| Revision as of 22:37, 8 July 2006 editAplomado (talk | contribs)Pending changes reviewers3,159 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit | Revision as of 23:54, 8 July 2006 edit undoJean Mercer (talk | contribs)1,194 editsNo edit summaryNext edit → | ||
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
| All of this appears to violate Misplaced Pages's ] and ] policies. ] says this kind of writing is probably not acceptable: ''It introduces an analysis or synthesis of established facts, ideas, opinions, or arguments in a way that builds a particular case favored by the editor, without attributing that analysis or synthesis to a reputable source...'' I'd suggest that someone who knows more about the subject clean it up to make it more balanced. ] <sup>]</sup> 22:34, 8 July 2006 (UTC) | All of this appears to violate Misplaced Pages's ] and ] policies. ] says this kind of writing is probably not acceptable: ''It introduces an analysis or synthesis of established facts, ideas, opinions, or arguments in a way that builds a particular case favored by the editor, without attributing that analysis or synthesis to a reputable source...'' I'd suggest that someone who knows more about the subject clean it up to make it more balanced. ] <sup>]</sup> 22:34, 8 July 2006 (UTC) | ||
| Does this mean that no article on Misplaced Pages can reject a dangerous or inappropriate practice-- that "pseudosymmetry" is a requirement? | |||
| As for sources, in this case, I, the author, am a reputable source, and I have cited my own work. I just didn't finish typing out all the references yet. Jean Mercer | |||
Revision as of 23:54, 8 July 2006
POV concerns
This article appears to be an essay. Consider the following sections:
- An analysis of the actual theoretical basis of Attachment Therapy would be inappropriately lengthy )see mercer, 2003), but there are clear connections between AT and such psychoanalytic outliers as Fernczi, Groddeck, Rank, and Reich,all of whom emphasized the role of very early experience and considered physical interaction part of therapy.
- In every case, the evidencepresented has failed to meet the criteria for evidence-based treatment (see Mercer, 2002). The most serious problem of these studies has involved the confounding of variables created by self-selection of treatment and comparison groups.
- From the recently-deleted "Conclusions" section: Attachment Therapy, with the characteristics described above, are not appropriate otr effective mental health interventions for children. It should be noted that most conventional psychotherapies for children work with social relationships and with parent-child interactions and thus are effective techniques for dealing with problems of attachment where they exist.
All of this appears to violate Misplaced Pages's neutral point of view and original research policies. WP:OR says this kind of writing is probably not acceptable: It introduces an analysis or synthesis of established facts, ideas, opinions, or arguments in a way that builds a particular case favored by the editor, without attributing that analysis or synthesis to a reputable source... I'd suggest that someone who knows more about the subject clean it up to make it more balanced. Aplomado 22:34, 8 July 2006 (UTC)
Does this mean that no article on Misplaced Pages can reject a dangerous or inappropriate practice-- that "pseudosymmetry" is a requirement? As for sources, in this case, I, the author, am a reputable source, and I have cited my own work. I just didn't finish typing out all the references yet. Jean Mercer