| Revision as of 02:17, 13 November 2014 view sourceRGloucester (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Page movers, Pending changes reviewers38,757 editsm RGloucester moved page Misplaced Pages talk:General sanctions/Gamergate/Requests for enforcement to Misplaced Pages:General sanctions/Gamergate/Requests for enforcement over redirect: Alternative style← Previous edit | Revision as of 02:19, 13 November 2014 view source RGloucester (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Page movers, Pending changes reviewers38,757 edits magic wordNext edit → | ||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| {{Misplaced Pages:General sanctions/Gamergate/header}} | {{Misplaced Pages:General sanctions/Gamergate/header}} | ||
| __NEWSECTIONLINK__ | |||
| ] | ] | ||
Revision as of 02:19, 13 November 2014
Notice of obsolescence:
Community sanctions in this area of conflict have been superseded by an Arbitration Committee sanctions regime. As a result, this community sanctions-related page is now obsolete, is retained only for historical reference, and should not be modified. For more information about Arbitration Committee sanctions, see this page. For the specific Committee decision that rescinded or modified these community sanctions, see WP:ARBGG.
Video game journalism
| Matter resolved. 01:56, 13 November 2014 (UTC) |
|---|
| The following discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it. |
|
The Video game journalism article is currently under attack by an anonymous IP repeatedly inserting discredited and specious claims about a living person related to the controversy, while refusing to engage in discussion on the talk page. Needs semi-protection. NorthBySouthBaranof (talk) 01:24, 13 November 2014 (UTC)
|
- I'd like to note that if this wasn't resolved in the manner that it was, the IP could not have been sanctioned as they have not been noticed of general sanctions. (Unsure where to put this as there isn't a talk page for this sub page) Tutelary (talk) 02:00, 13 November 2014 (UTC)
- NBSB didn't request that IP be sanctioned, only that the page be protected. However, it is all moot now. RGloucester — ☎ 02:01, 13 November 2014 (UTC)
- I'd like to note that if this wasn't resolved in the manner that it was, the IP could not have been sanctioned as they have not been noticed of general sanctions. (Unsure where to put this as there isn't a talk page for this sub page) Tutelary (talk) 02:00, 13 November 2014 (UTC)