| Revision as of 13:40, 11 September 2014 editNeilN (talk | contribs)134,455 edits →GamerGate: new section← Previous edit | Revision as of 14:02, 11 September 2014 edit undo70.24.5.250 (talk) →GamerGateNext edit → | ||
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
| ] applies '''everywhere'''. If you're going to make statements like you need to provide reliable sources that report those statements. --] <sup>]</sup> 13:40, 11 September 2014 (UTC) | ] applies '''everywhere'''. If you're going to make statements like you need to provide reliable sources that report those statements. --] <sup>]</sup> 13:40, 11 September 2014 (UTC) | ||
| To be clear: | |||
| "the SJWs claiming that it was pure misogyny because it disclosed that she cheated on him" - is fine; | |||
| "there's no marriage involved here" - is fine; | |||
| but I have to cite that they were in a monogamous relationship? | |||
| Or is the claim that we're allowed to say that Zoe's ex made certain allegations (since an RS mentioned them), but can't actually say what those allegations were? Everything in my comment was clear about the allegations being allegations and not presenting anything as factual that can't be demonstrated. | |||
Revision as of 14:02, 11 September 2014
Your recent edits
Hello and welcome to Misplaced Pages. When you add content to talk pages and Misplaced Pages pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:
- Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
- With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button (
or 
) located above the edit window.
This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.
Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 09:11, 11 September 2014 (UTC)
GamerGate
WP:BLP applies everywhere. If you're going to make statements like these you need to provide reliable sources that report those statements. --NeilN 13:40, 11 September 2014 (UTC)
To be clear:
"the SJWs claiming that it was pure misogyny because it disclosed that she cheated on him" - is fine;
"there's no marriage involved here" - is fine;
but I have to cite that they were in a monogamous relationship?
Or is the claim that we're allowed to say that Zoe's ex made certain allegations (since an RS mentioned them), but can't actually say what those allegations were? Everything in my comment was clear about the allegations being allegations and not presenting anything as factual that can't be demonstrated.