Misplaced Pages

User talk:Worm That Turned: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 01:38, 13 November 2014 editLowercase sigmabot III (talk | contribs)Bots, Template editors2,304,377 editsm Archiving 2 discussion(s) to User talk:Worm That Turned/Archive 29) (bot← Previous edit Revision as of 11:12, 13 November 2014 edit undoWorm That Turned (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Checkusers, Oversighters, Administrators25,701 edits Just letting people know: new sectionNext edit →
Line 34: Line 34:


Am I doing this correctly by commenting on ]? ] ] <small>Please &#123;&#123;]&#125;&#125;</small> 21:41, 12 November 2014 (UTC) Am I doing this correctly by commenting on ]? ] ] <small>Please &#123;&#123;]&#125;&#125;</small> 21:41, 12 November 2014 (UTC)

== Just letting people know ==

I've been giving it a lot of thought over the past 6 months and I'm not planning to re-run for Arbcom. When I ran, I wanted certain things. When I saw what it was actually like behind the scenes, my priorities changed. I'm proud to say that everything I wanted to achieve has been achieved - real change behind the scenes should be on the way soon. There's a lot more to be done, but I'm planning to leave it for others. I might consider running again in 2015, but come December 31, I intend to relinquish my Arbcom hat, my checkuser bit and my bureaucrat bit. Thanks for listening. ]<sup>TT</sup>(]) 11:12, 13 November 2014 (UTC)

Revision as of 11:12, 13 November 2014

User Talk Articles To Do Toolbox Subpages DYK Awards

Archiving icon
Archives
Index
Archive 1Archive 2Archive 3
Archive 4Archive 5Archive 6
Archive 7Archive 8Archive 9
Archive 10Archive 11Archive 12
Archive 13Archive 14Archive 15
Archive 16Archive 17Archive 18
Archive 19Archive 20Archive 21
Archive 22Archive 23Archive 24
Archive 25Archive 26Archive 27
Archive 28Archive 29Archive 30
Archive 31Archive 32Archive 33
Archive 34Archive 35Archive 36
Archive 37


This page has archives. Sections older than 7 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 4 sections are present.

Welcome to my talk page. Leave me a message! I am probably offline and am unable to respond swiftly. I will respond as soon as I can. Please feel free to send me an email, where I will likely respond faster.

This user is stalked by friendly talk page staplers.
This user replies where s/he likes, and is inconsistent in that respect.

Talkback

Hello, Worm That Turned. You have new messages at Misplaced Pages:Sockpuppet investigations/Pearljambandaid.
Message added 00:17, 9 November 2014 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Hell in a Bucket (talk) 00:17, 9 November 2014 (UTC)

When you have a moment

Can you opine on this at NYB's page? I find it extremely hard to believe that the intent of your admin board prohibition meant to prohibit me from seeking redress in a situation I am directly involved in. Tarc (talk) 19:28, 10 November 2014 (UTC)

Instead, I've commented at the clarification. Worm(talk) 08:33, 11 November 2014 (UTC)

GGTF

On the "proposed decision" page, section re Sitush you have "... edit the biography in his userspace but with the intention of moving it to userspace ... which needs copyediting. pablo 15:07, 12 November 2014 (UTC)

This is why I shouldn't be allowed to write anything ever. Thanks for catching that. Worm(talk) 15:15, 12 November 2014 (UTC)
It's easily done, hard to proof your own writing. pablo 15:36, 12 November 2014 (UTC)
I've been glancing through the proposed decisions, and I noticed that in the "Sitush" section, it says, "Sitush has a demonstrated history of working in positively in controversial areas of the project, despite off-wiki harassment." There's an unnecessary "in" between "working" and "positively". --Biblioworm 19:47, 12 November 2014 (UTC)

Question on arbcom draft corrections

Am I doing this correctly by commenting on Wikipedia_talk:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Gender_Gap_Task_Force/Proposed_decision? EvergreenFir (talk) Please {{re}} 21:41, 12 November 2014 (UTC)

Just letting people know

I've been giving it a lot of thought over the past 6 months and I'm not planning to re-run for Arbcom. When I ran, I wanted certain things. When I saw what it was actually like behind the scenes, my priorities changed. I'm proud to say that everything I wanted to achieve has been achieved - real change behind the scenes should be on the way soon. There's a lot more to be done, but I'm planning to leave it for others. I might consider running again in 2015, but come December 31, I intend to relinquish my Arbcom hat, my checkuser bit and my bureaucrat bit. Thanks for listening. Worm(talk) 11:12, 13 November 2014 (UTC)