Misplaced Pages

User talk:Malik Shabazz: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 01:05, 6 October 2014 editLowercase sigmabot III (talk | contribs)Bots, Template editors2,291,177 editsm Archiving 1 discussion(s) to User talk:Malik Shabazz/Archive 49) (bot← Previous edit Revision as of 14:25, 6 October 2014 edit undoPoeticbent (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers29,717 edits WP:DENY: new sectionNext edit →
Line 68: Line 68:
</div></div> </div></div>
<!-- Message sent by User:LivingBot@enwiki using the list at http://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:Wikipedia_Signpost/Tools/Spamlist&oldid=628117353 --> <!-- Message sent by User:LivingBot@enwiki using the list at http://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:Wikipedia_Signpost/Tools/Spamlist&oldid=628117353 -->

== WP:DENY ==

Would you please remove a few edits from the history of some articles for me? I'd like to ] this user the privilege of having his grossly offensive username memorialized in them. ''See:'' , and his Thanks in advance, ] ] 14:25, 6 October 2014 (UTC)

Revision as of 14:25, 6 October 2014

User:Malik Shabazz/Tabs

User talk
Are you here because I deleted your article? Please read this before you leave me a message.
This is Malik Shabazz's talk page, where you can send him messages and comments.
Archives: 1Auto-archiving period: 5 days 

Search the Archives


This page has archives. Sections older than 5 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 2 sections are present.

CRT on the Supreme Court

Hi Malik, Your improvements to the critical race theory page caught my attention. To my interest, my research has turned up that Sonia Sotomayor was strongly influenced by CRT some years ago and is the only one on the Supreme Court with this in her history. During the last week, I have been adding material from 3 new books on the Roberts court to her page and am almost done. Because of her unique background, I thought to ask you if the article is anywhere close to an upgrade by peer evaluation. She would be the first woman on the Supreme Court to reach the highest level of peer evaluation at Misplaced Pages. Possibly you could give the article a once over when/if time allows to let me know if this unique judge deserves this attention. I ask this only if this field is of interest to you and if time allows. LawrencePrincipe (talk) 00:29, 19 July 2014 (UTC)

Hi Lawrence. I'll try to take a look at Sonia Sotomayor in the next week or so, but my schedule is tight and I may not be able. You might want to request a review at WP:Peer review. — Malik Shabazz /Stalk 02:46, 19 July 2014 (UTC)
Thanks. LawrencePrincipe (talk) 12:25, 19 July 2014 (UTC)

School assignment

You're a busy person, I know. Here's a little challenge for you. Greenville-Weston High School is the 3rd largest HS in Mississippi, located in the impoverished MS Delta region. Take half a day when you can and start writing that piece on that should-be-in-Misplaced Pages institution as well as you can from the sources available. You will find it an enlightening process, I guarantee you. Carrite (talk) 17:02, 24 September 2014 (UTC)

And here's a YouTube video to help you decide to take on this arcane challenge: "Mississippi Delta Poverty". Carrite (talk) 17:11, 24 September 2014 (UTC)
I'm literally in the middle of moving, but as soon as I get settled I'll write the article. — Malik Shabazz /Stalk 17:32, 24 September 2014 (UTC)

NO spin USA responding to aclu edit that was removed by other member.

the article said......ACLU is a non-partisan organisation. but this is false. they have a very liberal agenda, transgender surgery,amnesty to undocumented illigals, promote the seperation of church and state,( they never get tired of that, have they read the constitution?.) they sew and attack public displays of faith, and i think you know this very well, christmas is shoved behind closed doors, when americans have the right to express their own culture. it was not my own commentary, it was a statement, a fact. they are very left wing. its the aclu. neutral point of view means you cant make it a blog page, it doesnt mean you have to load an article with PC. you have pounced on me twice at very different ocassions and on totally different articles. im not saying your a troll, but there are "trolls on patrol", making sure no facts are out there that might hurt some ones feelings, or not appease to ones falsehoods. the aclu is what it is, wikipedia tells none of it, they create no awarreness, they just give a cliche shallow definition. Im here to to tell it how it is, you are not, i assume. if some one throws up on a page, expect it to be cleaned up, you can not and will not be going around on witch hunts. very shakey, false-like articles are going to be cleaned up, you surfing around, messing with me, wont fly. i feel you are an antagonist to an honest wikipedia.

actual aclu.......wikipedias vesrion of it.........some one fixes up the innacuracy.....gets trolled. we will win. — Preceding unsigned comment added by No Spin USA (talkcontribs) 19:13, 2 October 2014 (UTC)

Write a blog. — Malik Shabazz /Stalk 19:18, 2 October 2014 (UTC)

No SPin USA again. standing up to malik.

my own personal analysis violates nothing. sepecially when its fact based, a fact that is missing from the pussy -foot articles due to 'demands from unpredictable crazies". your analysis on subject is allowed, you ca edit, revise, and ect.. freely. you pouned on me after 5 min, as you did 1 month ago on a totally different subject. your efforts are useless, the truth you hate will always make itself known. — Preceding unsigned comment added by No Spin USA (talkcontribs) 19:27, 2 October 2014 (UTC)

Please read WP:NPOV. If you can't agree to it, you don't belong here. — Malik Shabazz /Stalk 19:32, 2 October 2014 (UTC)

The Signpost: 01 October 2014

WP:DENY

Would you please remove a few edits from the history of some articles for me? I'd like to WP:DENY this user the privilege of having his grossly offensive username memorialized in them. See: UAA report, and his indef. Thanks in advance, Poeticbent talk 14:25, 6 October 2014 (UTC)