Misplaced Pages

:Articles for deletion/Christian Lujan: Difference between revisions - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion Browse history interactivelyNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 18:47, 17 September 2014 editDrmies (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Checkusers, Oversighters, Administrators406,277 edits Creating deletion discussion page for Christian Lujan. (TW Revision as of 18:59, 17 September 2014 edit undoIntoThinAir (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, New page reviewers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers114,573 edits Listing at WP:DELSORT under Academics and educators (FWDS)Next edit →
Line 5: Line 5:
:({{Find sources|Christian Lujan}}) :({{Find sources|Christian Lujan}})
Article has been tagged for years. I don't see anything in the bibliography or on Google that suggests notability--the requirements in ] are not met, and I don't think that those in ] are met either. A PROD was removed, which is fine, but the rationale, "is published author", is not enough for notability per our standards. ] (]) 18:47, 17 September 2014 (UTC) Article has been tagged for years. I don't see anything in the bibliography or on Google that suggests notability--the requirements in ] are not met, and I don't think that those in ] are met either. A PROD was removed, which is fine, but the rationale, "is published author", is not enough for notability per our standards. ] (]) 18:47, 17 September 2014 (UTC)
:<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This debate has been included in the ]. ] ] 18:59, 17 September 2014 (UTC)</small>

Revision as of 18:59, 17 September 2014

Christian Lujan

Christian Lujan (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article has been tagged for years. I don't see anything in the bibliography or on Google that suggests notability--the requirements in WP:GNG are not met, and I don't think that those in WP:PROF are met either. A PROD was removed, which is fine, but the rationale, "is published author", is not enough for notability per our standards. Drmies (talk) 18:47, 17 September 2014 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. Jinkinson talk to me 18:59, 17 September 2014 (UTC)
Categories: