Thanks for visiting my Talk: page.
If you are considering posting something to me, please:
*Post new messages to the bottom of my talk page.
*Use headlines when starting new talk topics.
*Comment about the content of a specific article on the Talk: page of that article, and not here.
*Do not make personal attacks.Comments which fail to follow the four rules above may be immediately archived or deleted.
Thanks again for visiting.
Archive 1 | Archive 2 | Archive 3 | June 2006 archive
Your talk page
I'm a bit puzzled- you seem to have a deleted talk page, with no links to archives. Is this correct, and if so why? Petros471 08:01, 3 July 2006 (UTC)
- Ok, thanks for sorting it out now. Petros471 14:40, 3 July 2006 (UTC)
Possible RfC
Homey, I'm seriously considering opening an RfC on Jayjg, Humus and SlimVirgin concerning this out-of-process page move. It's conduct that I wouldn't accept from an editor and I'm frankly appalled that fellow administrators should be behaving this way. Any thoughts? -- ChrisO 22:52, 4 July 2006 (UTC)
Original Research
Please stop removing the original research tags. They are there for a reason, and I have at least one editor(Nysin), who has expressed his support on the talk page for my original research concerns. Just because you do not seem to understand the finer points of WP:NOR does not give you a license to revert changes. Please re-read WP:NOR, as I believe you are suffering from a serious misunderstanding as to what makes something original research. Bibigon 22:59, 4 July 2006 (UTC)
Israeli Apartheid arbitration
The move/revert war issue for Israeli Apartheid has been referred to arbitration. See Misplaced Pages:Requests for arbitration#Move and revert warring at Israeli Apartheid --John Nagle 00:32, 5 July 2006 (UTC)
- Whether you admit/want it or not, you are an involved party. This case is not about today only. ←Humus sapiens 07:01, 5 July 2006 (UTC)
RfM
 | This user page is currently inactive and is retained for historical reference. If you want to revive discussion regarding the subject, you might try contacting the user in question or seeking broader input via a forum such as the village pump. |
 | Misplaced Pages:Requests for mediation/OpenNote is deprecated. Please see User:MediationBot/Opened message instead. |