| Revision as of 12:04, 24 October 2014 view sourceSineBot (talk | contribs)Bots2,556,025 editsm Signing comment by 2A00:1028:919D:664A:F835:DA47:7B06:6F1E - "→An ask: new section"← Previous edit | Revision as of 08:39, 25 October 2014 view source Middle 8 (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users8,254 edits ns: Acupuncture wordingNext edit → | ||
| Line 128: | Line 128: | ||
| Thank you for answer, anyway it is still for me a big problem, I am primitive e-mail generation. Please, how to open Teahouse? Jindrich <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">— Preceding ] comment added by ] (]) 12:02, 24 October 2014 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:Unsigned IP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> | Thank you for answer, anyway it is still for me a big problem, I am primitive e-mail generation. Please, how to open Teahouse? Jindrich <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">— Preceding ] comment added by ] (]) 12:02, 24 October 2014 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:Unsigned IP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> | ||
| ==Acupuncture wording== | |||
| Hi Jim, nothing personal, just agreed upon after much discussion (diff of wording , and for discussion see ] and links therein and sections preceding). Ordinarily you'd be right, and I would support the simplified wording, but this is an unusual case where the RCT's highlighted weren't part of the dataset, so changing the wording changes the meaning in a nearly 180-degree way. Doc James had the same concern which I addressed ]; see his comment "I do not see the justification for..." and my reply under it. | |||
| ; see for yourself, pp. 761-762. The majority of reviews Ernst looked at were actually positive, i.e. showing real > sham; but they were full of caveats. | |||
| As I mentioned in a recent comment at talk, the only way in which "real acupuncture was no better than sham" is a "finding" of Ernst '11 is in a very hazy "]" sense, insofar as he predicts the trend of future research as methods improve. But our job is to get both the spirit and the letter right without screwing up either. And we can do that by instead using sources that are based on more recent and better research, and find unambiguously for lack of clinically meaningful efficacy vs. sham, and thus can be summarized in a simple manner. QuackGuru is the one who has been insisting on keeping Ernst '11 there for whatever reason. | |||
| Cheers. --] <small>(] • ])</small> 08:39, 25 October 2014 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 08:39, 25 October 2014
 | To Leave a New Message Please click here to start a new Section. Remember to sign your post with four tildes (~~~~). Thank you! |
 Jim1138 talk archives |
|
1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 |
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 14 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 2 sections are present. |
Revert the article on Jekyll Island
back to the summaries included. Two edits ago. I'm confused as to why a plot summary of a 1000-page book is considered non-constructive; particularly since I came here specifically looking for one. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.124.176.137 (talk • contribs) 04:53, 15 July 2014 (UTC)
Niger Armed Forces
Jim1138,
I have temporarily removed the text and I am presently reorganizing it in MS word because it is easier for me to do so. I will re-introduce it in few hours as soon as I am done...that is if you stop undoing my work...You can verify tomorrow and if the article is not improved, organizationally and content wise, you can then undo what I have done. But for now, please let me work! — Preceding unsigned comment added by SonOfNiger (talk • contribs) 01:30, 20 July 2014 (UTC)
TT Quick
Please revert to TT Quick.net......the bands website for additional info.......also their Facebook page. By the way........are you a fucking jerk off or what........punk! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mognj (talk • contribs) 20:01, 28 July 2014 (UTC)
I DO NOT CARE.
DELETE THE PAGE. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Deletebots (talk • contribs) 24 August 2014 05:19 (UTC)
hey can i now have your attention please!
I just abuse a guy why?bcoz i had created a page with my research,hardwork and time and he deleated my page with single click,My pain is reasonable and i can't bow down to a bully. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Paras27 (talk • contribs) 24 August 2014 07:02 (UTC)
Peugeot 301 (2012)
Hello Jim1138. I am writing to you as to the changes you have made to the Peugeot 301 (2012) article. I would like to point out that in mid 2013, the 301 began production in Wuhan, China. This is also backed up by part of the 301's article saying so as well as Peugeot's deal with other Chinese manufacturers. Also, just recently in this month, Peugeot signed a deal with Iran Khodro to build the 301 as well as the 2008 in Tehran, Iran. As I am also new to editing on Misplaced Pages, I do not know how to add the reason why you deleted part of the article. I would also like to add that it was basic research on where the 301 is sold as it is currently sold globally.
Jarvis Cocker
Hello jim,
How do I source my info on Jarvis cocker correctly. The info is true, I know the man who trained him for his job, he worked on the market for Ron Hayes, with his colleague Ashley Dent. This article also refers to his job http://www.uncut.co.uk/jarvis-cocker/jarvis-cocker-on-south-bank-show-news
Thanks in advance
Max — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mdixon93 (talk • contribs) 00:18, 2 September 2014 (UTC)
TB
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Steal My Girl
Hi, sorry for my little outrage, it's just that these people don't understand and put stuff in pages that just don't go there, I've seen millions of pages about singles and the only ones with lyrics on them are really ancient or traditional songs and not popular songs, also it was just copied and pasted in the page from a lyrics website and that's not ok. And also putting a little four-leaf clover in the middle of the text doesn't help at all. My point is that I'm a big fan of One Direction and don't like people on Misplaced Pages don't take the pages related to them seriously (I created the Four album page and they wanted to eliminate it inmediately even though there was enough information about it) because there's bunch of little girls putting stuff whenever and wherever they want. I'll check out the info you linked me into. Thanks for noticing me and thank you for welcoming me, I love Misplaced Pages and I'll do the best I can to keep it clean. Karlitatv (talk) 18:21, 8 October 2014 (UTC)
dear jimbo,
I added the park because it is apox. 1 mile from my house. I really think that you should get a life. its 9:30 at night and who really cares about your F@#@in opinion. Again, GET A LIFE OR FEED SOME BIRDS.
BEST REGARDS, — Preceding unsigned comment added by Prince Ali2037 (talk • contribs) 04:33, 12 October 2014 (UTC)
ashlandNow removal from Ashland Kentucky Media
we added the following information to the Ashland, Kentucky Misplaced Pages page:
Ashland is home to ashlandNow, a multimedia - social network that covers the Greater Ashland Area. The network is often referred to as ashlandNow by the people living in the local area and has grown to become a social mainstay among it's many user.
ashlandNow is best known for it's weekly contest and prizes. However, ashlandNow offers many other things to the people living in Ashland such as: coupons, discounts, news and more as well as weekly charitable donations to local organizations.
This information is appropriate and relevant to the Ashland Kentucky area. There is no difference in our posting than there is in the following/similar postings:
NEWSPAPER and Radio sections which briefly describe each respected private company in the same fashion as we have described our company.
ashlandNow is owned by Majik Media, a lawful and legal entity from Ashland Kentucky.
Please refrain from removing our entry as it is both appropriate and fitting.
108.167.80.123 (talk) 04:43, 12 October 2014 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for October 18
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Misplaced Pages appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Galaxy Airlines Flight 203, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Sole Survivor. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:00, 18 October 2014 (UTC)
Fortuna Düsseldorf
Jim, I"m sorry, I don't know who you are or why you have removed every piece of information I added to the Misplaced Pages entry on Fortuna Düsseldorf. I have updated the information on the previous two seasons, corrected grammatical mistakes, and added information on Fortuna's history. The information I added was factual - wins, losses, etc. - which is available to anyone with access to a computer or a newspaper. Could you please restore the information I added. Thank you. Best regards, Thomas Jakobsh109.43.48.243 (talk) 22:31, 20 October 2014 (UTC)
Jim, I'm sorry, but your reply was both patronizing and pointless. Did you even read any of the changes I made? Obviously you did not read the existing article on Fortuna Düsseldorf. It covers more than 100 years of history - and it includes a total of six footnotes. Six! A lengthy discussion of Fortuna's history through the entire post-war era through to the 1970s contains not a single footnote. Perhaps all of this shod be removed as well? What I did was to update the existing information - which ends two years ago - with a careful and factual summary of the last two seasons. I also improved some of the English (which was obvious written by a non-English speaker). If you think this entry is stronger and that Misplaced Pages users are better served by a page that ends two years ago, I have to disagree with you. My changes were constructive and helpful; yours were destructive and idiotic. Best Regards, Thomas Jakobsh109.43.48.243 (talk) 23:01, 20 October 2014 (UTC)
How to answer?
Sorry, I am absolute beginner. How to contact Jim 1138? Thank you for a help! bulldog.bobik@seznam.cz — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A00:1028:919D:664A:F835:DA47:7B06:6F1E (talk) 18:37, 21 October 2014 (UTC)
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Enchrito
I worked at Taco Bell in the early '70's as a Senior Restaurant Manager and can verify the posting I made regarding the Enchrito. 68.60.66.69 (talk) 04:00, 22 October 2014 (UTC)
ask for a help
Coul you help me please with changes on my page, I still do not understand many things an need to ask for it - here? Where? Thank you Jindrich — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A00:1028:919D:664A:F835:DA47:7B06:6F1E (talk) 09:59, 24 October 2014 (UTC)
An ask
Thank you for answer, anyway it is still for me a big problem, I am primitive e-mail generation. Please, how to open Teahouse? Jindrich — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A00:1028:919D:664A:F835:DA47:7B06:6F1E (talk) 12:02, 24 October 2014 (UTC)
Acupuncture wording
Hi Jim, nothing personal, just restoring wording agreed upon after much discussion (diff of wording here, and for discussion see here and links therein and sections preceding). Ordinarily you'd be right, and I would support the simplified wording, but this is an unusual case where the RCT's highlighted weren't part of the dataset, so changing the wording changes the meaning in a nearly 180-degree way. Doc James had the same concern which I addressed here; see his comment "I do not see the justification for..." and my reply under it.
Here's the source; see for yourself, pp. 761-762. The majority of reviews Ernst looked at were actually positive, i.e. showing real > sham; but they were full of caveats.
As I mentioned in a recent comment at talk, the only way in which "real acupuncture was no better than sham" is a "finding" of Ernst '11 is in a very hazy "spirit of the law" sense, insofar as he predicts the trend of future research as methods improve. But our job is to get both the spirit and the letter right without screwing up either. And we can do that by instead using sources that are based on more recent and better research, and find unambiguously for lack of clinically meaningful efficacy vs. sham, and thus can be summarized in a simple manner. QuackGuru is the one who has been insisting on keeping Ernst '11 there for whatever reason.
Cheers. --Middle 8 (contribs • COI) 08:39, 25 October 2014 (UTC)