Misplaced Pages

Revision as of 00:09, 12 October 2014

Thunderbolt Ross

Hi. Welcome to Misplaced Pages, and thanks for working to improve the site with your edit to Thunderbolt Ross, as we really appreciate your participation. However, the edit had to be reverted, because Misplaced Pages cannot accept unsourced material or original research. This includes material lacking cited sources, or obtained through personal knowledge or unpublished synthesis of previously published material. Misplaced Pages requires that all material added to articles be accompanied by reliable, verifiable sources explicitly cited in the text in the form of an inline citation, which you can learn to make here. I did a Google Search on the clip in question, and found it at Marvel.com, and Ross does not appear in it. (If I'm mistaken, and there is a different clip with him in it, please provide a reliable source for it.)

If you have any other questions about editing, or need help regarding the site's policies, just let me know by leaving a message for me in a new section at the bottom of my talk page. Thanks. :-) Nightscream (talk) 14:33, 10 September 2011 (UTC)

File source and copyright licensing problem with File:Consultant.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Consultant.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status and its source. Misplaced Pages takes copyright very seriously.

If you did not create this work entirely yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. You will also need to state under what licensing terms it was released. Please refer to the image use policy to learn what files you can or cannot upload on Misplaced Pages. The page on copyright tags may help you to find the correct tag to use for your file.

Please add this information by editing the image description page. If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please also check any other files you may have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. ww2censor (talk) 04:32, 11 September 2011 (UTC)

File source and copyright licensing problem with File:Consultant.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Consultant.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status and its source. Misplaced Pages takes copyright very seriously.

If you did not create this work entirely yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. You will also need to state under what licensing terms it was released. Please refer to the image use policy to learn what files you can or cannot upload on Misplaced Pages. The page on copyright tags may help you to find the correct tag to use for your file.

Please add this information by editing the image description page. If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please also check any other files you may have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. ww2censor (talk) 04:48, 11 September 2011 (UTC)

September 2011

Welcome to Misplaced Pages. It might not have been your intention, but you removed a speedy deletion tag from File:Consultant.jpg, a page you have created yourself. If you believe the page should not be deleted, you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Click here to contest this speedy deletion and appears inside the speedy deletion notice. This will allow you to make your case on the page's talk page. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. Thank you. ww2censor (talk) 04:49, 11 September 2011 (UTC)

Thor 2

As another editor notes at Marvel Cinematic Universe, we do not re-revert without discussion. I would additionally note that we do not link to copy-cat sites but to the original sources of reporting, which in the Natalie Portman item is Entertainment Weekly here. Thanks. --Tenebrae (talk) 21:36, 24 September 2011 (UTC)

DOIM

Merge discussion for Dragons In Our Midst

An article that you have been involved in editing, Dragons In Our Midst , has been proposed for a merge with another article. If you are interested in the merge discussion, please participate by going here, and adding your comments on the discussion page. Thank you. Mozillaman (talk) 18:19, 4 January 2012 (UTC)

Article notability notification

Hello. This message is to inform you that an article that you wrote, Marvel One-Shots, has been recently tagged with a notability notice. This means that it may not meet Misplaced Pages's notability guidelines. Please note that articles which do not meet these criteria may be merged, redirected, or deleted. Please consider adding reliable, secondary sources to the article in order to establish the topic's notability. You may find the following links useful when searching for sources: Find sources: "Marvel One-Shots" – news · books · scholar · JSTOR · free images. Thank you for editing Misplaced Pages! VoxelBot 20:30, 24 May 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 13

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Misplaced Pages appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited The Hobbit (film series), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Luke Evans (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:57, 13 December 2013 (UTC)

Music of the Marvel Cinematic Universe

I just want you to know, that I am in the process of moving this article back to my sandbox for two reasons: 1) By moving the page as you did, it moved my sandbox history with it, something that I don't want on that article, and should not be on that article. 2) I don't feel the article is ready for the main space. While I appreciate the contributions you did to it, it was very much just copy and pasted info from the already existing soundtrack articles. If this page is to be done, it needs to be more than just a copy/paste of information. - Favre1fan93 (talk) 05:54, 24 May 2014 (UTC)

Hey, I understand, and I am sorry for any inconveniences I have caused. I, like you, only wish the best for the articles and the encyclopedia. Thanks for the message! - adamstom97 (talk) 10:44, 24 May 2014 (UTC)

Recent edits

Hey Adam. I know you are trying to make worthwhile edits to the Marvel Cinematic Universe pages, but recently some of your edits have been very rash. They are in good faith, but they are removing content that does not need to be removed at the moment. While we are working on getting these pages the be the best that they can be, in my opinion, things are not done very rashly. Either on the article talk pages, or among the top contributor's talk pages, we discuss potential editions, or make stuff in our sandboxes as I have been doing, before implementing them, to share with everyone. At least for me, I make sure if I am doing sandbox work, I have everything up to par to get it to the mainspace before I actually do, meaning it has a copy edit, everything is sourced, and has a general style/formula similar to the other pages. - Favre1fan93 (talk) 03:17, 1 June 2014 (UTC)

I also see that you have been working a lot on the comic article, which I greatly appreciated. Just some notes, all those tables you made, need to have sources for each title. As well, all prose on the page need sources, and I'm pretty sure that some of the sources that are on there need replacing. - Favre1fan93 (talk) 03:19, 1 June 2014 (UTC)

Once again, thanks for the message. Although i have been editing Misplaced Pages for a while, i have only gotten really interested quite recently, so all of the feedback etc. is greatly appreciated. I will try and focus on sources for the comics page as soon as i have time. - adamstom97 (talk) 04:01, 1 June 2014 (UTC)

You're welcome. If you have thoughts on something, and aren't sure if it could go either way for the edit sticking, or being undone, feel free to drop me a note, or as I said, take to one of the MCU article talk pages it would most be applied to. Or if you just want to discuss a general gameplan for tackling or improving something. - Favre1fan93 (talk) 04:52, 1 June 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for June 1

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Misplaced Pages appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of Marvel Cinematic Universe tie-in comics, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Avengers (film) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:52, 1 June 2014 (UTC)

June 2014

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Misplaced Pages. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been reverted or removed.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor then please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Misplaced Pages's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Misplaced Pages's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive, until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively could result in loss of editing privileges.

As I stated above, your edits are coming off very bold and rash, and are now being viewed as disruptive. Favre1fan93 (talk) 13:13, 2 June 2014 (UTC)

Marvel Cinematic Universe

Hi, I'm Jodosma, I noticed you removed some info from Marvel Cinematic Universe which caused a cite error because your edit removed references which were named refs. You can see the edit here if you wish. Because of your edit, other refs which referred to the ones you took out were left without a definition, which caused the error. I'm sure this was an inadvertent error which you may wish to correct. Jodosma (talk) 19:36, 7 June 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for June 8

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Misplaced Pages appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of Marvel Cinematic Universe tie-in comics, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Neil Edwards (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:53, 8 June 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 24

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Misplaced Pages appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Marvel Cinematic Universe tie-in comics, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages James Gunn, SSR and HYDRA. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:54, 24 July 2014 (UTC)

Doctor Strange Release Date

Now that Comic-Con has passed without any Doctor Strange announcements, your input is once again requested regarding Doctor Strange's release date. -AnonWikiEditor (talk) 23:06, 29 July 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 31

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Misplaced Pages appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of Marvel Cinematic Universe films, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Cineplex. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:29, 31 July 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 7

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Misplaced Pages appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Pilot (Agents of S.H.I.E.L.D.), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Paul Lee. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:54, 7 August 2014 (UTC)

MCU television actors page

Just so you know, I like what you have started. Though, I feel it may be a harder sell in the wider community to create. I feel that, unlike the films, if we were to make tables with every single character (already or will be listed on each show's individual page) a very good majority will not be the ones crossing over to other shows. As I thought, we should really let all these shows establish themselves, with the smaller form table I have on what will be the main tv page, and then see if your's will be a good addition. I'm not telling you to stop adding to it, or formatting it and such, but I just want you to know that it will be a hard sell as I see it, given what we already have and what will be created (most likely List of pages for Agent Carter only, Daredevil only, etc.) . - Favre1fan93 (talk) 15:53, 11 August 2014 (UTC)

I understand that, and I think a more probable solution is to have individual character pages for each series, with the combining table on the list of television series page, and then when that table gets to big for the page, spin that off into its own page, probably called something like List of Marvel Cinematic Universe television series recurring actors. However, I think we should keep this page for now, and people can help improve it if they want, until such a time as we decide to move ahead with this or a similar plan. - adamstom97 (talk) 21:31, 11 August 2014 (UTC)

@Favre1fan93: Now that the tv page has been moved to the mainspace, and news is really starting to ramp up as we get close to SHIELD season 2, I see that my idea above is sounding like somewhere to aim for, but I thought I might check with you first, so that hopefully we can be on the same page. As we have gotten more and more casting news for the upcoming shows, the cast table on the tv page has grown, and now it doesn't even all fit on my screen at once. That is fine for now, but as more shows are added, soon the table will be both too long and too wide, so the scrolling div option from the films page won't really work either. At that point, I think we should replace the table with maybe a paragraph summarising it, and have a main article link to List of Marvel Cinematic Universe television series actors. I have already cut it down some, to only include principles, recurring, and crossovers, so it is inline with what is on the main page, but we will be able to fit all of the shows in because of the separated tv seasons format. The list of characters page(s) will remain, as they will list all guest stars as well, and focus on more of the in-universe stuff that a cast table avoids, but this page will be an easy to navigate summary of the main casts of the shows, the crossovers between seasons/shows, and of course the crossovers with other mediums. I definitely think this is where we should be headed, but it is more of a long-term goal I think. I would be interested in any thoughts you have on this. - adamstom97 (talk) 05:04, 5 September 2014 (UTC)

I will (eventually) take the time to look at this and let you know. - Favre1fan93 (talk) 18:42, 7 September 2014 (UTC)

That's fine, like I said, no hurry. - adamstom97 (talk) 02:55, 8 September 2014 (UTC)

MCU television series page

Just so you know, I have just requested for the redirect on the article to be deleted so I can move my draft. - Favre1fan93 (talk) 05:46, 20 August 2014 (UTC)

Star Trek infobox

Hi Adamstom, if you would like to discuss your suggested changes we can do it here or on the article's talk page, but please don't revert it again without discussion; we don't want you risking wp:3rr Cryomantic (talk) 14:36, 26 August 2014 (UTC)

Sorry, I don't want to start an edit war, I just think that is really unnecessary. The films are already listed on the page, and the article I linked to also lists them, which uncluters the infobox a lot. If there was an individual page for the TV series like the film one, I would suggest doing the same thing there. This is also done at Marvel Cinematic Universe, and I think it is better for all round tidiness of the page. - adamstom97 (talk) 04:34, 27 August 2014 (UTC)

I understand what you mean in regards to minimizing clutter, however it is currently laid out in the same format as many Misplaced Pages pages of similar subjects. I have also looked at the Marvel page that you have mentioned and I would believe that the method used there is somewhat because the series as a whole is made up of several sub-series, some of which have had previous incarnations/ iterations, add in the fact that there are other current marvel series (eg: X-Men) that are not included and I agree it does help in that instance to make clear which productions are included in that particular canon and their relation to each other. However for Star Trek it is far more straightforward as beyond the Paramount produced films there are only parody and fan works, therefore there is no reason to over complicate the matter as they all follow each other in order without any major nods to each other aside from the Spock trilogy (films 2 to 4). 178.78.123.66 (talk) 12:15, 27 August 2014 (UTC)

I guess its fine for now, but if at any point there is also a list of television series page as well, I would probably suggest coming back to this format, and just having those two articles in the infobox. - adamstom97 (talk) 19:55, 27 August 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 3

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Misplaced Pages appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Pilot (Agents of S.H.I.E.L.D.), you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Variety and Iron Man (film). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:24, 3 September 2014 (UTC)

Image without license

Unspecified source/license for File:Akela Amador theme.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Akela Amador theme.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Misplaced Pages's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Misplaced Pages can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|CC-by-sa-3.0|GFDL}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Misplaced Pages:Image use policy
• Misplaced Pages:Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Misplaced Pages:Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot 08:45, 7 September 2014 (UTC)

Agents of S.H.I.E.L.D. episode pages

Thanks for making the pages but are you sure that they are start class articles. I've been making episode pages for Continuum and had them accessed at C-class articles and yours seem to be a lot more in depth and well written than mine. Perhaps you would like to submit them for grading at Misplaced Pages:WikiProject Television/Assessment--Ditto51 (My Talk Page) 14:12, 7 September 2014 (UTC)

Adam, if you create the pages as you do, with all that content, make them C-class from the get go. - Favre1fan93 (talk) 17:46, 7 September 2014 (UTC)

Okay, I wasn't sure so I just played it safe. Will do from now on. - adamstom97 (talk) 02:56, 8 September 2014 (UTC)

AoS season 1 reception

If you are planning to expand this, here are refs I've saved to eventually include. Some you may have just added:

http://www.zap2it.com/blogs/marvels_agents_of_shield_shaped_up_to_be_an_incredible_show-2014-05

http://www.forbes.com/sites/merrillbarr/2014/05/12/review-the-agents-of-s-h-i-e-l-d-season-finale-plants-marvels-flag-on-the-small-screen/

http://www.ign.com/articles/2014/05/13/preview-agents-of-shield-ends-season-1-on-a-strong-note

http://www.ign.com/articles/2014/05/22/marvels-agents-of-shield-season-1-review

http://www.ign.com/articles/2014/05/14/agents-of-shield-producers-discuss-season-1s-finale-and-what-to-expect-in-season-2

http://www.latimes.com/entertainment/tv/la-et-st-critics-notebook-agents-of-shield-20140513-column.html

- Favre1fan93 (talk) 04:10, 19 September 2014 (UTC)

Cool, I'll have a look. - adamstom97 (talk) 04:17, 19 September 2014 (UTC)

@Favre1fan93: I was also wondering what your timetable was in terms of a possible good article nomination for the page? It is a substantial article, and far better, in my opinion, then any other season article I have read. Also, the season itself has long since finished, so it's not like anything major is going to change any time soon. I would be happy to help out with anything needing to be done before or during it as well. - adamstom97 (talk) 06:11, 19 September 2014 (UTC)

Probably not until December at the earliest. We don't want to rush into a nomination. - Favre1fan93 (talk) 15:56, 19 September 2014 (UTC)

Advice

If you are gonna revert things, make sure you review what you are reverting. Not only you reverted my edit which removed your questionable contributions, but you also reverted the updated box-office gross and added back multiple sources which aren't needed.--SuperHotWiki (talk) 11:08, 19 September 2014 (UTC)

Questionable contributions? I am only bringing the page in line with the other alike pages on wikipedia: List of Marvel Cinematic Universe films, Spider-Man in film, Batman in film, Terminator (franchise), to name a few. If you make a negative change and a positive change at the same time, then it is up to you to restore the positive change when your negative change is reverted, unless someone else is kind enough to do it. Seeing as you gave no one any time to do this, you are not really in any position to give "advice". Now, I am going to give you some advice: If you are going to be so bold as to revert someone's edit, at least don't be a coward about it. We are all volunteers aiming to make the best quality articles we can, and by you trying to sneakily change the pages back to the way you wanted them without letting me know, it makes me think you are not serving in good fatih, and are in fact being disruptive. - adamstom97 (talk) 11:15, 19 September 2014 (UTC)

Notice

There is currently a discussion at Misplaced Pages:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.

3RR complaint

There is a risk you may be blocked as a result of the edit warring complaint. Please see Misplaced Pages:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:Hotwiki reported by User:Adamstom.97 (Result: ) and respond there if you wish. Thank you, EdJohnston (talk) 14:53, 19 September 2014 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Agents of SHIELD season 2 cast.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Agents of SHIELD season 2 cast.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Misplaced Pages under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Misplaced Pages. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Misplaced Pages (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 12:58, 20 September 2014 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Marvel Cinematic Universe timeline.jpeg

Thanks for uploading File:Marvel Cinematic Universe timeline.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Misplaced Pages under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Misplaced Pages. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Misplaced Pages (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 13:56, 20 September 2014 (UTC)

Your reversion of my edit to "Guardians of the Galaxy (film)"

Greetings and felicitations. I noticed that you reverted my edit to the Guardians of the Galaxy (film) article. As a counter argument to your reason for doing so, I would like to bring to your attention this opinion by an admin. Best—DocWatson42 (talk) 06:07, 27 September 2014 (UTC)

It should be kept as is for now, but you can bring up the issue at Talk:Marvel Cinematic Universe if you wish. - adamstom97 (talk) 06:20, 27 September 2014 (UTC)

File:Marvel Cinematic Universe timeline.jpeg listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Marvel Cinematic Universe timeline.jpeg, has been listed at Misplaced Pages:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 13:33, 1 October 2014 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Marvel's Daredevil logo September 2014.png

Thanks for uploading File:Marvel's Daredevil logo September 2014.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Misplaced Pages under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Misplaced Pages. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Misplaced Pages (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 20:27, 3 October 2014 (UTC)

Misinformation and legal implications

As editors you are aware of the power placed upon you. Spreading misinformation even after receiving official information from us is not only criminal but also implies deliberate intent. It damages our franchise which sells both comicbooks and movies - all, I repeat, all, of our movies are based on comicbook characters, not real people. Our fans are passionate and because of the misinformation here which gets repeated it creates confusion for comicbook fans who've known the character has existed for decades

Tony Stark/Iron Man was introduced in 1963 and it has nothing to do with Elon Musk, whom was not born at that time nor is in any way related. Downey met Elon to make the entrepreneur side appear realistic and Elon is the closes entrepreneur to Downey's residence in Malibu. I'm sure you are not aware of such information either.

Revert the edit immediately and I invite you to contact me personally and verify with the Iron Man Comicbook Misplaced Pages page, which correctly states anything you need to know. Anonymity behind an username does not protect you for the legal ramifications for deliberately ignoring our request and spreading misinformation.

We understand you are Elon Musk fans but your misinformation gets repeated by other outlets and we've repeatedly tried to correct this.

Contact me asap at dan_klores@dkcnews.com and revert my changes.

NYCC notes

I won't be on much this weekend to find sources for these:

• Face Your Enemy aired in full

• Agent Carter footage aired. Filming for the series began possibly a week ago, or on Monday of this week (at least the scene we saw tonight was filmed Monday).

I'll update here tomorrow after I (hopefully) get into the Daredevil panel. - Favre1fan93 (talk) 00:54, 11 October 2014 (UTC)

Cool, will sort it out, have fun! - adamstom97 (talk) 01:05, 11 October 2014 (UTC)