Misplaced Pages

:Copyright problems/2014 September 3: Difference between revisions - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< Misplaced Pages:Copyright problems Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 03:05, 10 September 2014 editLindashiers (talk | contribs)179 edits →3 September 2014← Previous edit Revision as of 08:05, 10 September 2014 edit undoLindashiers (talk | contribs)179 edits →Copyright investigations (manual article tagging)Next edit →
Line 20: Line 20:


:::::OK, will fix the bloody section. ] (]) 03:05, 10 September 2014 (UTC) :::::OK, will fix the bloody section. ] (]) 03:05, 10 September 2014 (UTC)

:::::::OK, so '''you''' fix it, as its very clear that plagiarist POV hacks, lacking ], don't allow experts to edit Misplaced Pages. ] (]) 08:05, 10 September 2014 (UTC)


* {{anchor|:The Princess and the Tin Box}}] <span class="plainlinks">( · · ])</span> from http://books.google.com/books?id=4ODhaKpSg7YC&printsec=frontcover&dq=isbn:1582970254&hl=en&sa=X&ei=J38HVKOjCNOWgwSjq4GwBw&ved=0CB8Q6AEwAA#v=onepage&q&f=false. ] (]) 20:59, 3 September 2014 (UTC) * {{anchor|:The Princess and the Tin Box}}] <span class="plainlinks">( · · ])</span> from http://books.google.com/books?id=4ODhaKpSg7YC&printsec=frontcover&dq=isbn:1582970254&hl=en&sa=X&ei=J38HVKOjCNOWgwSjq4GwBw&ved=0CB8Q6AEwAA#v=onepage&q&f=false. ] (]) 20:59, 3 September 2014 (UTC)

Revision as of 08:05, 10 September 2014

3 September 2014

Suspected copyright violations (bot reports)

SCV for 2014-09-03 Edit

2014-09-03 (Suspected copyright violations)
User_talk:Sargdub#Attribution_requested--S Philbrick(Talk) 17:16, 15 September 2014 (UTC)
User_talk:Sargdub#Attribution_requested--S Philbrick(Talk) 17:16, 15 September 2014 (UTC)
Lists can be challenging, but I agree with your assessment.--S Philbrick(Talk) 15:57, 21 September 2014 (UTC)
Left a note at User_talk:Melopeeks#Draft:Daikin_Europe--S Philbrick(Talk) 16:03, 21 September 2014 (UTC)
I delete drafts all the time for spam and/or copyvio reasons. This is no exception. MER-C 13:09, 30 September 2014 (UTC)
Copyright investigations (manual article tagging)
  • I've never idea if this is a newbie mistake or yet another instance of the long-running disruption by supporters of the India Against Corruption pressure group who have been hauled before WP:ANI and other venues on numerous occasions. In any event, there is absolutely no copyright violation in the tagged section and I'd be surprised if there is any in the article at all (mainly, I must admit, because it was mostly rewritten by me ages ago). - Sitush (talk) 09:56, 3 September 2014 (UTC)
  • If you have "mostly written this article" with "absolutely no copyright violation in the tagged section", you must either be Veeresh Malik or Meera Nanda. I came across this blatant copyright violation / plagiarism while researching a paper on Anna Hazare. You can use this free tool or other superior tools. These are the results :
47 matching words were found:
Item 1 : 116 words total, 41% matched "On 29 October 2010 Sri Sri Ravishankar suggested we approach Ramdevji, the populist yogi having millions of followers among the middle classes of small-town India, to be the figurehead for our campaign. But by late Feb 2011 P soon realised Ramdevji's connections to the RSS threatened to damage IAC's credibility as IAC was still an apolitical movement. P demanded we replace him with Anna Hazare, who also brought his large support base along with him, mostly comprising middle-class people from both rural and urban areas and IAC now attracted idealistic internet savvy youths and high-profile support for the campaign from Bollywood stars, and mainstream English-language news media through Madhu's PR contacts."
Item 2 : 133 words total, 35% matched "They approached Ramdev, a populist yogi with millions of supporters among the middle-classes of small-town India, to be the figurehead for this campaign. His connections to the right-wing Sangh Parivar threatened to damage the credibility of what was nominally an apolitical movement. He was soon replaced by Anna Hazare, a veteran social reformer with a history of undertaking fasts in support of his causes. Hazare, too, brought a large support base with him, comprising mostly middle-class people from urban areas and idealistic youths. The urban sophistication of Hazare, compared to Ramdev's rusticity, attracted high-profile support for the campaign from Bollywood stars, the internet-savvy, and mainstream English-language news media. He, too, struggled to disassociate himself from Hindutva symbolism: hence, support from non-Hindus was less forthcoming."
Identical phrases "among the middle classes of small-town India, to be the figurehead for", "connections to the", "threatened to damage", "an apolitical movement.", "large support base", "middle-class people from", "urban areas and", "high-profile support for the campaign from Bollywood stars,", "and mainstream English-language news media". Lindashiers (talk) 07:55, 4 September 2014 (UTC)
Yes, I saw that when the tool ran. I've no idea when it was added but it was not added by me. You could have just fixed the bloody thing instead of creating all this drama. - Sitush (talk) 19:46, 9 September 2014 (UTC)
OK, will fix the bloody section. Lindashiers (talk) 03:05, 10 September 2014 (UTC)
OK, so you fix it, as its very clear that plagiarist POV hacks, lacking WP:CIR, don't allow experts to edit Misplaced Pages. Lindashiers (talk) 08:05, 10 September 2014 (UTC)