| Revision as of 12:52, 8 September 2014 edit87.91.50.226 (talk) →Identifying the ḥillazon← Previous edit | Revision as of 13:01, 8 September 2014 edit undo87.91.50.226 (talk) →Murex trunculusNext edit → | ||
| Line 76: | Line 76: | ||
| ====''Murex trunculus''==== | ====''Murex trunculus''==== | ||
| ] shows how a piece of ], dipped into the solution for the dye, turns blue in sunlight]] | ] shows how a piece of ], dipped into the solution for the dye, turns blue in sunlight]] | ||
| In his doctoral thesis (London, 1913) on the subject, Rabbi Herzog named ''Murex trunculus'' as the most likely candidate for the dye's source. Though ''M. trunculus'' fulfilled many of the Talmudic criteria, Rabbi Herzog's inability to consistently obtain blue dye (sometimes the dye was purple) from the snail precluded him from declaring it to be the dye source. In the 1980s, Otto Elsner,<ref>{{cite web|title=What Color Was Tekhelet?|url=http://www.biblicalarchaeology.org/daily/ancient-cultures/what-color-was-tekhelet/|accessdate=20 January 2014|author=Robin Ngo|date=9/11/2013|month=September|year=2013|quote=Decades after Herzog’s death, chemist Otto Elsner proved that murex dye could in fact produce a sky-blue color by exposing the snail secretions to ultraviolet rays during the dyeing process. Sky-blue tzitzit, then, could be made with murex dye.}}</ref> a chemist from the Shenkar College of Fibers in Israel, discovered that if a solution of the dye was exposed to sunlight, blue instead of purple was consistently produced.<ref>O. Elsner, "Solution of the enigmas of dyeing with Tyrian purple and the Biblical tekhelet", ''Dyes in history and Archaeology'' '''10''' (1992) p 14f.</ref> In 1988, Rabbi Eliyahu Tavger dyed ''tekhelet'' from ''M. trunculus'' for the ''mitzvah'' (commandment) of ''tzitzit'' for the first time in recent history.<ref>{{cite web|last=Navon|first=Mois|title=Threads of Reason-A Collection of Essays on Tekhelet|url=http://www.divreinavon.com/pdf/HistoryMesorahNignaz.pdf|accessdate=20 January 2014|author=|page=23|date=December 30, 213|year=2013|quote=In 1985, while writing a book about tzitzit entitled Kelil Tekhelet, R. Eliyahu Tavger became convinced that the source of authentic tekhelet had been found. Determined to actualize his newfound knowledge, and after much trial and error, he succeeded in applying the process, according to halakhah, from beginning to end. He thus became the first person, since the loss of the hillazon, to dye tekhelet for the purpose of tzitzit. In 1991, together with R. Tavger, Ptil Tekhelet was formed to produce and distribute tekhelet strings for tzitzit.}}</ref> Based on his work, four years later, the Ptil Tekhelet Organization was founded to educate about the dye production process and to make the dye available for all who desire to use it. The television show ] interviews an Israeli scientist who also makes the claim that this mollusk is the correct animal. A demonstration of the production of the blue dye using ultraviolet sunlight to produce the blue color is shown. |
In his doctoral thesis (London, 1913) on the subject, Rabbi Herzog named ''Murex trunculus'' as the most likely candidate for the dye's source. Though ''M. trunculus'' fulfilled many of the Talmudic criteria, Rabbi Herzog's inability to consistently obtain blue dye (sometimes the dye was purple) from the snail precluded him from declaring it to be the dye source. In the 1980s, Otto Elsner,<ref>{{cite web|title=What Color Was Tekhelet?|url=http://www.biblicalarchaeology.org/daily/ancient-cultures/what-color-was-tekhelet/|accessdate=20 January 2014|author=Robin Ngo|date=9/11/2013|month=September|year=2013|quote=Decades after Herzog’s death, chemist Otto Elsner proved that murex dye could in fact produce a sky-blue color by exposing the snail secretions to ultraviolet rays during the dyeing process. Sky-blue tzitzit, then, could be made with murex dye.}}</ref> a chemist from the Shenkar College of Fibers in Israel, discovered that if a solution of the dye was exposed to sunlight, blue instead of purple was consistently produced.<ref>O. Elsner, "Solution of the enigmas of dyeing with Tyrian purple and the Biblical tekhelet", ''Dyes in history and Archaeology'' '''10''' (1992) p 14f.</ref> In 1988, Rabbi Eliyahu Tavger dyed ''tekhelet'' from ''M. trunculus'' for the ''mitzvah'' (commandment) of ''tzitzit'' for the first time in recent history.<ref>{{cite web|last=Navon|first=Mois|title=Threads of Reason-A Collection of Essays on Tekhelet|url=http://www.divreinavon.com/pdf/HistoryMesorahNignaz.pdf|accessdate=20 January 2014|author=|page=23|date=December 30, 213|year=2013|quote=In 1985, while writing a book about tzitzit entitled Kelil Tekhelet, R. Eliyahu Tavger became convinced that the source of authentic tekhelet had been found. Determined to actualize his newfound knowledge, and after much trial and error, he succeeded in applying the process, according to halakhah, from beginning to end. He thus became the first person, since the loss of the hillazon, to dye tekhelet for the purpose of tzitzit. In 1991, together with R. Tavger, Ptil Tekhelet was formed to produce and distribute tekhelet strings for tzitzit.}}</ref> Based on his work, four years later, the Ptil Tekhelet Organization was founded to educate about the dye production process and to make the dye available for all who desire to use it. The television show ] interviews an Israeli scientist who also makes the claim that this mollusk is the correct animal. A demonstration of the production of the blue dye using ultraviolet sunlight to produce the blue color is shown. The Documentary Guy Channel posted the episode www.youtube.com/watch?v=KWMXUW0z9Aw in early July 2014. As at 11:50 Wed. 9th July 2014 the video had 6 views. There was one comment from Adam Neira - Founder of World Peace 2050, which gave a detailed refutation of the claims made in the video. By mid August the channel which had reached 60 subscribers by then was unexpectedly closed. In early Jan. 2014 Adam Neira sent a request to Simcha Jacobovici asking him for details of how to purchase a copy of the relevant episode as it was not online at that time. | ||
| But of course there is no unanimous decision/ruling by all the leading Jewish sages that the claims of the Ptil Tekhelet organisation are true. No real, binding "Psak" has been given at any time over the last twenty plus years since the organisation's claims have surfaced. | But of course there is no unanimous decision/ruling by all the leading Jewish sages that the claims of the Ptil Tekhelet organisation are true. No real, binding "Psak" has been given at any time over the last twenty plus years since the organisation's claims have surfaced. | ||
Revision as of 13:01, 8 September 2014
Tekhelet' (Template:Lang-he, "turquoise" or "blue"; alternate spellings include tekelet, t'chelet, techelet and techeiles) is a blue dye mentioned 49 times in the Hebrew Bible/Tanakh. It was used in the clothing of the High Priest, the tapestries in the Tabernacle, and the tassels (Hebrew: ציצית, tzitzit [tsiˈtsit], pl. tzitziot) affixed to the corners of one's four-cornered garment, such as the tallit (garment worn during prayer).
According to the Talmud, the dye of tekhelet was produced from a marine creature known as the ḥillazon (also spelled chilazon). And according to the Tosefta (Men. 9:6), the hillazon is the exclusive source of the dye. But the Tosefta is of course a derivative text written more than 120 years after the destruction of the Second Temple.
After the destruction of the Temple in Jerusalem by the Romans, the sole use of the tekhelet (blue) dye was in tzitzit. A tzitzit is made of four strands, a number of which be tekhelet. There are three opinions as to how many are to be blue: 2 strings; 1 string; 1 half string. There is a more than 80% possibility that the correct configuration is one blue string doubled over making two threads and three white strings making six threads. These strands are then threaded and hang down, appearing to be eight. The four strands are passed through a hole 25 to 50 mm away from the corners of the four-cornered cloth.
Tekhelet is mentioned in the third paragraph of the daily prayers known as the Sh'ma Yisrael (Hebrew: שְׁמַע יִשְׂרָאֵל; "Hear, Israel"), citing Bamidbar - Parshas Shelach (Book of Numbers 15:37-41).
37. The Lord spoke to Moses, saying: 38. Speak to the children of Israel and you shall say to them that they shall make for themselves fringes on the corners of their garments, throughout their generations, and they shall affix a thread of sky blue on the fringe of each corner. 39. This shall be fringes for you, and when you see it, you will remember all the commandments of the Lord to perform them, and you shall not wander after your hearts and after your eyes after which you are going astray. 40. So that you shall remember and perform all My commandments and you shall be holy to your God. 41. I am the Lord, your God, Who took you out of the land of Egypt to be your God; I am the Lord, your God.
— Bamidbar - Parshas Shelach, Numbers 15:37–41
Chronology
Tekhelet was first discovered/invented at the time of the Exodus. Moses and the Hebrews camped on the coast of South Sinai sometime between the years 1440 and 1260. There was five places that Moses addressed/warned the people. The exact date that they were in that part of the Sinai Peninsula is accepted by most historians of any note to be between those one hundred and eighty years. They were there at least three hundred years before the First Temple was inaugurated in Jerusalem in 960 bce. The finding of the hillazon and manufacture of the turquoise dye precedes the manufacture of the covering the Ark of the Covenant, the curtains for the Sanctuary and the making of the priestly robes.
Septuagint translation
In the Septuagint, tekhelet was translated into Greek as hyakinthinos (ὑακίνθινος, "blue").
Biblical references
Of the 49 (or 48 ) uses in the Masoretic Text, one refers to the whole nation of Israel (Numbers 15:37–41), 44 refer to the priesthood or temple. The remaining 6 in Esther, Jeremiah and Ezekiel are secular uses; such as when Mordechai puts on "blue and white" "royal clothing" in Esther. The colour could be used in combination with other colours such as 2 Chronicles 3:14Template:Bibleverse with invalid book where the veil of Solomon's Temple is made of blue (tekhelet), purple (Hebrew: אַרְגָּמָן argaman) and crimson (Hebrew: כַּרְמִיל karmiyl). Ezekiel 27:7 may indicate the source of the shellfish to have been the Aegean region But of course Ezekial lived at least six hundred years after Moses. It also 100% fact that Moses and the Hebrews during the time of the Exodus went nowhere near the Aegean Sea as they were in South Sinai. So the claim that Moses and the Hebrews could have discovered the hilazon in the Aegean is just not possible.
Talmudic references
The Talmud teaches that the source for the blue dye is a marine creature known as the ḥillazon (Hebrew: חילזון, translated as "snail" in Modern Hebrew). The Talmud also mentions a counterfeit dye from a plant called kela ilan, identified as Indigofera tinctoria, the ubiquitous source of blue dye in the ancient world. The Talmud explains that it is forbidden to use this counterfeit dye intentionally, however, if one was duped, the strings are still kosher (i.e., one still fulfills the religious requirement for tzitzit), but they do not fulfill the requirement for tekhelet strings. The Tosefta explains that kela ilan is not the only invalid dye source. In fact, anything but the ḥillazon is unacceptable for making the blue dye. But the Tosefta is of course a derivative text and was written 120 years after the destruction of the Second Temple. The knowhow for the tekhelet was also a closely held secret. The High Priest's family were probably the holders of the knowhow from the time of Aaron. Even King Solomon did not know how the dye was made. He calls the dyers "Cunning". (See "Greek Fire" for how people of the ancient world sought to protect intellectual property.)
In the Talmud, Tractate Menachot 44a, the ḥillazon is described as follows:
- Its body is similar to the sea.
- Its form is like a fish.
- It comes up once in 70 years,
- With its "blood" one dyes tekhelet,
- Therefore: It is expensive.
Other criteria (with Talmudic references):
- The fishers of the ḥillazon are from Haifa to the ladder of Tyre (Shabbat 26a)
- The color of the ḥillazon dye is identical to that produced from the dye of the kela ilan plant (Indigofera tinctoria, a source of the indigo dye), which served as a counterfeit source of the dye (Baba Metzia 61b)
- Cracking open the shell of the ḥillazon on Shabbat violates the laws of Shabbat (Shabbat 75a)
- The shell of the ḥillazon grows together with it (Midrash, Song of Songs Rabbah 4:11)
- It is an invertebrate (Jerusalem Talmud, Shabbat 1:38a)
History
At some point following the Roman exile of the Jews from the Land of Israel, the actual identity of the source of the dye was lost. Since that time, a period spanning over 1,300 years, Jews have only worn plain white tassles (tzitzit). The stripes on prayer shawls, often black, but also blue or purple, are believed to symbolize the lost tekhelet which is referred to by various sources as being "black as midnight", "blue as the midday sky", and even purple. These stripes of tekhelet inspired the design of the flag of Israel. Over the last two centuries, attempts have been made to identify the ancient source of the dye by comparing Talmudic sources to physical evidence. Since then, tzitzit with blue thread has made a comeback, and many people wear such tallitot. However, manyposkim (deciders of Jewish law) remain silent on the re-identification of the ḥillazon and so many observant Jews still continue to wear only white tzitziyot. Rabbi Sholom Dovber Schneersohn maintained that according to the teachings of Kabbalah, the ḥillazon will not reemerge until the coming of the Messiah. The Chazon Ish and many other great Jewish sages of the past also shared this conviction. R. Ariel, of the Temple Institute, suggests that no commandment in the Torah is dependent on the coming of the Messiah, but rather it is incumbent upon every Jew to do his utmost to fulfil the Torah's commandments. But of course the whole issue with tekhelet is that the source of the dye, i.e. the identity of the hillazon is of crucial importance. Without the authentic hillazon being re-discovered, checked and confirmed by all leading Rabbis, a modern day Sanhedrin chosen by someone who can prove hashgaha pratit/prophecy could do the trick, the mitzvot cannot be carried out. This is why the vast majority, perhaps over 95% of all Jewish scholars of today reject the claims of Ptil Tekhelet. The Temple Institute is implicated in the deception. In one of their displays they claim that the High Priest's garment they show, has been dyed using the blue from Ptil Tekhelet. Thus the fraud is exacerbated. No amount of carefully crafted public relation releases and placement in various media or paid, mercenary "professional" Misplaced Pages editors will change the fact that the claims of Ptil Tekhelet are completely suspect. Ersatz copies of divine precepts, like the recently opened "Solomon's Temple" in Sao Paolo, Brazil cheapen the divine source of the commandments. (By all means sell something as a replica or copy but don't call it an original. Spumante is not Champagne. A $20 watch bought at a street stall in Bangkok is obviously not a Rolex. Climbing the various wonders at the Window of the World Funpark in Shenzhen, China is not the same as being in Paris, New York City or Cairo and seeing the originals etc. etc.) There is also the issue of purity. Without purity of intent and practice a mitzvot loses all its spiritual value. Take note all...Many people and groups have used and abused the mitzvot in the Tanach for their own political and monetary gain over the years. Moses would turn in his grave at what has been done in his name the last 3200 years or so.
Identifying the source of the dye
Various shellfish have been suggested for the source of the dye.
According to Zvi Koren, a professor of chemistry, tekhelet was close in color to midnight blue. This conclusion was reached based on the chemical analysis of a 2000-year old patch of dyed fabric recovered from Masada in the 1960s. The sample, shown to have been dyed with Murex snail extraction, is a midnight blue with a purplish hue. On the other hand, in 2013, Na'ama Sukenik of the Israel Antiquities Authority verified a 1st century CE-dated fragment of blue-dyed fabric to have used M. trunculus as the source of its pure blue color.
Excavations at Tel Dor in 1986 unearthed an intact ancient dye manufacturing installation based on dye extracted from murex marine snails.
Identifying the ḥillazon
Three types of mollusks have been proposed as the lost ḥillazon. None have been universally accepted.
Sepia officinalis
In 1887, Grand Rabbi Gershon Henoch Leiner, the Radziner Rebbe, researched the subject and concluded that the Sepia officinalis (common cuttlefish) met many of the criteria. Within a year, Radziner chassidim began wearing tzitzit dyed with a colorant produced from this cephalopod. Some Breslov Hasidim also adopted this custom due to Rebbi Nachman of Breslov's pronouncement on the great importance of wearing tekhelet and in emulation of Rabbi Avraham ben Nachram of Tulchyn, a prominent Breslov teacher who accepted the view of his contemporary, the Radziner Rebbe.
Rabbi Yitzhak HaLevi Herzog (1889–1959) obtained a sample of this dye and had it chemically analyzed. The chemists concluded that it was a well-known synthetic dye "Prussian blue" made by reacting iron sulfate with an organic material. In this case, the cuttlefish only supplied the organic material which could have as easily been supplied from a vast array of organic sources (e.g., ox blood). R. Herzog thus rejected the cuttlefish as the ḥillazon and some suggest that had the Grand Rabbi Gershon Henoch Leiner known this fact, he too would have rejected it based on his explicit criterion that the blue color must come from the animal and that all other additives are permitted solely to aid the color in adhering to the wool.
Janthina
Within his doctoral research on the subject of tekhelet, Herzog placed great hopes on demonstrating that the Murex trunculus was the genuine snail ḥillazon. However, having failed to consistently achieve blue dye from the Murex trunculus, he wrote: “If for the present all hope is to be abandoned of rediscovering the ḥillazon shel tekhelet in some species of the genera Murex and Purpura we could do worse than suggest the Janthina as a not improbable identification”. Although blue dye has indeed been obtained from the Murex trunculus snail, in 2002 Dr. S. W. Kaplan of Rehovot, Israel, sought to investigate Herzog's suggestion that tekhelet came from the extract of Janthina. After fifteen years of research he concluded that the Janthina was not the ancient source of the blue dye.
Murex trunculus
In his doctoral thesis (London, 1913) on the subject, Rabbi Herzog named Murex trunculus as the most likely candidate for the dye's source. Though M. trunculus fulfilled many of the Talmudic criteria, Rabbi Herzog's inability to consistently obtain blue dye (sometimes the dye was purple) from the snail precluded him from declaring it to be the dye source. In the 1980s, Otto Elsner, a chemist from the Shenkar College of Fibers in Israel, discovered that if a solution of the dye was exposed to sunlight, blue instead of purple was consistently produced. In 1988, Rabbi Eliyahu Tavger dyed tekhelet from M. trunculus for the mitzvah (commandment) of tzitzit for the first time in recent history. Based on his work, four years later, the Ptil Tekhelet Organization was founded to educate about the dye production process and to make the dye available for all who desire to use it. The television show The Naked Archaeologist interviews an Israeli scientist who also makes the claim that this mollusk is the correct animal. A demonstration of the production of the blue dye using ultraviolet sunlight to produce the blue color is shown. The Documentary Guy Channel posted the episode www.youtube.com/watch?v=KWMXUW0z9Aw in early July 2014. As at 11:50 Wed. 9th July 2014 the video had 6 views. There was one comment from Adam Neira - Founder of World Peace 2050, which gave a detailed refutation of the claims made in the video. By mid August the channel which had reached 60 subscribers by then was unexpectedly closed. In early Jan. 2014 Adam Neira sent a request to Simcha Jacobovici asking him for details of how to purchase a copy of the relevant episode as it was not online at that time.
But of course there is no unanimous decision/ruling by all the leading Jewish sages that the claims of the Ptil Tekhelet organisation are true. No real, binding "Psak" has been given at any time over the last twenty plus years since the organisation's claims have surfaced.
Other applications
The Australian Flinders University Biological scientists Dr Kirsten Benkendorff and Dr Catherine Abbott, investigating the anti-cancer potential of the local species of sea snail Dicathais orbita or Australian dogwhelks found the bioactive compounds involved in the production of a purple dye which have many possible medicinal uses, including a novel anti-cancer agent that proved effective in curing breast cancer. They announced in October 2008 that the research into Murex purpurea will also be conducted which has an active ingredient sourced from the same family of mollusc as the Australian Dogwhelk.
See also
References
- Compilation (2006). Chumash : the five books of Moses : with Rashi's commentary Targum Onkelos and Haftaros with a commentary anthologized from classic Rabbinic texts and the works of the Lubavitcher Rebge (Synagogue ed.). New York, N.Y.: Kol Menachem. p. 967. ISBN 9781934152010.
{{cite book}}: Unknown parameter|coauthors=ignored (|author=suggested) (help) - ^ "Techelet (Blue Thread)". Tzitzit and Tallis. Chabad Media Center. Retrieved 9 April 2013.
- ^ Zohar, Gil. 50561 "Fringe Benefits - Kfar Adumim factory revives the lost commandment of tekhelet". www.ou.org. Retrieved 14 March 2013.
{{cite web}}: Check|url=value (help) - ^ Amir, Nina. "Lost thread of blue, tekhelet color reestablished". Religion & Spirituality. Clarity Digital Group LLC d/b/a Examiner.com.
{{cite web}}:|access-date=requires|url=(help); Missing or empty|url=(help) - Rashi, Tosafos, Rosh
- Raavad
- Rambam
- "Tekhelet" in Hebrew
- Tekeleth - Strong's Hebrew# 8504
- Gesenius Hebrew lexicon entry for "Isles of Elisha" - more modern source needed
- False Tekhelet http://www.divreinavon.com/pdf/FalseTekhelet.pdf
- The Hillazon Braita http://www.divreinavon.com/pdf/HillazonBraita.pdf
- Threads of Reason http://www.divreinavon.com/pdf/ThreadsOfReason.pdf
- On History, Mesorah and Nignaz http://www.divreinavon.com/pdf/HistoryMesorahNignaz.pdf
- Simmons, Rabbi Shraga. Tallit stripes
- The Mystery of Tekhelet http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8aAJgB4xAIw
- The International Standard Bible Encyclopedia - Page 1057 Geoffrey W. Bromiley - 2007 "The most highly prized dye in the ancient world obtained from the secretions of four molluscs native to the eastern Mediterranean: helix ianthina, murex brandaris, murex trunculus, and purpura lapillus. Various shades could be produced"
- The color techelet
- Kraft, Dina (2011-02-27). "Rediscovered, Ancient Color is Reclaiming Israeli Interest". New York Times.
- "Why so blue? Biblical dye was made from snails". www.nbcnews.com. Associated Press. Dec 31, 2013. Retrieved December 31, 2013.
- Wisdom as a woman of substance: a socioeconomic reading of Proverbs 1–9, Christine Elizabeth Yoder
- P'til T'khelet, p.168
- Herzog, p.71
- Robin Ngo (9/11/2013). "What Color Was Tekhelet?". Retrieved 20 January 2014.
Decades after Herzog's death, chemist Otto Elsner proved that murex dye could in fact produce a sky-blue color by exposing the snail secretions to ultraviolet rays during the dyeing process. Sky-blue tzitzit, then, could be made with murex dye.
{{cite web}}: Check date values in:|date=(help); Unknown parameter|month=ignored (help)CS1 maint: date and year (link) - O. Elsner, "Solution of the enigmas of dyeing with Tyrian purple and the Biblical tekhelet", Dyes in history and Archaeology 10 (1992) p 14f.
- Navon, Mois (December 30, 213). "Threads of Reason-A Collection of Essays on Tekhelet" (PDF). p. 23. Retrieved 20 January 2014.
In 1985, while writing a book about tzitzit entitled Kelil Tekhelet, R. Eliyahu Tavger became convinced that the source of authentic tekhelet had been found. Determined to actualize his newfound knowledge, and after much trial and error, he succeeded in applying the process, according to halakhah, from beginning to end. He thus became the first person, since the loss of the hillazon, to dye tekhelet for the purpose of tzitzit. In 1991, together with R. Tavger, Ptil Tekhelet was formed to produce and distribute tekhelet strings for tzitzit.
{{cite web}}: Check date values in:|year=/|date=mismatch (help) - Volunteer Service supports fresh ideas http://www.flinders.sa.gov.au/fmcfoundation/files/links/InvestigatorAutumn08.pdf
External links
- http://www.tekhelet.com
- http://www.techeiles.org
- http://www.tekhelet.info
- http://www.tekheletfoundation.com
- http://www.tchelet-net.022.co.il
- http://www.techelet.info
- http://www.nytimes.com/2011/02/28/world/middleeast/28blue.html