| Revision as of 20:20, 28 August 2014 editFlyer22 Frozen (talk | contribs)365,630 editsm Commas.← Previous edit | Revision as of 14:20, 29 August 2014 edit undoTutelary (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers17,196 edits →A barnstar for you!: new WikiLove messageTag: wikiloveNext edit → | ||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
| ::I see. Thanks for explaining. WP:MEDRS makes exceptions for cases where few reviews are being published; see ], if you haven't already. And remember that you can also cite book sources, which can be secondary sources. For example, to cite Buisson's research in the Clitoris and G-spot articles, I provided book sources noting her research in addition to a primary source to her research. ] (]) 16:17, 20 August 2014 (UTC) | ::I see. Thanks for explaining. WP:MEDRS makes exceptions for cases where few reviews are being published; see ], if you haven't already. And remember that you can also cite book sources, which can be secondary sources. For example, to cite Buisson's research in the Clitoris and G-spot articles, I provided book sources noting her research in addition to a primary source to her research. ] (]) 16:17, 20 August 2014 (UTC) | ||
| == A barnstar for you! == | |||
| {| style="background-color: #fdffe7; border: 1px solid #fceb92;" | |||
| |rowspan="2" style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 5px;" | ] | |||
| |style="font-size: x-large; padding: 3px 3px 0 3px; height: 1.5em;" | '''The Original Barnstar''' | |||
| |- | |||
| |style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 3px;" | For going up against the machine and attempting to improve medicine articles with good sources, even if you're reverted. We need more people like you. ] (]) 14:20, 29 August 2014 (UTC) | |||
| |} | |||
Revision as of 14:20, 29 August 2014
Adding sources
Hello, Yohan Castel. When you add sources, as you did here and here, make sure that you mostly rely on WP:Secondary sources; you have been relying on primary sources, and, as the WP:Secondary sources link shows, Misplaced Pages prefers secondary sources. Per Misplaced Pages:Identifying reliable sources (medicine) (WP:MEDRS), this is especially true in the case of biomedical information; for example, your contributions to the Sex differences in psychology and Mechanics of human sexuality articles. Primary sources are sometimes okay, especially if they are used as adjunct to secondary sources, but they are particularly generally discouraged for biomedical information. As for your latter edit above, I tweaked it here; these studies are suggesting matters, not necessarily proving anything (not without the findings being replicated in other research) and, as noted in the Clitoris and G-spot articles, Buisson is more so stating that the G-spot is nothing but the clitoris; see, for example, this LiveScience article. Flyer22 (talk) 12:34, 20 August 2014 (UTC)
- Yes of course, systematic reviews or pluridisciplinary work are generally better. But for play behavior to my knowledge there are too few studies for systematic reviews. Only two I think about the topic of primates playing with human toys. And only one with fetal testosterone samples in human. I added these sources because I thought there were interesting. And I'm not able to write sophisticated analysis or argumentations, as english is not my native language. Yohan Castel (talk) 15:30, 20 August 2014 (UTC)
- I see. Thanks for explaining. WP:MEDRS makes exceptions for cases where few reviews are being published; see Misplaced Pages:Identifying reliable sources (medicine)#Use up-to-date evidence, if you haven't already. And remember that you can also cite book sources, which can be secondary sources. For example, to cite Buisson's research in the Clitoris and G-spot articles, I provided book sources noting her research in addition to a primary source to her research. Flyer22 (talk) 16:17, 20 August 2014 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
|
The Original Barnstar |
| For going up against the machine and attempting to improve medicine articles with good sources, even if you're reverted. We need more people like you. Tutelary (talk) 14:20, 29 August 2014 (UTC) |