Misplaced Pages

User talk:82.225.228.35: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 11:09, 8 July 2006 editBhadani (talk | contribs)204,742 edits may god bless you and your parents who raised such a brilliant kid like you← Previous edit Revision as of 11:10, 8 July 2006 edit undoBhadani (talk | contribs)204,742 editsm Amazing==: frmtNext edit →
Line 22: Line 22:
I found that you are very much interested in the page ]. You have been wrongly directing this page to ]. I have made a stub. Please try to expand them, I am sure that you shall do that as you have been showing a lot of interest in the topic. Please do not vandalize the contents by your edits. Please also read the talk page of ]. Cheers! --] 15:56, 6 July 2006 (UTC) I found that you are very much interested in the page ]. You have been wrongly directing this page to ]. I have made a stub. Please try to expand them, I am sure that you shall do that as you have been showing a lot of interest in the topic. Please do not vandalize the contents by your edits. Please also read the talk page of ]. Cheers! --] 15:56, 6 July 2006 (UTC)


==Amazing==== ==Amazing==


Re: & Re: &

Revision as of 11:10, 8 July 2006

Your recent edit to India was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Misplaced Pages articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept our apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // Tawkerbot2 15:44, 20 April 2006 (UTC)

edits

Please do not modify other peoples talk page comments, as you did in Talk:Pakistan. If you want to modify some of your own comments that were left as a logged-in user, please sign in and then change comments. Thanks. --Ragib 20:12, 10 May 2006 (UTC)

Warning

You reverted this edit: http://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Talk:Ancient_Pakistan&diff=61899466&oldid=58207959

This is vandalism. In case, you continue to do so, you shall be blocked from editing wikipedia.


You have recently vandalized a Misplaced Pages article, and you are now being asked to stop this type of behavior. You're welcome to continue editing Misplaced Pages, so long as these edits are constructive. Please see Misplaced Pages's Blocking policy and what constitutes vandalism; such actions are not tolerated on Misplaced Pages, and are not taken lightly.

We hope that you will become a legitimate editor and create an account. Again, you are welcome here at Misplaced Pages, but remember not to vandalize or you will soon be blocked from editing.

--Bhadani 16:46, 4 July 2006 (UTC)

Blocked

Blocked
You have been blocked for vandalism for 1 hour. To contest this block, add the text {{unblock}} on this page, along with an explanation of why you believe this block to be unjustified. You can also email the blocking administrator or any administrator from this list. Please be sure to include your username (if you have one) and IP address in your email.

Please do not erase warnings on this page. Doing so is also considered vandalism.

--Bhadani 16:55, 4 July 2006 (UTC)

Your interest

I found that you are very much interested in the page Ancient Pakistan. You have been wrongly directing this page to Pakistan. I have made a stub. Please try to expand them, I am sure that you shall do that as you have been showing a lot of interest in the topic. Please do not vandalize the contents by your edits. Please also read the talk page of Ancient Pakistan. Cheers! --Bhadani 15:56, 6 July 2006 (UTC)

Amazing

Re: &

"Hello Queen, I thank you for reverting the nasty edits from a nice person on my page. Had it been there it would not have made much difference, as some people are prone to give in to anger very soon, particularly when they do not understand that the reason for acting in any particular way. Actually, they are "uneducated" persons and require sympathy. May God Bless them and their parents who raised such brilliant kids!" --Bhadani 11:09, 8 July 2006 (UTC)