| Revision as of 10:00, 21 September 2014 editNorthamerica1000 (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Administrators708,032 editsm Talkback (User talk:Northamerica1000#The final straw...) (TW)← Previous edit | Revision as of 15:34, 21 September 2014 edit undoCarolmooredc (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers31,944 edits WP:No personal attacks - moved to correct pageNext edit → | ||
| Line 90: | Line 90: | ||
| {{talkback|Northamerica1000|The final straw...|ts=10:00, 21 September 2014 (UTC)}} | {{talkback|Northamerica1000|The final straw...|ts=10:00, 21 September 2014 (UTC)}} | ||
| ]<sup>]</sup> 10:00, 21 September 2014 (UTC) | ]<sup>]</sup> 10:00, 21 September 2014 (UTC) | ||
| ==]== | |||
| ] Please do not ] other editors. Comment on ''content'', not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Please ] and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you.<!-- Template:uw-npa2 --> | |||
| You named me twice in a thread where it was ''inferred'' I was one of the individuals who was subject of a threat of violence. You cast WP:ASPERSIONS without any evidence, and in an inappropriate forum. I wish you'd cut it out. Feel free to remove my name. <small>'''] (])'''</small> 15:22, 21 September 2014 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 15:34, 21 September 2014
| This is Stalwart111's talk page, where you can send him messages and comments. |
|
| Archives |
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 14 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 5 sections are present. |
 | other people |
Teri Takai
I dropped the stick but the argument that you made is the exact one I was protesting. Title does not equate to notability. I can name a dozen CIOs both of federal agencies and major corporations that do not have a Misplaced Pages page. Articles like this and the what I think are flimsy arguments to keep raise concerns. In the end wikipedia's own guidelines state that title and position does automatically equal notability. In short, So what! She's the former DOD CIO. Many came before and many will come after. VA's CIO doesn't have a wiki, FBI, Walmart, Bank of America,.....title doesn't equal notability. --0pen$0urce (talk) 23:27, 9 September 2014 (UTC)
- You've completely missed the point. Again. She's notable not because of her title but because she has received significant coverage in multiple reliable sources. That's sufficient for anyone to be considered notable, DOD CIO or Clark County Dog-Catcher. If those other CIOs don't have articles but do pass WP:GNG (like Takai) then the create those articles. But all of that aside, occasionally titles do confer notability - CEO of major corporations, Secretary-General of the UN, President/Congressman/Senator, etc. There are a great many "titles" that confer automatic notability in a range of different special notability guidelines. And all of that aside, Takai held a title we do consider notable in its own right. We don't say the same about the CIOs of the FBI, Walmart or the Bank of America but again, if those people pass WP:GNG then we should have articles about them too. You need to actually read some of those guidelines before trying to claim some sort of expertise and getting it badly wrong. St★lwart 00:10, 10 September 2014 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
|
The Special Barnstar |
| Thanks for the articles and the work on AfD. Always good to see you around. OccultZone (Talk • Contributions • Log) 14:21, 12 September 2014 (UTC) |
- Hey, thanks! Very nice of you O.Z. St★lwart 14:24, 12 September 2014 (UTC)
Thank you
Thank you for taken the step to report me at administrators noticeboard/incident. I didint mean to put you through that stress and I think you were right for your action. I will consider civility my first priority. Accept my unreserved apology. However, this tool has stopped working. Any alternative? Thanks Wikicology (talk) 11:11, 14 September 2014 (UTC)
- Wikicology, your apology is accepted, of course. But as far as I was ever concerned, you broke the rules, you didn't offend me - you just did something silly. You were reverted and that should be the end of that (though I would still advise you don't close any more AFDs until you've had a chance to participate in a few more). Nothing more to apologise for there. You might like to consider apologising to some of those who have raised other concerns at WP:ANI. Your earlier apologies seem to have been happily accepted by others as a sign you are willing to change. I don't know of an alternative to that tool, sorry. St★lwart 23:16, 14 September 2014 (UTC)
- Ok sir. I hope you will help when next i visit your for an advice or assistance? Wikicology (talk) 23:33, 14 September 2014 (UTC)
- Any time, though there are likely others more qualified than me to provide it. St★lwart 23:56, 14 September 2014 (UTC)
- @Wikicology: Have you tried User:Zhaofeng Li/Reflinks? OccultZone (Talk • Contributions • Log) 10:28, 16 September 2014 (UTC)
- Any time, though there are likely others more qualified than me to provide it. St★lwart 23:56, 14 September 2014 (UTC)
- Ok sir. I hope you will help when next i visit your for an advice or assistance? Wikicology (talk) 23:33, 14 September 2014 (UTC)
- Wikicology, your apology is accepted, of course. But as far as I was ever concerned, you broke the rules, you didn't offend me - you just did something silly. You were reverted and that should be the end of that (though I would still advise you don't close any more AFDs until you've had a chance to participate in a few more). Nothing more to apologise for there. You might like to consider apologising to some of those who have raised other concerns at WP:ANI. Your earlier apologies seem to have been happily accepted by others as a sign you are willing to change. I don't know of an alternative to that tool, sorry. St★lwart 23:16, 14 September 2014 (UTC)
Precious again
history, culture and politics
Thank you for quality articles and contributions where history, culture and politics meet, such as Catacomb saints and Antonio Barberini, for caring for deletions, for working towards "hostility will disappear quietly", - you are an awesome Wikipedian!
--Gerda Arendt (talk) 09:07, 18 September 2013 (UTC)
A year ago, you were the 608th recipient of my PumpkinSky Prize, --Gerda Arendt (talk) 09:34, 18 September 2014 (UTC)
- Thanks for the reminder, Gerda Arendt. Glad to see you're still doing this. St★lwart 00:32, 21 September 2014 (UTC)
- It's in memory of two friends I miss, did you know? --Gerda Arendt (talk) 06:48, 21 September 2014 (UTC)
- No, I had no idea. That gives it even more meaning! St★lwart 07:05, 21 September 2014 (UTC)
Talkback
Message added 09:45, 19 September 2014 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
NorthAmerica 09:45, 19 September 2014 (UTC)
Fuelexperts deletion/ doubts about Fuel management systems page
| Misunderstanding about username policy and alternative accounts. |
|---|
|
Hi, I understand that the username "Fuelexperts" was not quite compliant with G11, nevertheless I don't see why the haste about the deletion as there is no public or industry group, association or other community calling themselves Fuelexperts nor Fuel Experts. Anyway, it's history now. VRC Fuelexperts Ltd is involved in throwing a lifeline to thousands of businesses worldwide who are on the brink of bankruptcy because of losses associated with the lack of professional fuel management, who often struggle to understand the reasons behind these losses. for the sake of fairness and also to avoid me committing any more "faux pas" please review the page "Fuel management systems" as I believe the categorization the author introduces in the section "Hardware" is merely a personal opinion, which would be fine if the author gave his/her name as source; the rest of the article is also more confusing than encyclopedic. Have a great day and thank you for the work you do for all of us. VRC Fuelexperts Ltd (talk) 04:46, 20 September 2014 (UTC) BBdR |
Your original name was blocked because it was a violation of our username policy. This one isn't much better and it obviously belongs to the same person so it has been blocked too. The best thing to do would be to go back to your original account and request a new name - your account will be unblocked and you will be allowed to edit freely. Thereafter, I can move your comments about the article to the talk page for discussion. G11 refers to the reason something is deleted - you can't use a user page (have a look at mine - User:Stalwart111 - as an example) for promotion of a company. If you want to start an article about the company you should do that via WP:AFC. Cheers, St★lwart 22:54, 20 September 2014 (UTC)
Talkback
Message added 10:00, 21 September 2014 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
NorthAmerica 10:00, 21 September 2014 (UTC)
WP:No personal attacks
Please do not attack other editors. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you.
You named me twice in a thread where it was inferred I was one of the individuals who was subject of a threat of violence. You cast WP:ASPERSIONS without any evidence, and in an inappropriate forum. I wish you'd cut it out. Feel free to remove my name. Carolmooredc (Talkie-Talkie) 15:22, 21 September 2014 (UTC)