| Revision as of 22:59, 14 September 2014 editMusikAnimal (talk | contribs)Edit filter managers, Autopatrolled, Interface administrators, Administrators120,542 edits →Possible sockpuppetry: fully protected← Previous edit | Revision as of 05:41, 15 September 2014 edit undoBengaliHindu (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Rollbackers6,332 editsNo edit summaryNext edit → | ||
| Line 78: | Line 78: | ||
| I'm not going to flat out accuse you, but just to make sure you know, using multiple accounts in a content dispute is called ] and is strictly prohibited. I only say this because the creation of the account {{u|Nirmalya1234}}, their only two edits, and the timing of those edits, is quite suspicious. — '''] <sup>]</sup>''' 22:56, 14 September 2014 (UTC) | I'm not going to flat out accuse you, but just to make sure you know, using multiple accounts in a content dispute is called ] and is strictly prohibited. I only say this because the creation of the account {{u|Nirmalya1234}}, their only two edits, and the timing of those edits, is quite suspicious. — '''] <sup>]</sup>''' 22:56, 14 September 2014 (UTC) | ||
| :I've fully protected the article for now. I encourage you and the other involved editors to discuss further controversial changes on the ]. Thanks for your understanding — '''] <sup>]</sup>''' 22:59, 14 September 2014 (UTC) | :I've fully protected the article for now. I encourage you and the other involved editors to discuss further controversial changes on the ]. Thanks for your understanding — '''] <sup>]</sup>''' 22:59, 14 September 2014 (UTC) | ||
| ::I stopped editing after reporting {{u|MehulWB}} and his continuous vandalism. We had a brief discussion in my talk page just above the section preceding this section. I have already explained the user whatever I had to explain. You can have a look if you want. ] (]) 05:41, 15 September 2014 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 05:41, 15 September 2014
Hello. It appears that you have been canvassing—leaving messages on a biased choice of users' talk pages to notify them of an ongoing community decision, debate, or vote. While friendly notices are allowed, they should be limited and nonpartisan in distribution and should reflect a neutral point of view. Please do not post notices which are indiscriminately cross-posted, which espouse a certain point of view or side of a debate, or which are selectively sent only to those who are believed to hold the same opinion as you. Remember to respect Misplaced Pages's principle of consensus-building by allowing decisions to reflect the prevailing opinion among the community at large. Naved77 (talk) 09:18, 17 December 2013 (UTC)
Misplaced Pages–Wikimedia MeetupKolkata, India(view · edit · changes)
| This is BengaliHindu's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments. |
|
 Archives |
|
no archives yet (create) |
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 15 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 2 sections are present. |
Hello, BengaliHindu, and welcome to Misplaced Pages! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages you might find helpful:
- Introduction
- The five pillars of Misplaced Pages
- How to edit a page
- How to write a great article
- Manual of Style
- Also feel free to make test edits in the sandbox.
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place "{{helpme}}" on your talk page and someone will drop by to help. ϢereSpielChequers 11:30, 22 September 2009 (UTC)
A page you started has been reviewed!
Thanks for creating Bagber massacre, BengaliHindu!
Misplaced Pages editor Jorgath just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:
This article is a good start, although I rewrote the intro a little and removed the list of people killed (see WP:NOTMEMORIAL). It's got some issues to work on that I haven't touched, too, but it's a start.
To reply, leave a comment on Jorgath's talk page.
Learn more about page curation.
Request for comment
Nomination of Madhyapara massacre for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Madhyapara massacre is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Madhyapara massacre until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
A cup of coffee for you!
|
I hope you have a peaceful retirement and consider staying around a bit.
I am not sure if you heard, but meta:Wikimedia Bangladesh got chapter recognition from the Wikimedia Foundation and I expect that yearly from now on they will apply for funding to develop Bangla Misplaced Pages. I know that you live in India but if you have interest in supporting Bangla, then perhaps you might like to be aware that you have the option to speak up for Bangla Misplaced Pages with that organization. Your organization in India is also an option, but of course deals with so many languages. I wish there could be more of a Misplaced Pages community in Kolkata. Blue Rasberry (talk) 16:18, 21 August 2014 (UTC) |
Merging of two templates
Please participate in discussion at https://en.wikipedia.org/Wikipedia:Templates_for_discussion/Log/2014_August_31#August_31 Please ignore if already notified
Allegations not proven
Sir, In reference to the Ahmed Hassan Imran page, you are posting purely allegation which are not proved yet. Those allegations were published in Anandabazar Patrika without any solid proofs and are being challenged now including the DIG report of the Canning riots. Yesterday the paper published SIO link with Ahmed Hassan Imran but today they published that Ahmed Hassan Imran has no link with SIO. Similarly allegations were made against his birth place on yesterday's publication. These facts are changing day by day and are mere allegations. Those allegations are being backtracked now. Hence in this regard your are requested not to post anything which is not proven in Courts since posting of such unproven libelous news information against an elected Rajya Sabha MP in public domain falls under Cyber crime. If you are not the rightful authority then we would like to request you to forward us to the Misplaced Pages's actual authority. Thank you.10:24, 14 September 2014 (UTC)
- Who are the people you mentioned as "we"? BengaliHindu (talk) 10:27, 14 September 2014 (UTC)
We are the readers of Kalom newspaper. — Preceding unsigned comment added by MehulWB (talk • contribs) 10:35, 14 September 2014 (UTC)
- You should not vandalize Misplaced Pages. All mentioned information were quoted from reliable secondary sources and even mentioned as "according to so and so..." which is legitimate as per Misplaced Pages policies and doesn't fall under any cyber crime. BengaliHindu (talk) 10:58, 14 September 2014 (UTC)
I apologies if I made any mistakes but defamatory news stories about a living person is not reliable unless proven by Indian laws. Ahmed Hassan Imran himself denies the allegations against him (please refer to the Hindu newspaper) so, I request you to wait until further reports come out. — Preceding unsigned comment added by MehulWB (talk • contribs) 11:06, 14 September 2014 (UTC)
- You are mistaken. Misplaced Pages article is not a news story. A Misplaced Pages article can only mention information that have already been published in reliable secondary sources. Was there any sentence (among that you deleted) that was not published in a newspaper? In fact the phrasing was like "according to intelligence reports..". Not a single sentence claimed the information to be correct. They only mentioned that such and such reports mention so and so. This is perfectly OK in Misplaced Pages NPOV terms. Moreover, that fact that Imran himself denied the allegations was also mentioned. There is no Indian law or Misplaced Pages policy which states that an article can't be edited until something is proven in a court of law. On the contrary what you are doing is against Misplaced Pages policies. BengaliHindu (talk) 11:19, 14 September 2014 (UTC)
This doesn't mean you can post/spread libelous information on an open access encyclopedia damaging the reputation of a Rajya Sabha MP even when it is subject to court's verdict. Which source you are referring to as reliable? Anandabazar didn't provide any proofs. They only published the news of allegations made by other politicians. News are being made each hours so unless it is proved as per our existing laws you cannot spread any information which may be harmful to a living person. However, you can do so after the allegations are found to be correct. — Preceding unsigned comment added by MehulWB (talk • contribs) 12:52, 14 September 2014 (UTC)
- (1) You have accused me of libel twice. This is nothing but personal attack. Do not violate Misplaced Pages etiquette. (2) Anandabazar Patrika is a reliable secondary source. When it says that it is quoting from a report of Ministry of External Affairs, you have to accept the fact that Anandabazar has such a report with them. You may or may not agree with the content of the report, but you have no reason to disagree that Anandabazar has such a report. (3) The content of the report may or may not be true. I don't know who who will adjudicate whether the content of the report is true or not. Maybe the court will do it. But unless that is done, there is no law which can stop anyone from mentioning that "According to a report of the Ministry of External Affairs, Imran did this or that" and providing the reference of Anandabazar. Making such statement doesn't require any proof under Indian law or Misplaced Pages policies. Hope this explanation helps. BengaliHindu (talk) 13:07, 14 September 2014 (UTC)
Please, do not get me wrong. I have no intention to accuse you of anything unless you do any such. Anandabazar has a report but Misplaced Pages is not a newspaper that you will post the same report. I am pointing to the unproven allegation you are posting which may damage the reputation of an elected MP. You cannot post based on an unverified report of a newspaper. Its newspaper's duty to report news but Misplaced Pages provides accurate information. So, an encyclopedia cannot make such allegation which my harm a living person even while this case is not resolved. If you are posting the report as Anandabazar did then you have to take its responsibility too. The report is no way reliable to be posted on Misplaced Pages. That is why I requested you to wait until further reports come out. Are you getting my point sir?
September 2014
Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. Amortias (T)(C) 17:58, 14 September 2014 (UTC)
Possible sockpuppetry
I'm not going to flat out accuse you, but just to make sure you know, using multiple accounts in a content dispute is called sockpuppetry and is strictly prohibited. I only say this because the creation of the account Nirmalya1234, their only two edits, and the timing of those edits, is quite suspicious. — MusikAnimal 22:56, 14 September 2014 (UTC)
- I've fully protected the article for now. I encourage you and the other involved editors to discuss further controversial changes on the talk page. Thanks for your understanding — MusikAnimal 22:59, 14 September 2014 (UTC)
- I stopped editing after reporting MehulWB and his continuous vandalism. We had a brief discussion in my talk page just above the section preceding this section. I have already explained the user whatever I had to explain. You can have a look if you want. BengaliHindu (talk) 05:41, 15 September 2014 (UTC)