| Revision as of 19:07, 11 July 2006 editVanasdale (talk | contribs)7 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit | Revision as of 19:07, 11 July 2006 edit undoVanasdale (talk | contribs)7 editsNo edit summaryNext edit → | ||
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
| * I will slow down the pace of updates to this article until it's determined that this article may stay. --thank you | * I will slow down the pace of updates to this article until it's determined that this article may stay. --thank you | ||
| ~ ~ ~ ~ ASDC's entry author | ~ ~ ~ ~ ASDC's entry author | ||
| **'''Comment''' - Just FYI, you reply below the last person, not above the title bar. I fixed it for you.- ] 18:43, 11 July 2006 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 19:07, 11 July 2006
Acquired-Sight.com
Article on a small ISP that fails WP:CORP notability wise. Google hits for ""Acquired Sight" + ISP" = 71. No 3rd press mentions either. -- Netsnipe 17:18, 11 July 2006 (UTC)
- Delete, non-notable- PresN 18:41, 11 July 2006 (UTC)
To all, I suppose this information doesn't warrant WP:CORP as much as it was going to cover the pioneering and business practices of Outdoor Wireless ISPs in 2001 using Acquired-Sight.com as an example.
Google hits a year or 2 ago would have provided more than enough chatter, however the business sold to a company who downsized it to be their 2nd income with existing customers.
Their decision basically gave the appearance of ASDC being defunct.
- I will slow down the pace of updates to this article until it's determined that this article may stay. --thank you
~ ~ ~ ~ ASDC's entry author