Revision as of 11:43, 27 September 2014 view sourceDuffycharles (talk | contribs)69 edits Undid revision 627268956 by DeCausa (talk)Discuss first on talk page.← Previous edit | Revision as of 11:46, 27 September 2014 view source NQ (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers6,648 edits Reverted 1 edit by Duffycharles (talk): Doesn't work that way. See WP:BRD Rationale provided by VocediTenore on the talk page. (tw)Next edit → | ||
Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
| focus = ] | | focus = ] | ||
| dissolved = | | dissolved = | ||
| website = http://www.indiaagainstcorruption.org.in/ | |||
}} | }} | ||
Line 36: | Line 35: | ||
The new Team Anna, sometimes referred to as ''Team Anna 2.0'', was preparing to tour the country from 30 January 2013, coinciding with the death anniversary of ].<ref name="ndtv" >{{cite news |url=http://www.ndtv.com/article/india/team-anna-2-0-announced-will-tour-country-from-january-30-291098 |title=Team Anna 2.0 announced, will tour country from January 30 |publisher=NDTV |date=10 November 2012 |accessdate=23 November 2013}}</ref> When that day came, Hazare announced that he had formed Jantantra Morcha, a campaigning group that included the previously-named members of Team Anna 2.0 and which he considered to be a replacement for IAC but with a broader agenda.<ref>{{cite news |title=IAC is now Jantantra Morcha, says Anna |first=Rashi |last=Gaikwad |publisher=The Hindu |date=31 January 2013 |url=http://www.thehindu.com/news/national/other-states/iac-is-now-jantantra-morcha-says-anna/article4361529.ece |accessdate=23 November 2013}}</ref> | The new Team Anna, sometimes referred to as ''Team Anna 2.0'', was preparing to tour the country from 30 January 2013, coinciding with the death anniversary of ].<ref name="ndtv" >{{cite news |url=http://www.ndtv.com/article/india/team-anna-2-0-announced-will-tour-country-from-january-30-291098 |title=Team Anna 2.0 announced, will tour country from January 30 |publisher=NDTV |date=10 November 2012 |accessdate=23 November 2013}}</ref> When that day came, Hazare announced that he had formed Jantantra Morcha, a campaigning group that included the previously-named members of Team Anna 2.0 and which he considered to be a replacement for IAC but with a broader agenda.<ref>{{cite news |title=IAC is now Jantantra Morcha, says Anna |first=Rashi |last=Gaikwad |publisher=The Hindu |date=31 January 2013 |url=http://www.thehindu.com/news/national/other-states/iac-is-now-jantantra-morcha-says-anna/article4361529.ece |accessdate=23 November 2013}}</ref> | ||
According to the '']'' of 3 September 2013, "The group, which now runs — and claims to own — the IAC, mostly comprises Right to Information (RTI) activists. The group had taken over the IAC immediately after the split but held its first formal meeting on Monday ." The 2013 group's National Convenor is Sarbajit Roy.<ref>Khandekar, Nivedita (3 September 2013) . '']''. Retrieved 27 September 2014.</ref> | |||
== Notable people == | == Notable people == | ||
Line 62: | Line 63: | ||
*] | *] | ||
*] | *] | ||
== Sarbajit Roy (National Convenor) == | |||
'''Sarbajit Roy''' is a prominent ] activist and public interest litigation advocate, notable for successfully opposing some of India's largest corporates in the regulatory domain. He is also the current National Convenor of ] anti-corruption movement.<ref></ref><ref>{{cite news|title=Are activists barking at the wrong tree on political parties being under RTI?|url=http://www.moneylife.in/article/are-activists-barking-at-the-wrong-tree-on-political-parties-being-under-rti/33706.html|publisher=MoneyLife|date=July 19, 2013|location=Mumbai}}</ref><ref>{{cite news|title=Radio One Mumbai issues apology|url=http://www.radioandmusic.com/content/editorial/news/radio-one-fm-mumbai-issues-apology|publisher=Radio&Music|date=May 22, 2013|location=Mumbai}}</ref><ref>{{cite news|title=Anti-corruption body abandons Janlokpal|url=http://www.hindustantimes.com/India-news/NewDelhi/Anti-corruption-body-abandons-Janlokpal/Article1-1116543.aspx|publisher=Hindustan Times|author=Nivedita Khandekar|location=New Delhi|date= 3 September 2013|accessdate=September 3, 2013}}</ref> Sarbajit Roy was a "bad boy" in the early 1980s when he notably<ref>{{cite web|author=Anuja ; Cordelia Jenkins |url=http://www.livemint.com/2012/06/15233105/Subhash-Agrawal-RTI-crusader.html |title=Subhash Agrawal: RTI crusader |publisher=Livemint |date=2012-06-15 |accessdate=2012-11-16}}</ref> wrote India's first computer viruses. | |||
<ref>{{cite news|title=Four 4 Change|url=http://www.indianexpress.com/storyOld.php?storyId=79937|publisher=Indian Express|date=October 16, 2005|location=New Delhi}}</ref> An engineer from the ] Pilani in 1980, Roy has the triple distinction of having filed the first ] (RTI) request,<ref>{{cite news|title=Right to Information Act gets 1st applicant |url=http://www.isidelhi.org.in/hrnews/isidownload/Nhrc/Rti/RTI-2005.pdf|publisher=Asian Age|author=Urvashi Kaul|location=New Delhi|date= 4 October 2005|accessdate=September 4, 2013}}</ref> the first RTI Appeal and the first RTI Complaint under India's ].<ref>{{cite news|title=First proceeding under RTI Act |url=http://articles.timesofindia.indiatimes.com/2005-12-24/india/27863225_1_rti-act-dda-central-information-commission|publisher=Times of India|author=Manoj Mitta|location=New Delhi|date= 24 December 2005|accessdate=September 4, 2013}}</ref> | |||
Roy is well known for being the first activist to bring state conferred monopolies under the scope of India's ] hitherto applicable only to Government agencies. | |||
==Actions by Roy== | |||
===STBs don't meet BIS norms=== | |||
In December 2003, Sarbajit Roy approached the Supreme Court saying that 2 million recycled ] ] ]es being sold in the market for CAS did not meet the safety norms set by the ] and did not have BIS certification.<ref>{{cite news|title=Can your set-top box kill you|publisher=The Statesman|author=Aditya Kaul|location=New Delhi|date= 24 December 2003}}</ref> Sarbajit Roy approached the Supreme Court after the senior officers of Delhi Police were unsure of their jurisdiction to register the FIR on his complaint that flimsy STBs containing fatal voltages as high as 4000 Volt were being sold to consumers without the mandatory BIS certification. Senior police officers however said, "''We don't know what to do with the complaint. The matter has to be resolved at government level. It is the policy makers and BIS which has to take care of the matter''".<ref>{{cite news|title=Police yet to register FIR on engineer's compliant about STBs|publisher=The Statesman|author=Aditya Kaul|location=New Delhi|date= 25 December 2003}}</ref> The Supreme Court allowed the few existing CAS installations to continue and granted leave to Roy to intervene again in case the government revived the scheme. The STB manufacturer refused to accept back the defective STBs causing a huge loss to the importers. A similar story published in the Pioneer newspaper,<ref>{{cite news|title=STBs don't meet BIS norms|publisher=The Pioneer|author=Abraham Thomas|location=New Delhi|date= 30 December 2003}}</ref> got its editor ] sued for defamation along with Roy, which motion was eventually dismissed. | |||
===BPO Hacking=== | |||
Sarbajit Roy was the applicant in the ] case where a reporter from '']'' newspaper alleged in 2005 that India was an unsafe destination for BPOs as confidential data of UK citizens was being hawked on CDs.<ref>{{cite news|title=BPO fraud: Was it a sting or a set up?|publisher=NDTV|author=Priyam Bhasin|location=Gurgaon|date= 4 July 2005}}</ref> In his application Roy stated that to the contrary British banks routinely sent their confidential data on their defaulting customers (especially credit card defaulters) to shady call centres located in India operating without proper safeguards or regulation and the ''Sun'' story was an attempt to defame legitimate Indian BPOs.<ref>{{cite news|title=Complaint filed against Sun's online edition|publisher=Asian Age|author=Urvashi Kaul|location=New Delhi|date= 29 June 2005}}</ref> | |||
Although Roy's complaint was later dismissed in 2007 because he was not the owner of the affected computers, the case resulted in significant tightening to India's ] to "minimise data theft to make sure that the (IT industry's) security standards are internationally recognised."<ref>{{cite news|title=BPO fraud: Was it a sting or a set up?|publisher=NDTV|author=Priyam Bhasin|location=Gurgaon|date= 4 July 2005}}</ref> | |||
===Right to Information=== | |||
====No bar on voluminous requests for information==== | |||
Although the ] specifically provides that information has to be provided in the form requested unless it would disproportionately divert the resources of the public authority, unfortunately some departments have been using this provision to deny citizens access to information. This issue was the subject of the first complaint filed with the Central Information Commission (CIC) by Sarbajit Roy. After hearing the parties the CIC held that the Act does not authorise a public authority to deny information even if the information sought is voluminous.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.humanrightsinitiative.org/publications/rti/guide_to_use_rti_act_2005_revised.pdf |title=USER GUIDE FINAL OUT PUT NEW English 30-09-10.pmd |format=PDF |date= |accessdate=2012-11-16}}</ref> | |||
====Regulatory actions (Electricity sector)==== | |||
On Dec 3 2006 the ] ruled in Roy's case that the 3 private electricity distribution utilities (Discoms) of Delhi are public authority required to entertain applications under the ].<ref>{{cite news|title=Discoms not private concerns: CIC |url=http://www.tribuneindia.com/2006/20061204/delhi.htm#1|publisher=Tribune News Service|date=December 3, 2006|location=New Delhi}}</ref> This RTI ruling put the DISCOMS and their regulatory agency DERC at loggerheads with the DISCOMS saying they would rather provide information through the DERC and not be brought under the RTI while the DERC said the DISCOMS were taking recourse to technicalities to get away from the RTI.<ref>{{cite news|title=RTI ruling puts discoms, DERC at loggerheads|url=http://www.rtiindia.org/forum/235-rti-ruling-puts-discoms-derc-loggerheads.html|publisher=Indian Express|date=December 15, 2006|location=New Delhi}}</ref> The DISCOMS challenged this decision before the High Court claiming that they are privately owned and managed companies and did not meet the criteria mentioned in the RTI Act. The High Court referred the matter back to the Central Information Commission with the advice that the matter be heard once again by the full bench and an opportunity be given to the DISCOMS to present their case. After conducting more hearings the CIC arrived at the unanimous decision that the DISCOMS were indeed substantially financed by the Government of Delhi because assets of huge monetary value had been handed over to the DISCOMS when the original public sector power utility was privatized and split into multiple entities. The DISCOMS challenged this order before the High Court for a second time, with the same result.<ref>http://www.right2info.org/scope-of-bodies-covered-by-access-to-information/private-bodies-that-have-a-public-character#_ftn19</ref> | |||
====Quashing "CIC Management Regulations 2007"==== | |||
In 2010, a court case Roy initiated triggered the revising of India's Right to Information law, as the Delhi High Court declared the existing regulations as illegal in his case.<ref>{{cite news|title=Delhi High Court quashes RTI Act,CIC Management Regulations 2007|url=http://www.prlog.org/10429934-delhi-high-court-quashes-rti-actcic-management-regulations-2007.html|publisher=Delhi High Court Infowire|author=|location=New Delhi|date= 27 November 2009|accessdate=September 4, 2013}}</ref><ref>{{cite news|title=Judicial hurdles |url=http://www.hindu.com/thehindu/thscrip/print.pl?file=20100702271303400.htm&date=fl2713/&prd=fline&|publisher=Frontline|author=V Venkatesan|location=Chennai|date= 2 July 2010|accessdate=September 4, 2013}}</ref> This has led to protests among RTI activists.<ref>{{cite web|author= |url=http://nvonews.com/2010/12/17/protest-against-proposals-to-amend-the-rti-rules-regulations/ |title=Protest against proposals to amend the RTI Rules & Regulations | Northern Voices Online |publisher=Nvonews.com |date= |accessdate=2012-11-16}}</ref> and disrupted the work of the Central Information Commission and caused at least 2 RTI Information Commissioner to stop work <ref>{{cite news|title=Two Info Commissioners stop work after HC order|url=http://www.governancenow.com/gov-next/rti/two-info-commissioners-stop-work-after-hc-order|publisher=Governance Now|author=PTI|location=New Delhi|date= 26 May 2010|accessdate=September 5, 2013}}</ref> till the CIC decided to appeal it in the Supreme Court and "save itself from administrative chaos".<ref>{{cite news|title=SC rescues CIC from administrative chaos|url=http://articles.timesofindia.indiatimes.com/2010-10-19/india/28268107_1_cic-chief-information-commissioner-central-information-commission|publisher=Times of India|author=Dhananjay Mahapatra|location=New Delhi|date= 19 Oct 2010|accessdate=September 5, 2013}}</ref> | |||
====Unique Identity Authority of India held to be public body==== | |||
On 18.November.2009 on a complaint from Roy, India's FOI regulator held the ] to be a public authority liable to disclose its working to the public. Roy had alleged that the UIDAI, a controversial body headed by ] to collect and store ] IDs of Indian citizens, was fully operational, whereas the Indian Government contended that it never existed and had only a skeletal staff.<ref>{{cite news|title=Sh. Sarbjeet Roy vs Planning Commission on 18 November,2009|url=http://indiankanoon.org/doc/1846159/|publisher=Indian Kanoon|date=November 18, 2009|location=New Delhi}}</ref> After this decision was announced the ] was ejected from their offices in the middle of the night and had to seek new accommodation.<ref>{{cite news|title=UIDAI gets new address, to shift soon|url=http://www.rediff.com/money/report/tech-uidai-gets-new-address/20091118.htm|publisher=Rediff News (PTI)|date=November 18, 2009|location=New Delhi}}</ref> | |||
== See also == | == See also == |
Revision as of 11:46, 27 September 2014
Type | People's Movement |
---|---|
Focus | Anti-corruption |
Area served | India |
Key people | Anna Hazare, Arvind Kejriwal |
India Against Corruption (IAC), along with Team Anna, was a populist anti-corruption movement in India. It sought to mobilise the masses in support of their demands for a less corrupt society in India. It was headed mostly by middle-class professionals and lawyers and was particularly prominent during the anti-corruption protests of 2011 and 2012, the central point of which was debate concerning the introduction of a Jan Lokpal bill. The popular movement is distinct from a pressure group campaigning for Right to Information that bears the same name.
Those involved with the IAC core committee eventually diverged to form the Aam Aadmi Party and Jantantra Morcha.
Rise
See also: 2011 Indian anti-corruption movement and 2012 Indian anti-corruption movementAlison Brysk, a professor of political science, notes that the IAC popular protest movement began in a year when there were also major protests about corruption in countries such as Russia (sometimes called the Snow Revolution) and the US (Occupy Wall Street). She also says that the Arab Spring protests that began in late 2010 were "initially sparked by corruption - not regime change". Brysk believes that "Regardless of limited policy outcomes, each of these citizenship movements succeeded in communicating a political critique of social problems that had been seen previously as a consequence of tradition, abusive individuals, self-correcting markets, or bad luck. They were all movements that relied heavily on symbolism."
The official position of figureheads in the IAC movement was that it had no formal organisation beyond a 24-member core committee. In 2011, the mostly middle-class organisers of IAC determined to launch a campaign to mobilise the masses in support of a demand that they hoped would help to bring about a corruption-free India. Their proposal was for the creation of a Lokpal (ombudsman) who would have powers to arrest and charge government officials accused of corruption. They approached Ramdev, a populist yogi with millions of supporters among the middle-classes of small-town India, to be the figurehead for this campaign. His connections to the right-wing Sangh Parivar threatened to damage the credibility of what was nominally an apolitical movement. He was soon replaced by Anna Hazare, a veteran social reformer with a history of undertaking fasts in support of his causes. Hazare, too, brought a large support base with him, described by Meera Nanda as being largely "from urban middle-classes and idealistic youth". The urban sophistication of Hazare, compared to Ramdev's rusticity, attracted high-profile support for the campaign from Bollywood stars, the internet-savvy, and mainstream English-language news media. He, too, struggled to disassociate himself from Hindutva symbolism: hence, support from non-Hindus was less forthcoming.
Mahendra Prasad Singh, another professor of political science and a former Director of the Indian Council for Social Science Research, sees some similarity between the Hazare-led IAC movement and campaigns of the 1970s for which Jayaprakash Narayan was the figure-head. The significant difference, he says, is that rather than using "conventional means of political mobilisation, mainly thrived on the private electronic and social media, supplemented by mass congregation in cities".
Historian and commentator Ramachandra Guha has questioned the image that has been portrayed of IAC and of Hazare. Acknowledging that Hazare had previously been successful in campaigns for infrastructure reforms at the local level in his native Maharashtra and that the IAC campaign of 2011 had an impact, Guha doubts the claims that the 2011 and 2012 protests overwhelmingly engaged the masses. He notes that liberals were concerned with a perceived anti-democratic rhetoric while socially oppressed communities, such as the dalits and Other Backward Classes, were worried that the Hindu-led movement would undermine the gains they have made through legislative reforms, such as those resulting from the Mandal Commission. He considers that the attention given to the protest by 24-hour news channels and internet resources has masked the realities, such as that popular participation at the Jantar Mantar and Ramlila Maidan protests in Delhi was a fraction of that evidenced in Kolkata in 1998 when 400,000 marched in an anti-nuclear movement. IAC and Hazare in particular piggy-backed on and gained from discontent surrounding some coincident corruption scandals involving the government. These scandals, such as the 2G spectrum scam, were high-profile examples of the corruption that is claimed to be endemic in Indian society at all levels but Guha believes the IAC solution — the Lokpal — was a "simplistic" reaction.
Divergence
Those at the head of IAC became known as Team Anna. In late 2012, there was a split in the IAC movement caused by differences of opinion among the central figures regarding its lack of practical success and how much this might have been due to its unwillingness to be directly engaged in the political system. An IAC survey had suggested that direct involvement in politics was preferable, leading to Arvind Kejriwal and some others splitting to form the Aam Aadmi Party (AAP) in order to cause change from within the system. Hazare rejected the survey findings.
Hazare had announced that he was disbanding Team Anna in August 2012, around the time that the divisions were coming to a head. In November 2012, after the split, he said that he was forming a new Team Anna, that it would retain the label of India Against Corruption and that its members were discussing other societal issues that they might address.
The new Team Anna, sometimes referred to as Team Anna 2.0, was preparing to tour the country from 30 January 2013, coinciding with the death anniversary of Mahatma Gandhi. When that day came, Hazare announced that he had formed Jantantra Morcha, a campaigning group that included the previously-named members of Team Anna 2.0 and which he considered to be a replacement for IAC but with a broader agenda.
According to the Hindustan Times of 3 September 2013, "The group, which now runs — and claims to own — the IAC, mostly comprises Right to Information (RTI) activists. The group had taken over the IAC immediately after the split but held its first formal meeting on Monday ." The 2013 group's National Convenor is Sarbajit Roy.
Notable people
Notable members of IAC/Team Anna prior to the breakaway of the Aam Aadmi Party were:
- Anna Hazare
- Arvind Kejriwal
- Shanti Bhushan
- Prashant Bhushan
- Santosh Hegde
- Shazia Ilmi
- Medha Patkar
- Gopal Rai
- Sanjay Singh
- Manish Sisodia
- Kiran Bedi
- Kumar Vishwas
Following the split with the AAP, notable members were:
See also
References
- Brysk, Alison (2013). Speaking Rights to Power: Constructing Political Will. Oxford University Press. pp. 114–115. ISBN 978-0-19998-267-7.
- Ghosh, Abantika (29 December 2011). "Shifting stir to Mumbai a mistake: IAC". Indian Express. Retrieved 20 March 2014.
- ^ Guha, Ramachandra (2013). Patriots and Partisans: From Nehru to Hindutva and Beyond. Penguin UK. pp. 119–122. ISBN 9788184757538.
- "A PATRIARCH FOR THE NATION?". The Telegraph, Calcutta. 27 August 2011. Retrieved 5 September 2014.
- ^ Nanda, Meera (2011). The God Market: How Globalization is Making India More Hindu. NYU Press. pp. xxii–xxiii. ISBN 9781583673096.
- Singh, Mahendra Prasad (2013). "Administrative Reforms in India". In Sabharwal, Meghna; Berman, Evan M. (eds.). Public Administration in South Asia: India, Bangladesh, and Pakistan Public Administration and Public Policy. CRC Press. p. 152. ISBN 978-1-43986-911-6.
{{cite book}}
: line feed character in|title=
at position 69 (help) - Schoen, Douglas E. (2013). The End of Authority: How a Loss of Legitimacy and Broken Trust Are Endangering Our Future. Rowman & Littlefield. pp. 185–186. ISBN 9781442220324.
- "Anna Hazare tells Arvind Kejriwal not to use his name, photo for votes as they part ways". New Delhi: India Today. PTI. 19 September 2012. Retrieved 12 June 2013.
- "So what is the Aam Aadmi Party all about". New Delhi: India Today. 24 November 2012. Retrieved 12 June 2013.
- "Hazare disbands Team Anna, says no talks with govt on Lokpal". The Times of India. 6 August 2012. Retrieved 23 November 2013.
- "After announcing team, Anna Hazare to inaugurate new office in Delhi". IBN Live. 11 November 2012. Retrieved 23 November 2013.
- "Team Anna gets new people. But will their gameplan be a game-changer?". India Today. 15 November 2012. Retrieved 23 November 2013.
- ^ "Team Anna 2.0 announced, will tour country from January 30". NDTV. 10 November 2012. Retrieved 23 November 2013.
- Gaikwad, Rashi (31 January 2013). "IAC is now Jantantra Morcha, says Anna". The Hindu. Retrieved 23 November 2013.
- Khandekar, Nivedita (3 September 2013) "Anti-corruption body abandons Janlokpal". Hindustan Times. Retrieved 27 September 2014.
Further reading
- Hensman, Rohini (September 2011). "Converging agendas: Team Anna and the Indian Right". Retrieved 23 November 2013.
- Megwanshi, Bhanwar (5 September 2011). "India: The Communal Character of Anna Hazare's Movement". Retrieved 23 November 2013.
Corruption in India | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Anti-corruption activism | |||||||
Legislation |
| ||||||
Other |