Revision as of 14:05, 17 September 2014 editWinkelvi (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers30,145 edits →Children in infobox: resp← Previous edit | Revision as of 14:37, 17 September 2014 edit undoHelenOnline (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers21,295 edits →Children in infobox: rNext edit → | ||
Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
One revert is not edit warring. The infobox MOS guidelines are clear about what should and shouldn't be included and why. We want people to read the article, not get trivial facts from the infobox and move on. This is an extremely short article, a stub, really. If someone wants to know the names of her children, the article is sufficient for that. Because the article is so small, those names are easy to find. For more information on what's appropriate in info boxes, see ] and the section located here: . -- <span style="text-shadow: 4px 4px 15px #0099FF, -4px -4px 15px #99FF00;">]</span> ● <span style="text-shadow: 4px 4px 15px #FF9900, -4px -4px 15px #FF0099;">] ]</span> 14:05, 17 September 2014 (UTC) | One revert is not edit warring. The infobox MOS guidelines are clear about what should and shouldn't be included and why. We want people to read the article, not get trivial facts from the infobox and move on. This is an extremely short article, a stub, really. If someone wants to know the names of her children, the article is sufficient for that. Because the article is so small, those names are easy to find. For more information on what's appropriate in info boxes, see ] and the section located here: . -- <span style="text-shadow: 4px 4px 15px #0099FF, -4px -4px 15px #99FF00;">]</span> ● <span style="text-shadow: 4px 4px 15px #FF9900, -4px -4px 15px #FF0099;">] ]</span> 14:05, 17 September 2014 (UTC) | ||
:You reverting my revert without discussion (BRR) is exactly what edit warring is. ]] 14:37, 17 September 2014 (UTC) |
Revision as of 14:37, 17 September 2014
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Marsha Garces Williams article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
This article has not yet been rated on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
|
Article name
I have requested a move to Marsha Garces Williams as reliable sources as recent as 2012 and 2014 indicate she is still using her married name. HelenOnline 06:45, 16 August 2014 (UTC)
Children in infobox
See also: Talk:Robin_Williams § Rfc:_Should_the_name_of_Zelda_Rae_Williams_be_included_in_the_infobox.3FI disagree with Winkelvi's removal of the children's names from the infobox. Their names are in the public domain and Zelda Williams is notable. I restored them, and Winkelvi is now edit warring over it. HelenOnline 13:34, 17 September 2014 (UTC)
One revert is not edit warring. The infobox MOS guidelines are clear about what should and shouldn't be included and why. We want people to read the article, not get trivial facts from the infobox and move on. This is an extremely short article, a stub, really. If someone wants to know the names of her children, the article is sufficient for that. Because the article is so small, those names are easy to find. For more information on what's appropriate in info boxes, see WP:IBX and the section located here: . -- Winkelvi ● ✉ ✓ 14:05, 17 September 2014 (UTC)
- You reverting my revert without discussion (BRR) is exactly what edit warring is. HelenOnline 14:37, 17 September 2014 (UTC)