Misplaced Pages

:Articles for deletion/List of food topics: Difference between revisions - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 21:05, 11 July 2006 editGreen caterpillar (talk | contribs)3,262 edits comment AfD← Previous edit Revision as of 21:09, 11 July 2006 edit undoJewbo WaIes, LOL (talk | contribs)30 editsNo edit summaryNext edit →
Line 12: Line 12:
The ''']''' alone is larger than all the lists I've built combined!!! And then there's the mathematics topic lists and the list of mathematicians (which is 166 kilobytes long!). That food shouldn't be afforded similar treatment doesn't make any sense, especially considering the central role it plays in all of our lives. If the approach is okay to take on the far broader subjects of Mathematics, Philosophy, Biology, etc., then why isn't it appropriate for the narrower subject of food? Your stance doesn't make any sense. Please explain. --] 20:21, 11 July 2006 (UTC) The ''']''' alone is larger than all the lists I've built combined!!! And then there's the mathematics topic lists and the list of mathematicians (which is 166 kilobytes long!). That food shouldn't be afforded similar treatment doesn't make any sense, especially considering the central role it plays in all of our lives. If the approach is okay to take on the far broader subjects of Mathematics, Philosophy, Biology, etc., then why isn't it appropriate for the narrower subject of food? Your stance doesn't make any sense. Please explain. --] 20:21, 11 July 2006 (UTC)
:What I think is unmaintainable is that there are way too many food-related topics, because one could include list of foods, food agencies, meal types, etc. ] 21:05, 11 July 2006 (UTC) :What I think is unmaintainable is that there are way too many food-related topics, because one could include list of foods, food agencies, meal types, etc. ] 21:05, 11 July 2006 (UTC)
*'''Abstain'''. I abstain. --] 21:09, 11 July 2006 (UTC)

Revision as of 21:09, 11 July 2006

List of food topics

Listcurft. Certainly incomplete and potenially very huge list. Would work much better as a category, if there isn't one already. -- Koffieyahoo 04:27, 10 July 2006 (UTC)

Part of a series on
Mathematics
Areas
Relationship with sciences
Mathematics Portal

The list for the letter A alone is larger than all the lists I've built combined!!! And then there's the mathematics topic lists and the list of mathematicians (which is 166 kilobytes long!). That food shouldn't be afforded similar treatment doesn't make any sense, especially considering the central role it plays in all of our lives. If the approach is okay to take on the far broader subjects of Mathematics, Philosophy, Biology, etc., then why isn't it appropriate for the narrower subject of food? Your stance doesn't make any sense. Please explain. --Transhumanist 20:21, 11 July 2006 (UTC)

What I think is unmaintainable is that there are way too many food-related topics, because one could include list of foods, food agencies, meal types, etc. Green caterpillar 21:05, 11 July 2006 (UTC)