| Revision as of 20:26, 31 October 2014 editSerendipodous (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers76,337 edits →If it's not your job...← Previous edit | Revision as of 20:46, 31 October 2014 edit undoTarc (talk | contribs)24,217 editsm Reverted edits by Serendipodous (talk) to last version by RGloucesterNext edit → | ||
| Line 56: | Line 56: | ||
| | Commons-emblem-notice.svg | | Commons-emblem-notice.svg | ||
| | icon size = 50px}} | | icon size = 50px}} | ||
| ==If it's not your job...== | |||
| then don't delete others' work. Put a {{dubious}} or {{cn}} tag and leave a comment on the talk page. Also, learn to write nicer edit summaries before you get angry at other people's responses. <b>]]<font color="#00b">]</font></b> 20:25, 31 October 2014 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 20:46, 31 October 2014
Archive for the Now
... Tarc (talk) 12:50, 14 October 2014 (UTC)
I trust
my opinions on such decisions are clear. Collect (talk) 11:42, 17 October 2014 (UTC)
- Er, what? Tarc (talk) 12:28, 17 October 2014 (UTC)
- Relating to ArbCom topic bans from a single user talk page as being quite weird in esse. Cheers. Collect (talk) 12:45, 17 October 2014 (UTC)
- A bit like getting into a fender bender, then being barred from driving down that particular street. What can ya do, it's the law of the wiki-land, for now. Tarc (talk) 14:27, 17 October 2014 (UTC)
Semiprotection?
Err, wanna semiprotect this for a bit? Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 13:11, 18 October 2014 (UTC)
- Yea, that'd probably be a good idea for a bit, thanks. Between the pro-Gamergate aggressors and the rapper bio I brought to AfD last night, I think the Tarc Fan Club mailbox is overflowing. Tarc (talk) 13:43, 18 October 2014 (UTC)
- Alright - gave it 3 months. Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 19:12, 18 October 2014 (UTC)
- Rockin', thanks. Tarc (talk) 20:01, 18 October 2014 (UTC)
- Alright - gave it 3 months. Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 19:12, 18 October 2014 (UTC)
Notice
There is currently a discussion at Misplaced Pages:Administrators' noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is Nip Gamergate in the bud. Thank you. —Ryūlóng (琉竜) 10:23, 23 October 2014 (UTC)
- Yea, unfortunately I've got a fan club that is no doubt watching for any toes out of line wrt this affair. Participating in an admin noticeboard thread where I'm not primarily involved may be a grey area. Tarc (talk) 13:25, 23 October 2014 (UTC)
Request for mediation rejected
The request for formal mediation concerning GamerGate (controversy), to which you were listed as a party, has been declined. To read an explanation by the Mediation Committee for the rejection of this request, see the mediation request page, which will be deleted by an administrator after a reasonable time. Please direct questions relating to this request to the Chairman of the Committee, or to the mailing list. For more information on forms of dispute resolution, other than formal mediation, that are available, see Misplaced Pages:Dispute resolution.
For the Mediation Committee, TransporterMan (TALK) 15:32, 23 October 2014 (UTC)
(Delivered by MediationBot, on behalf of the Mediation Committee.)
ANI notice
There is currently a discussion at Misplaced Pages:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.--ArmyLine (talk) 06:29, 26 October 2014 (UTC)
You are involved in a recently filed request for arbitration. Please review the request at Misplaced Pages:Arbitration/Requests/Case#Gamergate and, if you wish to do so, enter your statement and any other material you wish to submit to the Arbitration Committee. Additionally, the following resources may be of use—
Thanks,
Notice
Please read this notification carefully:
A community decision has authorised the use of general sanctions for pages related to the Gamergate controversy.
The details of these sanctions are described here.
General sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimise disruption in controversial topic areas. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to these topics that do not adhere to the purpose of Misplaced Pages, our standards of behaviour, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. An editor can only be sanctioned after he or she has been made aware that general sanctions are in effect. This notification is meant to inform you that sanctions are authorised in these topic areas, which you have been editing. It is only effective if it is logged here. Before continuing to edit pages in these topic areas, please familiarise yourself with the general sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.
This message is informational only and does not imply misconduct regarding your contributions to date. RGloucester — ☎ 21:54, 28 October 2014 (UTC)