| Revision as of 17:03, 10 July 2006 editJonathunder (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled33,396 edits Editing← Previous edit | Revision as of 06:16, 11 July 2006 edit undoHagiographer (talk | contribs)182 editsNo edit summaryNext edit → | ||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| == Editing == | == Editing == | ||
| Hello. Welcome back from your long block. I hope you can edit more constructively, but I am very concerned to see that as soon as you came back you restarted an edit war on the ] article, which had been stable on a compromise to use Emporor in the image caption for H.S. but not to use honorifics in a way that is not done on image captions for other royals. Please do not do this, and please review again the advice given on this talk page, rather than blanking it. ] 17:03, 10 July 2006 (UTC) | Hello. Welcome back from your long block. I hope you can edit more constructively, but I am very concerned to see that as soon as you came back you restarted an edit war on the ] article, which had been stable on a compromise to use Emporor in the image caption for H.S. but not to use honorifics in a way that is not done on image captions for other royals. Please do not do this, and please review again the advice given on this talk page, rather than blanking it. ] 17:03, 10 July 2006 (UTC) | ||
| == Please, be constructive == | |||
| I've already said to you that I'm not Zapatancas. If you don't like my edits tell me why with reasons linked to content. I haven't reverted to Zapatancas' version but to a version previous to your (Zapatancas and SqueakBox's) edit war because I've found mistakes, such as the use of "Armendáris" instead of "Armendáriz", that I believe were introduced only because you hate each other so much you didn't care any longer about the article. And I don't understand what is the use of reverting a sub-article to the main article. So, please, talk about content giving reasons and not using unpleasant remarks. ] 06:16, 11 July 2006 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 06:16, 11 July 2006
Editing
Hello. Welcome back from your long block. I hope you can edit more constructively, but I am very concerned to see that as soon as you came back you restarted an edit war on the Rastafari movement article, which had been stable on a compromise to use Emporor in the image caption for H.S. but not to use honorifics in a way that is not done on image captions for other royals. Please do not do this, and please review again the advice given on this talk page, rather than blanking it. Jonathunder 17:03, 10 July 2006 (UTC)
Please, be constructive
I've already said to you that I'm not Zapatancas. If you don't like my edits tell me why with reasons linked to content. I haven't reverted to Zapatancas' version but to a version previous to your (Zapatancas and SqueakBox's) edit war because I've found mistakes, such as the use of "Armendáris" instead of "Armendáriz", that I believe were introduced only because you hate each other so much you didn't care any longer about the article. And I don't understand what is the use of reverting a sub-article to the main article. So, please, talk about content giving reasons and not using unpleasant remarks. Hagiographer 06:16, 11 July 2006 (UTC)