Misplaced Pages

Talk:Helen Hooven Santmyer: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 17:47, 12 September 2014 editAnomieBOT (talk | contribs)Bots6,553,096 editsm Tagging with {{WikiProject Women writers}} per request. Errors? User:AnomieBOT/shutoff/WikiProjectWorker← Previous edit Revision as of 22:19, 5 October 2014 edit undoWinkelvi (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers30,145 edits Lack of reliable sources: new sectionNext edit →
Line 11: Line 11:
{{WikiProject Women writers|importance=|class=stub|auto=stub}} {{WikiProject Women writers|importance=|class=stub|auto=stub}}
}} }}

== Lack of reliable sources ==

Due to what appears to be an article laden with original research, a sources needed template has been placed at the top of the article page. One editor reverted, noting, "Statements on weakness, obscurity, Hollywood, chance are based on RS". That may be the case, however, since no sources are cited in connection with the majority of the article, it is imperative that such content be sourced properly and according to policy. As it is currently, the article is sorely lacking in references. This needs to be rectified before the template can be removed. -- <span style="text-shadow: 4px 4px 15px #0099FF, -4px -4px 15px #99FF00;">]</span> ● <span style="text-shadow: 4px 4px 15px #FF9900, -4px -4px 15px #FF0099;">] ]</span> 22:19, 5 October 2014 (UTC)

Revision as of 22:19, 5 October 2014

This article has not yet been rated on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
WikiProject iconUniversity of Oxford
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject University of Oxford, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the University of Oxford on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.University of OxfordWikipedia:WikiProject University of OxfordTemplate:WikiProject University of OxfordUniversity of Oxford
???This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
WikiProject iconUnited States: Ohio Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by WikiProject Ohio.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
WikiProject iconBiography: Arts and Entertainment
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Misplaced Pages's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by the arts and entertainment work group.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
WikiProject iconWomen's History Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Women's History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women's history and related articles on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women's HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject Women's HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Women's HistoryWomen's History
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
WikiProject iconWomen writers
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Women writers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women writers on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women writersWikipedia:WikiProject Women writersTemplate:WikiProject Women writersWomen writers
???This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Lack of reliable sources

Due to what appears to be an article laden with original research, a sources needed template has been placed at the top of the article page. One editor reverted, noting, "Statements on weakness, obscurity, Hollywood, chance are based on RS". That may be the case, however, since no sources are cited in connection with the majority of the article, it is imperative that such content be sourced properly and according to policy. As it is currently, the article is sorely lacking in references. This needs to be rectified before the template can be removed. -- WV 22:19, 5 October 2014 (UTC)

Categories: