Misplaced Pages

:Sockpuppet investigations/Spikequeen: Difference between revisions - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< Misplaced Pages:Sockpuppet investigations Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 19:07, 4 September 2014 editLtPowers (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers30,800 edits Comments by other users← Previous edit Revision as of 02:21, 5 September 2014 edit undoAromavic (talk | contribs)20 edits 04 September 2014Next edit →
Line 10: Line 10:
* {{checkuser|1=DinkyExpress}} * {{checkuser|1=DinkyExpress}}
* {{checkuser|1=Verydinky}} * {{checkuser|1=Verydinky}}
* {{checkuser|1=Ad Orientem}}
* {{checkip|1=69.22.228.31}} * {{checkip|1=69.22.228.31}}



Revision as of 02:21, 5 September 2014

Spikequeen

Spikequeen (talk · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log· investigate · cuwiki)

For archived investigations, see Misplaced Pages:Sockpuppet investigations/Spikequeen/Archive.


04 September 2014

– A user has requested CheckUser. An SPI clerk will shortly look at the case and endorse or decline the request.

Suspected sockpuppets

Creating multiple usernames to argue case for the page Amanda Eliasch against speedy deletion when multiple genuine users have already made the case and deleted this page over five times in the past. All usernames send similar messages (eg same spelling mistakes) and make the same irrelevant argument cases. These sockpuppets frequently engage in editing wars - please see edit history for page Amanda Eliasch.Aromavic (talk) 16:43, 4 September 2014 (UTC) Aromavic (talk) 16:43, 4 September 2014 (UTC)

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims. For a user whose only edits have involved various attempts to delete the article in question, it didn't take Aromavic long to figure out how to open up an SPI. Powers 19:07, 4 September 2014 (UTC)

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

Categories: