Revision as of 07:56, 2 September 2014 editYunshui (talk | contribs)Pending changes reviewers69,412 edits sod it, let's get started← Previous edit | Revision as of 07:08, 13 October 2014 edit undoYunshui (talk | contribs)Pending changes reviewers69,412 edits manually updating article historyNext edit → | ||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
⚫ | |||
{{WikiProjectBannerShell|1= | {{WikiProjectBannerShell|1= | ||
{{WikiProject Japan|class=GA|importance=high|b2=n|religion=y|culture=y}} | {{WikiProject Japan|class=GA|importance=high|b2=n|religion=y|culture=y}} | ||
Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
|action1result=listed | |action1result=listed | ||
|action1oldid=555551513 | |action1oldid=555551513 | ||
|action2 = FAC | |||
|action2date=07:08, 13 October 2014 (UTC) | |||
⚫ | |currentstatus= |
||
⚫ | |action2link=Misplaced Pages:Featured article candidates/Bonshō/archive1 | ||
|action2result = promoted | |||
|action2oldid = 629405441 | |||
⚫ | |currentstatus=FA | ||
|topic=socsci | |topic=socsci | ||
|dykdate=19 May 2013 | |dykdate=19 May 2013 |
Revision as of 07:08, 13 October 2014
This article has not yet been rated on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
{{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
{{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
|
Bonshō is a featured article; it (or a previous version of it) has been identified as one of the best articles produced by the Misplaced Pages community. Even so, if you can update or improve it, please do so. | |||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||
A fact from this article appeared on Misplaced Pages's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on May 19, 2013.The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that an ill-considered inscription on a bonshō (Japanese temple bell) led directly the Siege of Osaka? | |||||||||||||
Current status: Featured article |
A fact from Bonshō appeared on Misplaced Pages's Main Page in the Did you know column on 19 May 2013 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|
GA Review
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:Bonshō/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Chiswick Chap (talk · contribs) 14:00, 17 May 2013 (UTC)
Rate | Attribute | Review Comment |
---|---|---|
1. Well-written: | ||
1a. the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct. | good | |
1b. it complies with the Manual of Style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation. | lead:
| |
2. Verifiable with no original research: | ||
2a. it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline. | well cited. | |
2b. reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose). | ok | |
2c. it contains no original research. | ok | |
3. Broad in its coverage: | ||
3a. it addresses the main aspects of the topic. | seems to do so | |
3b. it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style). | no wandering | |
4. Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each. | correct tone | |
5. Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute. | single editor | |
6. Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio: | ||
6a. media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content. | all images licensed on Commons | |
6b. media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions. | all images relevant and captioned | |
7. Overall assessment. | Interesting article integrating scholarly detail in an attractive and informative manner. A pleasure to find here at GA. |
Construction - Unclear?
I had to read the part about how the clay shell if sormed several times before I realised that the borad is used to shape the inside of the shell and also to work out that any inscription is inscribed also on the inside and (must be) mirrored about a vertical.
This is not an area I particularly know anything about so I don't want to cause any trouble but I think this could be clarified. FerdinandFrog (talk) 15:10, 19 May 2013 (UTC)
- As it happens, you aren't the first person to mention that - I thought I'd rewritten that bit to be somewhat clearer, but it evidently needs more work (without a diagram, it's surprising hard to describe). I'll have another look and see if I can do a better job of it. Thanks for the suggestion. Yunshui 雲水 07:00, 20 May 2013 (UTC)
- All unassessed articles
- GA-Class Japan-related articles
- High-importance Japan-related articles
- WikiProject Japan articles
- GA-Class Buddhism articles
- Low-importance Buddhism articles
- GA-Class musical instruments articles
- Low-importance musical instruments articles
- Misplaced Pages featured articles
- Featured articles that have not appeared on the main page
- Misplaced Pages Did you know articles that are featured articles
- Misplaced Pages Did you know articles