Misplaced Pages

Revision as of 19:09, 4 September 2014

• WP:AN/3
• WP:AN3
• WP:AN/EW
• WP:ANEW
• WP:AN/3RR

This page is for reporting active edit warriors and recent violations of restrictions like the three-revert rule.

• See this guide for instructions on creating diffs for this report.
• If you see that a user may be about to violate the three-revert rule, consider warning them by placing {{subst:uw-3rr}} on their user talk page.

You must notify any user you have reported.

You may use {{subst:An3-notice}} ~~~~ to do so.

You can subscribe to a web feed of this page in either RSS or Atom format.

Additional notes

• When reporting a user here, your own behavior will also be scrutinized. Be sure you understand WP:REVERT and the definitions below first.
• The format and contents of a 3RR/1RR report are important, use the "Click here to create a new report" button below to have a report template with the necessary fields to work from.
• Possible alternatives to filing here are dispute resolution, or a request for page protection.
• Violations of other restrictions, like WP:1RR violations, may also be brought here. Your report should include two reverts that occurred within a 24-hour period, and a link to where the 1RR restriction was imposed.

Definition of edit warring

Definition of the three-revert rule (3RR)

Sections older than 48 hours are archived by Lowercase sigmabot III.

Twinkle's ARV can be used on the user's page to more easily report their behavior, including automatic handling of diffs.

Click here to create a new report

User:Oldschooldsl reported by User:Tutelary (Result: Warned)

Page

Endurance International Group (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

User being reported

Oldschooldsl (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Previous version reverted to

Diffs of the user's reverts

1. 05:06, 31 August 2014 (UTC) "Undid revision 623533065 by Tutelary (talk) --- Does not apply, because this is a historical fact concerning the worldwide web"
2. Consecutive edits made from 04:04, 31 August 2014 (UTC) to 04:06, 31 August 2014 (UTC)
   1. 04:04, 31 August 2014 (UTC) "Undid revision 623532029 by Tutelary (talk) ------- This is historically accurate. Why the agenda to remove it?"
   2. 04:06, 31 August 2014 (UTC) "Undid revision 623532113 by Tutelary (talk)"
3. 04:01, 31 August 2014 (UTC) "Undid revision 623531572 by Tutelary (talk)"
4. 03:52, 31 August 2014 (UTC) "Undid revision 613515646 by Tutelary (talk)"

Diffs of edit warring / 3RR warning

1. 04:05, 31 August 2014 (UTC) "Warning: Edit warring. (TW)"

Diffs of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page

1. 04:12, 31 August 2014 (UTC) "r"
2. 04:13, 31 August 2014 (UTC) ""
3. 04:13, 31 August 2014 (UTC) "/* Edit Warring */"
4. 04:31, 31 August 2014 (UTC) "/* Edit Warring Follow Up */ r"

Comments:

This editor has previously not edited for over three years (since 2011) but has since taken a vested interest in this exact topic. This is a content dispute; and I will admit that, but they're already at 5RR and I feel that only a block for edit warring will get them to discuss their changes rather than to continuously revert. Thanks. Tutelary (talk) 13:58, 31 August 2014 (UTC)

• Comment When I saw the last revert this morning, I left the user a message stating that he had violated 3RR and inviting him to self-revert. That message got no response; it's been nine hours since the user's last edit. I've reinstated the tag that was deleted from the article. Personally, I'm inclined to wait until the user's next edit to act. If he engages in discussion, we have no problem. If it's a revert, then he's saying by actions that he intends to continue to edit war, and a block to prevent further disruption is warranted. —C.Fred (talk) 14:07, 31 August 2014 (UTC)

C.Fred

It is true that I have not edited a page since 2011. I don't usually see a need to get involved in WikiPedia. In fact, I'll confess my ignorance in that I don't exactly know how to use it or else I would have reported the user Tutelary from the beginning (something I don't even know how to do). Editing WikiPedia is somewhat complicated and there is so much "shortcode" that I find myself lost.

However my inexperience or lack of activity or even lack of seniority is irrelevant in the quest for obtaining historical factual information, which is what WikiPedia is all about. And someone writing and erasing history is not what an Encyclopedia is for. WikiPedia defines an encyclopaedia as:

An encyclopedia or encyclopaedia (also spelled encyclopædia, see spelling differences) is a type of reference work or compendium holding a comprehensive summary of information from either all branches of knowledge or a particular branch of knowledge. Encyclopedias are divided into articles or entries, which are usually accessed alphabetically by article name. Encyclopedia entries are longer and more detailed than those in most dictionaries. Generally speaking, unlike dictionary entries, which focus on linguistic information about words, encyclopedia articles focus on factual information to cover the thing or concept for which the article name stands. https://en.wikipedia.org/Encyclopedia

The argue made by Tutelary is that when X site goes down its not historical enough to warrant an entry and on the face value principle he would be right, except for the fact that we're not talking about a single website or even a small provider. When a large provider essentially becomes part of the backbone of the internet and its network outage takes offline so much of the internet that CNN, ABC, CBS actually do a report on it... That is something else. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Oldschooldsl (talk • contribs) 16:44, 31 August 2014 (UTC)

• Result: User:Oldschooldsl is warned for violating WP:3RR on 31 August. If he continues to revert the article before getting consensus on the talk page he may be blocked without further warning. EdJohnston (talk) 03:57, 2 September 2014 (UTC)

User:Matt 20123 reported by User:Theironminer (Result: )

Page: User talk:Matt 20123 (edit | subject | history | links | watch | logs)
User being reported: Matt 20123 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

.

Previous version reverted to:

Diffs of the user's reverts:

Diff of edit warring / 3RR warning:

Diff of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page:

Comments:

This user continued to remove sections on his talk page without replying. My section stated that his edits were inappropriate and should leave a summary of his edits. I tried telling the user he can just reply after he removed the section, yet he removed it again. I then gave him a notice that I'm reporting him

— Preceding unsigned comment added by Theironminer (talk • contribs) 06:06, 1 September 2014 (UTC)

User once again removed section from talk page with no response. - Theironminer (talk) 19:33, 2 September 2014 (UTC)

User:SLBedit reported by User:Rpo.castro (Result: Warned)

Page: List of football clubs in Portugal by major honours won (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
User being reported: SLBedit (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Previous version reverted to: original

Diffs of the user's reverts (last ones only):

1. 1
2. 2
3. 3
4. 4

Diff of edit warring / 3RR warning:

Diff of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page:

Comments:

This edit war started today (first against other user). It looked like to be over, but seems not. The question seems to be using the historical or the comercial designation of a trophy. User:SLBedit don't looks like on a mood to expose his arguments on the talk page, just reverting the editions to prove his POV. After the 3rr warning, he copied it onto my own talk page Rpo.castro (talk) 21:04, 1 September 2014 (UTC)

• Result: User:SLBedit is warned. They may be blocked without further notice if they continue to revert at List of football clubs in Portugal by major honours won without getting consensus on Talk for their change. EdJohnston (talk) 19:38, 3 September 2014 (UTC)

User:Gringoladomenega reported by User:Qed237 (Result: )

Page

Atlético Madrid (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

User being reported

Gringoladomenega (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Previous version reverted to

Diffs of the user's reverts

1. Consecutive edits made from 23:51, 1 September 2014 (UTC) to 23:53, 1 September 2014 (UTC)
   1. 23:51, 1 September 2014 (UTC) ""
   2. 23:53, 1 September 2014 (UTC) ""
2. 23:48, 1 September 2014 (UTC) "Griezmann is a left winger! In European media, including the English, he is known as João Miranda."
3. 23:43, 1 September 2014 (UTC) "http://www.mirror.co.uk/sport/football/transfer-news/joao-miranda-set-manchester-united-3673176 and http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/football/article-2654243/Manchester-United-target-Miranda-reveals-talks-English-Spanish-clubs.html"
4. 22:45, 1 September 2014 (UTC) ""
5. 16:32, 1 September 2014 (UTC) ""
6. 11:56, 1 September 2014 (UTC) "Ángel Correa not part of the first team"
7. 11:18, 1 September 2014 (UTC) ""
8. 00:50, 1 September 2014 (UTC) ""
9. 23:28, 31 August 2014 (UTC) ""
10. 23:19, 31 August 2014 (UTC) "Griezmann is a winger; # 23 is known in Spain as João Miranda; # 25 is known by the nickname Bono."
11. 23:03, 31 August 2014 (UTC) ""

Diffs of edit warring / 3RR warning

1. 23:35, 1 September 2014 (UTC) "Warning: Disruptive editing on Atlético Madrid. (TW)"

Diffs of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page

Comments:

He has made many hidden reverts (against multiple editors) adding name to player and changing position without any discussion. The source (officiall club webpage) of the squad he makes changes to says one thing and he wants an other thing for the player names. Now he even moved page Miranda (footballer) to João Miranda (footballer) just to be able to add the player name in Athletico article. Has history of edit warring and vandalism (blocked three times in six months). He also went to talk page of one of the other editors User talk:83.84.245.25 and added warning I gave to him (including a diff of his incorrect edit). Does not seem to understand he should not edit war and cant always get his ideas through. QED237 (talk) 00:06, 2 September 2014 (UTC)

Attempt to warn/inform on his talkpage had no affect and prevoius history told me he would not listen. QED237 (talk) 00:09, 2 September 2014 (UTC)

And now the editor has even moved the article for Miranda again. Wow, does he not know he should not move articles unless they are not controversial and definately not move again. QED237 (talk) 00:12, 2 September 2014 (UTC)

Hello friends. First, it became something personal to you Qed237. Incidentally, it is not true that I did not answer him, just to see his talk page. Look at my edits, I'm not a thug. I try to maintain consistency in my edits. Know much Spanish championship. In several seasons at the Royal Society and in the first game with Atletico Madrid, Antoine Griezmann has been a true winger, listed as MF. Many advanced players are listed as forwards, but really, he's a winger. Regarding Miranda, actually many sources cite him as João Miranda (http://www.mirror.co.uk/sport/football/transfer-news/joao-miranda-set-manchester-united-3673176) and (http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/football/article-2654243/Manchester-United-target-Miranda-reveals-talks-English-Spanish-clubs.html), so it is common sense that your full name is listed, after all, Miranda is his last name and not his surname. Greetings User:Gringoladomenegatalk 2 September 2014 (UTC)

You gave one very minor explanation at my talk, I responded, and then nothing. You should discuss and not just leave one message practically saying "I am right" and then never speak again. That is not how a discussion works. Secondly why are you adding links to other sources and not accepting the source used for the squad which is the team official webpage, that list Miranda for the brazilian player and has Griezmann as a forward (yes a winger can be a forward for example in a 4-3-3). Thirdly a page move shouild NEVER be done when a dispute then go and do a requested move to find consensus before moving pages. And even if you believe you are right you are never allowed to do all those reverts anyway. QED237 (talk) 21:21, 2 September 2014 (UTC)

And you say common sense to use last name, that is not true for brazilian players i.e. Robinho, Ronaldinho and so on. QED237 (talk) 21:22, 2 September 2014 (UTC)

User:Discospinster reported by User:101.163.108.17 (Result: Reporter blocked)

Page: 2014 celebrity pictures hack (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
User being reported: Discospinster (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Previous version reverted to:

Diffs of the user's reverts:

Diff of edit warring / 3RR warning:

Diff of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page:

Comments:

Removal of external links relevant to the topic. Links in no way violate any Misplaced Pages policy, clearly this user is just a silly kid getting his kicks by vandalising and edit warring. 101.163.108.17 (talk) 14:13, 2 September 2014 (UTC)

WP:ELNEVER and WP:ELNO point #3. We don't post links to stolen material. Grow up. --NeilN 14:18, 2 September 2014 (UTC)

• Comment Reporter already appropriately blocked by Discospinster. We don't link to stolen personal images per ELNO, BLP and common decency. Acroterion (talk) 14:22, 2 September 2014 (UTC)

User:STATicVapor (Result: no action, not edit warring)

Please can one of you guys sort out STATicVapor; he has been coming across uncivil; he had reverted my edits on 808's & Heartbreak and has called me a sock, and has caused a bit of fuss with Scorpion0422 as Scorpion wrote on STATicVapor's talk page reverting of this edit was completely wrong. Yes, the IP was a little harsh but he was completely in the right and using language does not necessarily mean he is a vandal. If you had done even the smallest amount of research (ie. Just looking at the wrestler's Misplaced Pages page) you would see that The Ultimate Warrior's birth name is indeed James Hellwig and not Warrior (or, you could have just used common sense). I suggest that in the future you exercise some restraint with your itchy revert finger and make sure you aren't re-adding factual inaccuracies. -- Scorpion0422 20:17, 2 September 2014 (UTC) and accused Scorpion0422 of being uncivil when that editor is being uncivil; when I asked them why did they revert my edits they reverted my edit again, in a nutshell they are a continue page edit warrior/genre warrior/vandal Harmony-n-Beatz (talk) 20:39, 2 September 2014 (UTC)

And also made a personal attack to BlaccCrab Harmony-n-Beatz (talk) 20:41, 2 September 2014 (UTC)

ANI Is thataway Amortias (T)(C) 20:45, 2 September 2014 (UTC)

• No violation As Amortias said, this is not the venue for your concerns. —C.Fred (talk) 20:47, 2 September 2014 (UTC)

The reporter is at 4RR. --‖ Ebyabe - Inspector General ‖ 21:10, 2 September 2014 (UTC)

The reporter has been blocked as a sock by User:Diannaa. EdJohnston (talk) 17:38, 3 September 2014 (UTC)

User:46.36.38.75 reported by User:Thomas.W (Result:Blocked for 48hrs )

Page

Ekk Nayi Pehchaan (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

User being reported

46.36.38.75 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Previous version reverted to

Diffs of the user's reverts

1. 11:21, 3 September 2014 (UTC) "removing vandalise by Philip Trueman (talk) and multipal account of user:theredpenofdoom"
2. 11:11, 3 September 2014 (UTC) "removing vandalise by TheRedPenOfDoom (talk)"
3. 11:03, 3 September 2014 (UTC) "removing vandalise by TheRedPenOfDoom (talk)"
4. 10:54, 3 September 2014 (UTC) "removing vandalise by TheRedPenOfDoom (talk)"
5. 10:47, 3 September 2014 (UTC) "removing vandalise by TheRedPenOfDoom (talk)"

Diffs of edit warring / 3RR warning

Diffs of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page

Comments:

IP revertwarring to keep totally unsourced fancruft etc (which judging by style, level of English etc most probably are copyright violations) in an article about an Indian TV series. Thomas.W 11:50, 3 September 2014 (UTC)

Blocked for 48 hours. Yunshui _水 11:53, 3 September 2014 (UTC

User:TheRedPenOfDoom reported by User:178.62.21.133 (Result: Semi)

Diffs of edit warring / 3RR warning

Page

Ekk Nayi Pehchaan (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

User being reported

TheRedPenOfDoom (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Previous version reverted to

Diffs of the user's reverts

— Preceding unsigned comment added by 178.62.21.133 (talk) 14:34, 3 September 2014 (UTC)

what the action do user TheRedPenofDoom is also involed in edit war more than 10 times he reverted https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Ekk_Nayi_Pehchaan&action=history so take the action also him 178.62.59.70 (talk) 13:17, 3 September 2014 (UTC)

No, he was removing your sock's vandalism. _Fortuna 17:40, 3 September 2014 (UTC)

• Result: Semiprotected by User:Yunshui. EdJohnston (talk) 17:45, 3 September 2014 (UTC)

User:206.19.188.252 reported by User:This lousy T-shirt (Result: 24 hours)

Page

IPhone 6 (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

User being reported

206.19.188.252 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Previous version reverted to

Diffs of the user's reverts

1. 16:06, 3 September 2014 (UTC) "Undid revision 624027933 by This lousy T-shirt (talk)"
2. 16:05, 3 September 2014 (UTC) "Undid revision 624027656 by This lousy T-shirt (talk)"
3. 16:03, 3 September 2014 (UTC) ""
4. 19:31, 2 September 2014 (UTC) ""

Diffs of edit warring / 3RR warning

1. 16:04, 3 September 2014 (UTC) "General note: Unconstructive editing on IPhone 6. (TW)"
2. 16:06, 3 September 2014 (UTC) "Caution: Unconstructive editing on IPhone 6. (TW)"

Diffs of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page

Comments:

This user keeps nominating this redirect page for deletion as a test page! —This lousy T-shirt— (talk) 16:09, 3 September 2014 (UTC)

• Note IP has not been warned specifically about 3RR/edit warring. Leaving warning now. —C.Fred (talk) 16:11, 3 September 2014 (UTC)

• Blocked – for a period of 24 hours —C.Fred (talk) 16:18, 3 September 2014 (UTC)

User:DonEladio reported by User:Yobol (Result: )

Page

Vaccine controversies (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

User being reported

DonEladio (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Previous version reverted to

Diffs of the user's reverts

1. 15:47, 4 September 2014 (UTC) "/* MMR vaccine */ MEDRS has no bearing on news stories. Removed the Blaze and inserted CNN in its place and added additional information"
2. 16:22, 4 September 2014 (UTC) "Undid revision 624171393 by Yobol (talk) undoing whitewashing. See talk page on THIS article"
3. 16:42, 4 September 2014 (UTC) "Undid revision 624175067 by Dawn Bard (talk)consensus? I'm not part of your consensus."
4. 16:50, 4 September 2014 (UTC) "Undid revision 624177448 by Yobol (talk) Count zero editors willing to respond on this article's talk page."

Diffs of edit warring / 3RR warning

See here

Diffs of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page

I'm trying. Cheers, Dawn Bard (talk) 17:15, 4 September 2014 (UTC)

Comments:

User:91.154.96.7 reported by User:IPadPerson (Result: )

Page

Gwen Stefani (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

User being reported

91.154.96.7 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Previous version reverted to

Diffs of the user's reverts

1. 19:28, 3 September 2014 (UTC) "Undid revision 623663915 by IPadPerson (talk) Reverting without proper reason. Vandalism."
2. 11:27, 4 September 2014 (UTC) "Undid revision 624073680 by IPadPerson (talk) Are u blind? Why are u reverting stuff? They are sourcered!"
3. Consecutive edits made from 15:08, 4 September 2014 (UTC) to 18:25, 4 September 2014 (UTC)
   1. 15:08, 4 September 2014 (UTC) "Undid revision 624157161 by IPadPerson (talk)"
   2. 18:25, 4 September 2014 (UTC) "Undid revision 624166451 by 91.154.96.7 (talk) Why are you removing info, which is sourcered. What is your reason?"

Diffs of edit warring / 3RR warning

1. 13:45, 4 September 2014 (UTC) "Warning: Edit warring on Gwen Stefani. (TW)"

Diffs of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page

Comments:

User is fraudalently adding the same disruptive material while ignoring my request for IP to knock it off. I suggest that he/she be blocked so that person can leave me alone and stop with these threats. IPadPerson (talk) 19:09, 4 September 2014 (UTC)

• Misplaced Pages noticeboards
• Misplaced Pages edit warring