| Revision as of 00:09, 7 July 2006 edit85.70.5.66 (talk) →Jonathunder← Previous edit | Revision as of 00:13, 7 July 2006 edit undo85.70.5.66 (talk)No edit summaryNext edit → | ||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| blanked, makes no sense to argue. bye | |||
| '''Welcome!''' | |||
| Hello, {{PAGENAME}}, and ] to Misplaced Pages! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers: | |||
| *] | |||
| *] | |||
| *] | |||
| *] | |||
| *] | |||
| *] | |||
| I hope you enjoy editing here and being a ]! Please ] on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out ], ask me on my talk page, or place <code>{{helpme}}</code> on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! | |||
| Just to re-iterate it is important that ou sign any of your message on talkpages with <nowiki>~~~~</nowiki> You can't expect people to take you serious if you don't. ] 12:38, 9 April 2006 (UTC) | |||
| {{unblock}} | |||
| ] | |||
| Is closing an ongoing survey on ] repeatedly, even if editors are still voting. He has closed it first time on 21.13 today, then again on 23.31 , in these 2 hours, three votes were added. The user is disrupting the voting process, supposedly because he wants the result of the vote to stay as it is now. Thanks for any help. | |||
| Now he blocked me from editing wikipedia without giving me any reason. | |||
| ] 23:46, 6 July 2006 (UTC) | |||
| == Jonathunder == | |||
| I see your point now, I can however see no reason for the block. Stop closing the vote as it is actually still running, and even if the guideline says something, you can ignore it if you see it makes sense for wikipedia (i.e. I contacted the experts, linguists and they started voting). Moreover, the guideline is not a policy and you are disrupting the vote by unallowing people to participate in it, even if they would (4 new votes in last 3 hours - where is the sense in closing an ongoing vote?). You being an admin doesn't make me obey you if I believe you are disrupting the process of creating a consensus. I wanted to post you on the AN/I, but your block came across. ] 23:53, 6 July 2006 (UTC) | |||
| :Don't use {{tl|helpme}} for blocks. Just wear the block, it's only 1 hour. And please get an account (after the block expires, or the autoblocker will intervene).--] 23:56, 6 July 2006 (UTC) | |||
| :Oh ya, I'm never coming back. I just wanted to return to check the caron thing, but really, this is nauseating. ] 23:59, 6 July 2006 (UTC) | |||
| {{helpme}} | |||
| :: Commander Keane, I am really sorry, but I don't want to wear any block (and according to WP policies, I shouldn't have to and you should help me) that was given for nonsense reason. Would you like to pay a fine anytime some policeman decides you just ''have to'' without any reason. Quote from ]: | |||
| A straw poll is just a tool for quickly probing opinions. Straw polls should not have opening and closing times as votes do. Instead, just give everybody a chance to chip in with a simple yes or no. Straw polls may trigger discussions instead—that's not a failure, it just means you know that the issue is not clear-cut, which is what you set out to determine in the first place. | |||
| :: The people are still voting, 4 votes in last 3 hours, and that one blocks me because he decided that it should be strictly one weak only. Theres not a word in the guideline about duration and the people are still voting, he is the one who is disrupting it. Someone stop him, I don't want to wear the block that was given for such a reason plus I don't want the vote to be disrupted. ] 00:09, 7 July 2006 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 00:13, 7 July 2006
blanked, makes no sense to argue. bye