| Revision as of 03:17, 24 August 2014 editQuackGuru (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users79,978 edits archive← Previous edit | Revision as of 07:51, 27 August 2014 edit undoMiddle 8 (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users8,216 edits ns: AGF, de-escalationNext edit → | ||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
| |archive = User talk:QuackGuru/Archive %(counter)d | |archive = User talk:QuackGuru/Archive %(counter)d | ||
| }} | }} | ||
| ==AGF, de-escalation== | |||
| I think you and I seriously need to bury the hatchet and move forward. Whatever issues you have with my editing, please tell me, and I'll try to address your concerns. I've posted on my ] and elsewhere about instances where I've felt you've acted in an underhanded manner. I think you have some idea of what I'm talking about, and hope you take it to heart. | |||
| On the issue of AGF (cf. ), you could heed ], which would mean, e.g., not nitpicking good evidence that seems "pro"-acu (as you did ] with A1Candidate's review article), and not arguing to include poorer evidence that's "anti"-acu (which is what you did last month with Moffet; see Alexbrn's mention of WP:FRIND in ]). Do you see what I mean? --] <small>(] • ])</small> 07:51, 27 August 2014 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 07:51, 27 August 2014
| This is a Misplaced Pages user talk page. This is not an encyclopedia article or the talk page for an encyclopedia article. If you find this page on any site other than Misplaced Pages, you are viewing a mirror site. Be aware that the page may be outdated and that the user whom this page is about may have no personal affiliation with any site other than Misplaced Pages. The original talk page is located at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:QuackGuru. |
AGF, de-escalation
I think you and I seriously need to bury the hatchet and move forward. Whatever issues you have with my editing, please tell me, and I'll try to address your concerns. I've posted on my talk page and elsewhere about instances where I've felt you've acted in an underhanded manner. I think you have some idea of what I'm talking about, and hope you take it to heart.
On the issue of AGF (cf. ), you could heed WP:OPPONENT, which would mean, e.g., not nitpicking good evidence that seems "pro"-acu (as you did above with A1Candidate's review article), and not arguing to include poorer evidence that's "anti"-acu (which is what you did last month with Moffet; see Alexbrn's mention of WP:FRIND in archived talk). Do you see what I mean? --Middle 8 (POV-pushing • COI) 07:51, 27 August 2014 (UTC)