| Revision as of 01:41, 8 November 2014 editStrongjam (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers7,643 edits →Talk:Gamergate controversy#4chan Ban: Not your claims sorry.← Previous edit | Revision as of 01:21, 10 November 2014 edit undoDungeonSiegeAddict510 (talk | contribs)821 edits →ArbCom Thing: new sectionNext edit → | ||
| Line 126: | Line 126: | ||
| I'm not sure what is going on in that section. I was just trying to explain why I removed the 4chan ban claim and suggest a couple sources along with quotes from those sources that the editor could use if they wanted to work the claim back in to the article. The 'open arms' quote is from the article not my opinion. — ] (]) 01:37, 8 November 2014 (UTC) | I'm not sure what is going on in that section. I was just trying to explain why I removed the 4chan ban claim and suggest a couple sources along with quotes from those sources that the editor could use if they wanted to work the claim back in to the article. The 'open arms' quote is from the article not my opinion. — ] (]) 01:37, 8 November 2014 (UTC) | ||
| == ArbCom Thing == | |||
| You are involved in a recently filed request for arbitration. Please review the request at ] and, if you wish to do so, enter your statement and any other material you wish to submit to the Arbitration Committee. Additionally, the following resources may be of use— | |||
| * ]; | |||
| * ]. | |||
| Thanks,<!-- Template:Arbcom notice --> and all that good stuff. --] ] 01:21, 10 November 2014 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 01:21, 10 November 2014
Welcome
|
- Yay! Someone gave me a WikiHand... er, a welcome message! --The Defender of Light >Grand Warlock Danzathel Aetherwing Inventory 23:59, 25 September 2013 (UTC)
October 2014
Please read this notification carefully:
A community decision has authorised the use of general sanctions for pages related to the Gamergate controversy.
The details of these sanctions are described here.
General sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimise disruption in controversial topic areas. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to these topics that do not adhere to the purpose of Misplaced Pages, our standards of behaviour, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. An editor can only be sanctioned after he or she has been made aware that general sanctions are in effect. This notification is meant to inform you that sanctions are authorised in these topic areas, which you have been editing. It is only effective if it is logged here. Before continuing to edit pages in these topic areas, please familiarise yourself with the general sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.
This message is informational only and does not imply misconduct regarding your contributions to date.
Acroterion (talk) 01:13, 28 October 2014 (UTC)
- uwotm8 --The Defender of Light Grand Warlock Danzathel Aetherwing >Inventory< 01:15, 28 October 2014 (UTC)
Please stop using talk pages such as Talk:Gamergate controversy for general discussion of the topic. They are for discussion related to improving the article; not for use as a forum or chat room. If you have specific questions about certain topics, consider visiting our reference desk and asking them there instead of on article talk pages. See here for more information. Thank you. EvergreenFir (talk) Please {{re}} 03:45, 29 October 2014 (UTC)
- kthx --The Defender of Light Grand Warlock Danzathel Aetherwing >Inventory< 03:46, 29 October 2014 (UTC)
BLP violations
Stop posting links to various things that allege wrong doing of living persons mentioned on the project without any actual proof. This violates WP:BLP. If you persist in adding this content to Misplaced Pages, you will likely be blocked.—Ryūlóng (琉竜) 06:28, 31 October 2014 (UTC)
- Fine. I do still have the edits in the history though. And since, quite frankly, editing some pages when a few users are lording over it, is to say, quite a pain. Best of luck with that gamergate thing... speaking of... time to write UnNews. --The Defender of Light Grand Warlock Danzathel Aetherwing >Inventory< 06:33, 31 October 2014 (UTC)
Signature issues
Presently, your signature violates many of the guidelines set out at WP:Signatures. It does not include your username here and on my end it takes up 5 lines of markup on my screen which is also against guidelines. Please truncate your signature formatting, because I'm fairly certain you're not allowed to use a separate template for it anyway.—Ryūlóng (琉竜) 06:38, 31 October 2014 (UTC)
- Its not getting any shorter than it is now. only shortened it because I have nothing better to do. I want the reference to the DS/DSII class in there. --Grand Warlock Danzathel Aetherwing >Inventory< 07:00, 31 October 2014 (UTC)
- Also my edit saved at midnight. Your argument is invalid. --Grand Warlock Danzathel Aetherwing >Inventory< 07:01, 31 October 2014 (UTC)
- You don't call dubs on UTC time. And I still see like 4 lines of signature.—Ryūlóng (琉竜) 07:55, 31 October 2014 (UTC)
- I'm on a 12~ inch netbook, and i'm seeing 3 lines. --Grand Warlock Danzathel Aetherwing >Inventory< 08:27, 31 October 2014 (UTC)
- Ok, its one line, now scram. --Grand Warlock Danzathel Aetherwing >Inventory< 08:31, 31 October 2014 (UTC)
- My god, some people don't seem to be busy enough - they start complaining about other people's signature... yikes! I see exactly five words in the sig, followed by the date. --Maxl (talk) 15:32, 31 October 2014 (UTC)
- The issue is the length of the signature in the editing window.—Ryūlóng (琉竜) 21:40, 2 November 2014 (UTC)
- Tell me about it. --Grand Warlock Danzathel Aetherwing >Inventory< 04:32, 1 November 2014 (UTC)
- You're not allowed to use templates for signatures either and your signature still does not include your screenname "DungeonSiegeAddict510" which it is required to under the signature policy.—Ryūlóng (琉竜) 21:40, 2 November 2014 (UTC)
- My god, some people don't seem to be busy enough - they start complaining about other people's signature... yikes! I see exactly five words in the sig, followed by the date. --Maxl (talk) 15:32, 31 October 2014 (UTC)
- You don't call dubs on UTC time. And I still see like 4 lines of signature.—Ryūlóng (琉竜) 07:55, 31 October 2014 (UTC)
Notice
There is currently a discussion at Misplaced Pages:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is DungeonSiegeAddict510's signature. Thank you. —Ryūlóng (琉竜) 21:55, 2 November 2014 (UTC)
- DungeonSiegeAddict510, if you do not alter your signature to follow policy, I will block you from editing. Everyone else on the project has figured out how to conform to this requirement; you need to to. --Floquenbeam (talk) 23:00, 2 November 2014 (UTC)
- Butts. --DSA510 Pls No Hate 23:16, 2 November 2014 (UTC) (does this work)
Gamergate
Yes, much better. Striking doesn't remove it but I was also more redactive than necessary out of caution. Thanks for your help.. --DHeyward (talk) 07:33, 5 November 2014 (UTC)
- Yes, I didn't get it at first, but now yeah, I should wait for RS to say something... hopefully. --DSA510 Pls No Hate 07:35, 5 November 2014 (UTC)
Talk:Gamergate controversy#4chan Ban
I'm not sure what is going on in that section. I was just trying to explain why I removed the 4chan ban claim and suggest a couple sources along with quotes from those sources that the editor could use if they wanted to work the claim back in to the article. The 'open arms' quote is from the article not my opinion. — Strongjam (talk) 01:37, 8 November 2014 (UTC)
ArbCom Thing
You are involved in a recently filed request for arbitration. Please review the request at Misplaced Pages:Arbitration/Requests/Case#GamerGate and, if you wish to do so, enter your statement and any other material you wish to submit to the Arbitration Committee. Additionally, the following resources may be of use—
Thanks, and all that good stuff. --DSA510 Pls No Hate 01:21, 10 November 2014 (UTC)