Misplaced Pages

User talk:Jayen466: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 19:06, 13 September 2014 editJayen466 (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Page movers, Mass message senders, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers56,622 edits Respect of my gender: re← Previous edit Revision as of 19:12, 13 September 2014 edit undoTutelary (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers17,196 edits Respect of my gender: Going nowhereNext edit →
Line 102: Line 102:
:::::::: Whether or not it is true, you are associating it with me as if it were true and attempting to use it as evidence. That is still considered outing. I've redacted it as the information has been OS'd before, and repeating it on Misplaced Pages is outing; whether it is true or not. Per {{tq|The fact that a person either has posted personal information or edits under their own name, making them easily identifiable through online searches, is not an excuse for "opposition research". Dredging up their off line opinions to be used to repeatedly challenge their edits can be a form of harassment, just as doing so regarding their past edits on other Misplaced Pages articles may be.}} I will not be harassed. ] (]) 18:59, 13 September 2014 (UTC) :::::::: Whether or not it is true, you are associating it with me as if it were true and attempting to use it as evidence. That is still considered outing. I've redacted it as the information has been OS'd before, and repeating it on Misplaced Pages is outing; whether it is true or not. Per {{tq|The fact that a person either has posted personal information or edits under their own name, making them easily identifiable through online searches, is not an excuse for "opposition research". Dredging up their off line opinions to be used to repeatedly challenge their edits can be a form of harassment, just as doing so regarding their past edits on other Misplaced Pages articles may be.}} I will not be harassed. ] (]) 18:59, 13 September 2014 (UTC)
::::::::: You seem to labour under a misapprehension as to what ] is. I quote: {{xt|Posting another editor's personal information is harassment, unless that person had voluntarily posted his or her own information, or links to such information, on Misplaced Pages. '''Personal information includes legal name, date of birth, identification numbers, home or workplace address, job title and work organisation, telephone number, email address, or other contact information''', whether any such information is accurate or not.}} You yourself saw fit to state, on Misplaced Pages, that you do not have a Reddit account, so I think it is not unfair to ask you about it. Cheers, ] <small><font color=" #FFBF00">]</font>]</small> 19:06, 13 September 2014 (UTC) ::::::::: You seem to labour under a misapprehension as to what ] is. I quote: {{xt|Posting another editor's personal information is harassment, unless that person had voluntarily posted his or her own information, or links to such information, on Misplaced Pages. '''Personal information includes legal name, date of birth, identification numbers, home or workplace address, job title and work organisation, telephone number, email address, or other contact information''', whether any such information is accurate or not.}} You yourself saw fit to state, on Misplaced Pages, that you do not have a Reddit account, so I think it is not unfair to ask you about it. Cheers, ] <small><font color=" #FFBF00">]</font>]</small> 19:06, 13 September 2014 (UTC)
:::::::::: This is obviously going to go nowhere, but as I said, the information has already been OS'd and repeating it on Misplaced Pages is considered outing. ] (]) 19:12, 13 September 2014 (UTC)

Revision as of 19:12, 13 September 2014

Siege of Godesberg The Seduction of Ingmar Bergman Idries Shah Scientology in Germany The Seduction of Ingmar Bergman Afghan Massacre: The Convoy of Death Andreas Grünschloß Anna Murray-Douglass Bolton Brown Bo Ningen Bruce High Quality Foundation Dick Anthony Frank Crichlow Frightful Cave Hilya Īhām INFORM (Information Network Focus on Religious Movements) Ivy Alvarez James A. Beckford John A. Saliba Journal of Contemporary Religion Lorne L. Dawson Magnus Manske Mangrove Restaurant Marimba Ani Maureen Corrigan Peter B. Clarke Race Today Red Barked Tree Remi Kanazi Rosie Vanier Swim ~ The Lazarus Effect (film) The Seduction of Ingmar Bergman The Stool Pigeon (newspaper) PetitPiton.JPG Barnstars


User talk
  • If I have left you a message: please answer on your talk page, as I am watching it.
  • If you leave me a message: I will answer on my talk page, so please add it to your watchlist.
  • Please click here to leave me a new message.


Centralized discussion
Village pumps
policy
tech
proposals
idea lab
WMF
misc
For a listing of ongoing discussions, see the dashboard.



















RfA candidate S O N S% Ending (UTC) Time left Dups? Report
RfB candidate S O N S% Ending (UTC) Time left Dups? Report

No RfXs since 17:37, 25 December 2024 (UTC).—Talk to my owner:Online







Click this button.
Misplaced Pages:WikiProject Unreferenced Biographies of Living Personshttp://toolserver.org/~erwin85/randomarticle.php?lang=en&family=wikipedia&categories=Unreferenced_BLPs&subcats=1&d=2
Reference this BLP.
Arbitration Committee proceedings Case requests

Currently, there are no requests for arbitration.

Open cases
Case name Links Evidence due Prop. Dec. due
Palestine-Israel articles 5 (t) (ev / t) (ws / t) (pd / t) 21 Dec 2024 11 Jan 2025
Recently closed cases (Past cases)

No cases have recently been closed (view all closed cases).

Clarification and Amendment requests

Currently, no requests for clarification or amendment are open.

Arbitrator motions
Motion name Date posted
Arbitrator workflow motions 1 December 2024



Archives

1 · 2 · 3 · 4 · 5 · 6 · 7 · 8 · 9 · 10 · 11 · 12 · 13 · 14 · 15 · 16 · 17 · 18 · 19 · 20 · 21 · 22 · 23 · 24 · 25 · 26 · 27 · 28 · 29 · 30 · 31 · 32 · 33 · 34 · 35 · 36 · 37 · 38 · 39 · 40 · 41 · 42 · 43 · 44 · 45 · 46 · 47 · 48 · 49 · 50 · 51 · 52 · 53 · 54 · 55 · 56 · 57 · 58 · 59 · 60 · 61 · 62 · 63 · 64 · 65 · 66 · 67 · 68 · 69 · 70



This page has archives. Sections older than 10 days may be automatically archived by ClueBot III.

enwiki and dewiki admins

Hi.

This discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it.
The following discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it.
MariaDB > SELECT enwiki_p.user.user_name FROM enwiki_p.user_groups JOIN enwiki_p.user ON enwiki_p.user_groups.ug_user=enwiki_p.user.user_id AND ug_group="sysop" JOIN dewiki_p.user ON enwiki_p.user.user_name=dewiki_p.user.user_name JOIN dewiki_p.user_groups ON dewiki_p.user_groups.ug_user=dewiki_p.user.user_id AND dewiki_p.user_groups.ug_group="sysop";
+---------------+
| user_name     |
+---------------+
| Magnus Manske |
| Pjacobi       |
| Lustiger seth |
| Leyo          |
| DerHexer      |
+---------------+
5 rows in set (0.36 sec)

It may be missing some; my SQL is rusty. πr (tc) 01:30, 3 September 2014 (UTC)

Thanks! Andreas JN466 02:12, 3 September 2014 (UTC)

Namedropping

I mentioned you at User talk:Risker#Question without thinking to ask if you were interested first. That was stupid on my part and I apologize. I would be interested if you would want to develop such material anyway though. John Carter (talk) 16:49, 3 September 2014 (UTC)

That's quite alright, John. Will keep an eye on that discussion. Andreas JN466 18:42, 3 September 2014 (UTC)

The Signpost: 03 September 2014

Another alt name hoax/vandal

Hello, Jayen! I am posting on your talk page out of frustration with WP. Regarding past instances of faux alternate names such as the "Brazilian aardvark" and "Azid" that I first noticed on that badsite, here's another one in the same vein:

Megalopyge opercularis (a.k.a. the puss caterpillar) is in the news recently and some big time news sites are picking up the story for the fear factor I guess. This moth has been listed with an alt name of "pussy moth" since 15 Apr 2007 (over 7 years!) introduced in this edit where 71.80.222.246 changed "puss moth" to "pussy moth". I found two outside websites referencing this: and . (Googling "pussy moth" is kinda dangerous.) So far, no mainstream references yet. I hope this gives you a chuckle, no need to respond with anything other than indifference, I was just documenting this. Rgrds. --64.85.214.228 (talk) 07:22, 8 September 2014 (UTC)

Thanks! Well, it's starting. Expect flocks of pussy moths descending upon us over the coming days. Note and , both published well after that edit. Intriguingly, though, there is another species of moth, Cerura vinula, that has been described as a "pussy moth" in two books published BW (before Misplaced Pages), although "puss moth" is much the more common and standard name in that case as well. At any rate, I cannot find a single book published BW that describes Megalopyge as a "pussy moth". No doubt that will soon change. Best, Andreas JN466 08:15, 8 September 2014 (UTC)

Respect of my gender

Hello, at one of the WP:ANI pages you commented and used male pronouns to describe me or subsequently used a comment like, 'Pretending to be something they're not'. I would like to note that I am a woman and referring to me by male pronouns by mistake, and fixing it later is perfectly fine, however given the context of the situation, I don't approve of it happening when I've made it clear several times that I am a woman. ArbCom especially has already set a precedent on this in the Manning case, where editors should respect other editor's gender identities, gender, backgrounds, and the like. I would like to be respected so I am going to ask that you edit your comment to use female pronouns. Thank you. Tutelary (talk) 15:08, 13 September 2014 (UTC) See below.

Diff? Andreas JN466 17:48, 13 September 2014 (UTC)
Hmm, it was this bit but now that I look at it, I am wrong. 'who complained that that edit reverted an addition he had made.' I read as referring to me making the edit, not the apparent reddit user. Struck original comment; though another concern did come up: You insinuated that if site banned, I would sock. Why did you make that comment?
Yes, I thought you might have misread that. Do you deny you made (highlighted in yellow) on Reddit? I see it has now been . Andreas JN466 18:29, 13 September 2014 (UTC)
That's not what I asked, I asked you why you thought I would sock if I got site banned. Tutelary (talk) 18:39, 13 September 2014 (UTC)
It's what I asked. So – ? Andreas JN466 18:45, 13 September 2014 (UTC)
I will not answer questions where you are apparently outing me. You should redact that comment, btw. Tutelary (talk) 18:47, 13 September 2014 (UTC)
If Ging287 is just some random internet user who is nothing to do with you, then this link is not outing you in any way, shape or form. If it is you, however, then you have lied to the community. I would advise you to stop doing that; there is really no need for it. Andreas JN466 18:52, 13 September 2014 (UTC)
Whether or not it is true, you are associating it with me as if it were true and attempting to use it as evidence. That is still considered outing. I've redacted it as the information has been OS'd before, and repeating it on Misplaced Pages is outing; whether it is true or not. Per The fact that a person either has posted personal information or edits under their own name, making them easily identifiable through online searches, is not an excuse for "opposition research". Dredging up their off line opinions to be used to repeatedly challenge their edits can be a form of harassment, just as doing so regarding their past edits on other Misplaced Pages articles may be. I will not be harassed. Tutelary (talk) 18:59, 13 September 2014 (UTC)
You seem to labour under a misapprehension as to what WP:Outing is. I quote: Posting another editor's personal information is harassment, unless that person had voluntarily posted his or her own information, or links to such information, on Misplaced Pages. Personal information includes legal name, date of birth, identification numbers, home or workplace address, job title and work organisation, telephone number, email address, or other contact information, whether any such information is accurate or not. You yourself saw fit to state, on Misplaced Pages, that you do not have a Reddit account, so I think it is not unfair to ask you about it. Cheers, Andreas JN466 19:06, 13 September 2014 (UTC)
This is obviously going to go nowhere, but as I said, the information has already been OS'd and repeating it on Misplaced Pages is considered outing. Tutelary (talk) 19:12, 13 September 2014 (UTC)