| Revision as of 19:18, 29 June 2006 editChrisO~enwiki (talk | contribs)43,032 edits Some thoughts on the Monday Club-related articles← Previous edit | Revision as of 09:49, 7 July 2006 edit undoChelsea Tory (talk | contribs)404 editsNo edit summaryNext edit → | ||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
| Chelsea Tory hello! You're more than right. ] 20:51, 28 June 2006 (UTC) | Chelsea Tory hello! You're more than right. ] 20:51, 28 June 2006 (UTC) | ||
| I think your claims that a Marxist/leftist conspiracy is out to nobble the biographies of right-wingers are a bit misplaced. As an experienced Wikipedian and an administrator who's not been involved in any of the Monday Club-related articles before now, I've had a look at them with what I hope you'll accept are unprejudiced eyes. And I have to say that many of the articles are problematic - many of the subjects don't meet Misplaced Pages's biographical notability criteria (]), the articles are stuffed with trivia such as who went to which dinner, they aren't referenced and they're not particularly neutral. Please bear in mind that ]. -- ] 19:18, 29 June 2006 (UTC) | I think your claims that a Marxist/leftist conspiracy is out to nobble the biographies of right-wingers are a bit misplaced. As an experienced Wikipedian and an administrator who's not been involved in any of the Monday Club-related articles before now, I've had a look at them with what I hope you'll accept are unprejudiced eyes. And I have to say that many of the articles are problematic - many of the subjects don't meet Misplaced Pages's biographical notability criteria (]), the articles are stuffed with trivia such as who went to which dinner, they aren't referenced and they're not particularly neutral. Please bear in mind that ]. -- ] 19:18, 29 June 2006 (UTC). | ||
| I have examined some of your comments on umpteen pages and I would say you were not neutral. It appears to me that there are umpteen, often cotnradictory, rules on Misplaced Pages which, at the end of the day, are used to suit almost any occasion. Reading them I would say that in real terms it is almost impossible to do anything right. ] 09:49, 7 July 2006 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 09:49, 7 July 2006
Now that's just absurd. 15:06, 24 June 2006 (UTC).
Chelsea Tory hello! You're more than right. 81.129.155.181 20:51, 28 June 2006 (UTC)
I think your claims that a Marxist/leftist conspiracy is out to nobble the biographies of right-wingers are a bit misplaced. As an experienced Wikipedian and an administrator who's not been involved in any of the Monday Club-related articles before now, I've had a look at them with what I hope you'll accept are unprejudiced eyes. And I have to say that many of the articles are problematic - many of the subjects don't meet Misplaced Pages's biographical notability criteria (WP:BIO), the articles are stuffed with trivia such as who went to which dinner, they aren't referenced and they're not particularly neutral. Please bear in mind that Misplaced Pages is not an indiscriminate collection of information. -- ChrisO 19:18, 29 June 2006 (UTC).
I have examined some of your comments on umpteen pages and I would say you were not neutral. It appears to me that there are umpteen, often cotnradictory, rules on Misplaced Pages which, at the end of the day, are used to suit almost any occasion. Reading them I would say that in real terms it is almost impossible to do anything right. Chelsea Tory 09:49, 7 July 2006 (UTC)