| Revision as of 13:43, 18 October 2014 editTarc (talk | contribs)24,217 edits →Semiprotection?: - sounds like a good idea← Previous edit | Revision as of 19:12, 18 October 2014 edit undoCasliber (talk | contribs)Edit filter managers, Administrators200,912 editsm Changed protection level of User talk:Tarc: Persistent disruptive editing ( (expires 19:12, 18 January 2015 (UTC)) (indefinite))Next edit → | ||
| (No difference) | |||
Revision as of 19:12, 18 October 2014
Archive for the Now
... Tarc (talk) 12:50, 14 October 2014 (UTC)
I trust
my opinions on such decisions are clear. Collect (talk) 11:42, 17 October 2014 (UTC)
- Er, what? Tarc (talk) 12:28, 17 October 2014 (UTC)
- Relating to ArbCom topic bans from a single user talk page as being quite weird in esse. Cheers. Collect (talk) 12:45, 17 October 2014 (UTC)
- A bit like getting into a fender bender, then being barred from driving down that particular street. What can ya do, it's the law of the wiki-land, for now. Tarc (talk) 14:27, 17 October 2014 (UTC)
Semiprotection?
Err, wanna semiprotect this for a bit? Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 13:11, 18 October 2014 (UTC)
- Yea, that'd probably be a good idea for a bit, thanks. Between the pro-Gamergate aggressors and the rapper bio I brought to AfD last night, I think the Tarc Fan Club mailbox is overflowing. Tarc (talk) 13:43, 18 October 2014 (UTC)