Misplaced Pages

User talk:WLU: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 20:28, 27 October 2014 editSphilbrick (talk | contribs)Administrators178,601 edits Clarification motion: new section← Previous edit Revision as of 00:55, 28 October 2014 edit undoLowercase sigmabot III (talk | contribs)Bots, Template editors2,298,161 editsm Archiving 2 discussion(s) to User talk:WLU/Archive 10) (botNext edit →
Line 30: Line 30:
*] *]
*]}} *]}}

== You have been nominated for a gift from the Wikimedia Foundation! ==
You have been selected to receive a merchandise giveaway. Please send us a message if you would like to claim your shirt. Thank you again for all you do! --] (]) 07:54, 4 March 2014 (UTC)


== Thank you! A gift from fellow Wikipedians. ==
You have been selected to receive a merchandise giveaway. We last contacted you on 3/4/2014. Please send us a message if you would like to claim your shirt. --] (]) 06:21, 20 March 2014 (UTC)


== CFS treatment page == == CFS treatment page ==

Revision as of 00:55, 28 October 2014

Please note that I usually don't do e-mail; if it's about wikipedia use my talk page.
If I judge it requires discretion, I'll contact you. This is tremendously one-sided. I assure you, I feel terrible about it. Really I do.
Note that my contributions are down a lot these days, I'm busy with other stuff, but otherwise fine. Also note that for some reason I'm not getting e-mail alerts when this page is edited, so for important issues please send me an e-mail directly.

Archives


This page has archives. Sections older than 7 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III.

CFS treatment page

If you have time, could you take a quick look at the dispute on the Chronic fatigue syndrome treatment page? --sciencewatcher (talk) 22:36, 9 May 2014 (UTC)

MfD nomination of Misplaced Pages:Requests for comment/Bittergrey

Misplaced Pages:Requests for comment/Bittergrey, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Misplaced Pages:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Bittergrey and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Misplaced Pages:Requests for comment/Bittergrey during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Daniel Case (talk) 00:17, 12 June 2014 (UTC)

something you were involved with previously has resurfaced FYI

Janet Reno. --— Rhododendrites 02:58, 12 June 2014 (UTC)

I'm the editor who brought it up once more. I'm on freenode #wikipedia-en, nick Egnt if you'd like to discuss it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 174.125.115.111 (talk) 03:32, 12 June 2014 (UTC)
I'll discuss it on the talk page, thanks. WLU (t) (c) Misplaced Pages's rules:/complex 17:01, 17 June 2014 (UTC)

July 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Devlin MacGregor may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • analysis, merely a list of unrelated examples of fiction that happen to use the same company name (or perhaps not even the same company since apparently "the spelling may vary". Misplaced Pages is [[WP:

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 18:23, 15 July 2014 (UTC)

Clarification motion

A case (Sexology) in which you were involved has been modified by motion which changed the wording of the discretionary sanctions section to clarify that the scope applies to pages, not just articles. For the arbitration committee --S Philbrick(Talk) 20:28, 27 October 2014 (UTC)