| Revision as of 01:17, 7 October 2014 editDark Liberty (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users1,475 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit | Revision as of 01:36, 7 October 2014 edit undoRGloucester (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Page movers, Pending changes reviewers38,757 edits Warning: Violating the three-revert rule on 2014 Hong Kong protests. (TW)Next edit → | ||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
| I just want to thank you for vastly improving the Chengdu J-20 page. Keep up the good work! --] (]) 02:17, 20 February 2014 (UTC) | I just want to thank you for vastly improving the Chengdu J-20 page. Keep up the good work! --] (]) 02:17, 20 February 2014 (UTC) | ||
| :Yes, I was also going to commend you for your improvements to that article. Excellent job. --]]<sub>(])</sub> 19:19, 27 February 2014 (UTC) | :Yes, I was also going to commend you for your improvements to that article. Excellent job. --]]<sub>(])</sub> 19:19, 27 February 2014 (UTC) | ||
| == October 2014 == | |||
| ] Your recent editing history at ] shows that you are currently engaged in an ]. '''Being involved in an edit war can result in your being ]'''—especially if you violate the ], which states that an editor must not perform more than three ] on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—'''even if you don't violate the three-revert rule'''—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. | |||
| To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's ] to work toward making a version that represents ] among editors. See ] for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant ] or seek ]. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary ]. <!-- Template:uw-3rr --> ] — ] 01:36, 7 October 2014 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 01:36, 7 October 2014
Your J-20 Updates
I just want to thank you for vastly improving the Chengdu J-20 page. Keep up the good work! --Balon Greyjoy (talk) 02:17, 20 February 2014 (UTC)
- Yes, I was also going to commend you for your improvements to that article. Excellent job. --NickPenguin(contribs) 19:19, 27 February 2014 (UTC)
October 2014
Your recent editing history at 2014 Hong Kong protests shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. RGloucester — ☎ 01:36, 7 October 2014 (UTC)