Misplaced Pages

Introduction to Psychoanalysis: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 10:29, 6 October 2014 editJacobisq (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Rollbackers9,371 edits add reshape refimprove← Previous edit Revision as of 09:57, 7 October 2014 edit undoJacobisq (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Rollbackers9,371 edits add, detagNext edit →
Line 1: Line 1:
{{multiple issues|
{{Underlinked|date=December 2013}}
{{more footnotes|date=January 2010}}
}}

{{italic title}} {{italic title}}


Line 9: Line 4:


Some of the positions outlined here would subsequently be altered or revised in Freud's later work; and in 1932 he offered a second set of seven lectures numbered from 29-35 - ''New Introductory Lectures on Psychoanalysis'' - as complement (though these were never read aloud and featured a different, sometimes more polemical style of presentation.) Some of the positions outlined here would subsequently be altered or revised in Freud's later work; and in 1932 he offered a second set of seven lectures numbered from 29-35 - ''New Introductory Lectures on Psychoanalysis'' - as complement (though these were never read aloud and featured a different, sometimes more polemical style of presentation.)

==Contents==


This work offers the reader acquainted with the concepts of Freud, to trace the logic of his arguments and to join his conclusions. The form of "Lectures" Freud allows lively polemical, is constantly engaging the reader in a discussion to justify their views, back them up with examples from life and from clinical practice, to identify not clarifying and weaknesses of the theory needs further elaboration. This work offers the reader acquainted with the concepts of Freud, to trace the logic of his arguments and to join his conclusions. The form of "Lectures" Freud allows lively polemical, is constantly engaging the reader in a discussion to justify their views, back them up with examples from life and from clinical practice, to identify not clarifying and weaknesses of the theory needs further elaboration.


==Appraisals==
According to the preface:
*] considered the lectures elementary in the best sense, for presenting the core elements of psychoanalysis in an accessible way.<ref>Peter Gay, ''Freud'' (1989) p. 369</ref>


*] in his preface to the 1920 American translation wrote:
<blockquote>These twenty-eight lectures to laymen are elementary and almost conversational. Freud sets forth with a frankness almost startling the difficulties and limitations of ], and also describes its main methods and results as only a master and originator of a new school of thought can do. These dis courses are at the same time simple and almost confidential, and they trace and sum up the results of thirty years of devoted and painstaking research. While they are not at all controversial, we incidentally see in a clearer light the distinctions between the master and some of his distinguished pupils.<ref>Freud. Sigmund: ''Introduction to Psychoanalysis'', PREFACE BY G. STANLEY HALL PRESIDENT, 1920</ref> <blockquote>These twenty-eight lectures to laymen are elementary and almost conversational. Freud sets forth with a frankness almost startling the difficulties and limitations of ], and also describes its main methods and results as only a master and originator of a new school of thought can do. These discourses are at the same time simple and almost confidential, and they trace and sum up the results of thirty years of devoted and painstaking research. While they are not at all controversial, we incidentally see in a clearer light the distinctions between the master and some of his distinguished pupils.<ref>Freud. Sigmund: ''Introduction to Psychoanalysis'', PREFACE BY G. STANLEY HALL PRESIDENT, 1920</ref>
</blockquote> </blockquote>

*Freud himself was typically self-deprecating about the finished work, describing it privately as "coarse work, intended for the multitude".<ref>Peter Gay, ''Freud'' (1989) p. 369</ref>


==Notes== ==Notes==

Revision as of 09:57, 7 October 2014

Introduction to Psychoanalysis or Introductory Lectures on Psycho-Analysis (Template:Lang-de) is a set of lectures given by Sigmund Freud 1915-17 (published 1916-17), which became the most popular and widely translated of his works. The 28 lectures offered an elementary stock-taking of his views of the unconscious, dreams, and the theory of neuroses at the time of writing, as well as offering some new technical material to the more advanced reader.

Some of the positions outlined here would subsequently be altered or revised in Freud's later work; and in 1932 he offered a second set of seven lectures numbered from 29-35 - New Introductory Lectures on Psychoanalysis - as complement (though these were never read aloud and featured a different, sometimes more polemical style of presentation.)

Contents

This work offers the reader acquainted with the concepts of Freud, to trace the logic of his arguments and to join his conclusions. The form of "Lectures" Freud allows lively polemical, is constantly engaging the reader in a discussion to justify their views, back them up with examples from life and from clinical practice, to identify not clarifying and weaknesses of the theory needs further elaboration.

Appraisals

  • Karl Abraham considered the lectures elementary in the best sense, for presenting the core elements of psychoanalysis in an accessible way.

These twenty-eight lectures to laymen are elementary and almost conversational. Freud sets forth with a frankness almost startling the difficulties and limitations of psychoanalysis, and also describes its main methods and results as only a master and originator of a new school of thought can do. These discourses are at the same time simple and almost confidential, and they trace and sum up the results of thirty years of devoted and painstaking research. While they are not at all controversial, we incidentally see in a clearer light the distinctions between the master and some of his distinguished pupils.

  • Freud himself was typically self-deprecating about the finished work, describing it privately as "coarse work, intended for the multitude".

Notes

  1. Editor's Introduction, Sigmund Freud, Introductory Lectures on Psycho-Analysis (PFL 1) p.31
  2. Editor's Introduction, Sigmund Freud, Introductory Lectures on Psycho-Analysis (PFL 1) p.32-3
  3. Peter Gay, Freud (1989) p. 369
  4. Freud. Sigmund: Introduction to Psychoanalysis, PREFACE BY G. STANLEY HALL PRESIDENT, 1920
  5. Peter Gay, Freud (1989) p. 369
Sigmund Freud
Books
Essays
Case studies
Original
concepts
Related
Cultural
depictions
Family
Categories: