Revision as of 21:39, 10 November 2014 editWavyinfinity (talk | contribs)220 edits →Exoplanets: new section← Previous edit | Revision as of 22:10, 10 November 2014 edit undoKheider (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers31,885 edits :Exoplanets are simply not as well studied as our own system. It difficult to know the precise mass and diameter of most of these exo-planets, much less where and how big their various equivalents of the asteroid belt(s) and Kuiper belt(s) areNext edit → | ||
Line 26: | Line 26: | ||
Why is there no mention of exoplanets? Surely the 1,849 exoplanets that have been found have some sort of significance inside of a model which claims to explain their existence? Or is it that the 1,849 exoplanets found defy the nebular hypothesis so there can be no mention of them made here? ] ] (]) 21:39, 10 November 2014 (UTC) | Why is there no mention of exoplanets? Surely the 1,849 exoplanets that have been found have some sort of significance inside of a model which claims to explain their existence? Or is it that the 1,849 exoplanets found defy the nebular hypothesis so there can be no mention of them made here? ] ] (]) 21:39, 10 November 2014 (UTC) | ||
:Exoplanets are simply not as well studied as our own system. It difficult to know the precise mass and diameter of most of these exo-planets, much less where and how big their various equivalents of the ](s) and ](s) are (might be). We simply need to know more. We also need to better understand ] as in the case of the ]. -- ] (]) 22:10, 10 November 2014 (UTC) |
Revision as of 22:10, 10 November 2014
Nebular hypothesis is a featured article; it (or a previous version of it) has been identified as one of the best articles produced by the Misplaced Pages community. Even so, if you can update or improve it, please do so. | |||||||||||||
This article appeared on Misplaced Pages's Main Page as Today's featured article on September 5, 2014. | |||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||
Current status: Featured article |
This article has not yet been rated on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
{{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
|
Archives |
Exoplanets
Why is there no mention of exoplanets? Surely the 1,849 exoplanets that have been found have some sort of significance inside of a model which claims to explain their existence? Or is it that the 1,849 exoplanets found defy the nebular hypothesis so there can be no mention of them made here? Elephant in the room Wavyinfinity (talk) 21:39, 10 November 2014 (UTC)
- Exoplanets are simply not as well studied as our own system. It difficult to know the precise mass and diameter of most of these exo-planets, much less where and how big their various equivalents of the asteroid belt(s) and Kuiper belt(s) are (might be). We simply need to know more. We also need to better understand planetary migration as in the case of the nice model. -- Kheider (talk) 22:10, 10 November 2014 (UTC)
- Misplaced Pages featured articles
- Featured articles that have appeared on the main page
- Featured articles that have appeared on the main page once
- Old requests for peer review
- All unassessed articles
- Pages using WikiProject banner shell with duplicate banner templates
- FA-Class history of science articles
- Mid-importance history of science articles
- WikiProject History of Science articles
- Unassessed Astronomy articles
- Unknown-importance Astronomy articles
- Unassessed Astronomy articles of Unknown-importance
- Unassessed Solar System articles
- Unknown-importance Solar System articles
- Solar System task force
- FA-Class Astronomy articles
- Top-importance Astronomy articles
- FA-Class Astronomy articles of Top-importance