| Revision as of 20:03, 16 October 2014 editHJ Mitchell (talk | contribs)Edit filter managers, Autopatrolled, Checkusers, Oversighters, Administrators121,800 edits You have been blocked from editing. (TW)← Previous edit | Revision as of 20:04, 16 October 2014 edit undoGaijin42 (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers20,866 edits →huffpo: {{subst:alert|blp}}Tag: contentious topics alertNext edit → | ||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
| Blanket assertions against HuffPo are not going to go anywhere. If you have problems with a particular source (specific article) backing a particular statement, then bring it up, but do so without the over the top drama. You are accusing the authors of those pieces of being racists and nazis, which is itself an actual specific BLP violation. Do not restore the comment again or I will take it to ] ] (]) 19:54, 16 October 2014 (UTC) | Blanket assertions against HuffPo are not going to go anywhere. If you have problems with a particular source (specific article) backing a particular statement, then bring it up, but do so without the over the top drama. You are accusing the authors of those pieces of being racists and nazis, which is itself an actual specific BLP violation. Do not restore the comment again or I will take it to ] ] (]) 19:54, 16 October 2014 (UTC) | ||
| {{Ivm|2='''Please carefully read this information:''' | |||
| The Arbitration Committee has authorised ] to be used for pages regarding living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is ]. | |||
| Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means ] administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the ], our ], or relevant ]. Administrators may impose sanctions such as ], ], or ]. This message is to notify you sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions. | |||
| This message is informational only and does not imply misconduct regarding your contributions to date. | |||
| }}{{Z33}}<!-- Derived from Template:Ds/alert --> | |||
| == October 2014 == | == October 2014 == | ||
Revision as of 20:04, 16 October 2014
Biology and sexual orientation article
Replied on my talk page. Flyer22 (talk) 22:10, 20 June 2014 (UTC)
huffpo
Blanket assertions against HuffPo are not going to go anywhere. If you have problems with a particular source (specific article) backing a particular statement, then bring it up, but do so without the over the top drama. You are accusing the authors of those pieces of being racists and nazis, which is itself an actual specific BLP violation. Do not restore the comment again or I will take it to WP:AE Gaijin42 (talk) 19:54, 16 October 2014 (UTC)
Please carefully read this information:
The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.
Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Misplaced Pages, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.
This message is informational only and does not imply misconduct regarding your contributions to date.October 2014
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 20:02, 16 October 2014 (UTC)